Phonological restrictions on lenition in Scottish gaelic

Michael Hammond, Yan Chen, Elise Bell, Andrew H Carnie, Diana B Archangeli, Adam P Ussishkin, Muriel Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There has been extraordinary attention devoted to the Celtic mutations over the years, with various authors arguing for phonological, morphological, or lexical treatments (and various blends thereof). Strikingly, this literature is virtually bereft of any mention of the phonological restrictions that can sometimes limit the applicability of mutation. In this article, we provide a detailed experimental and corpus-based investigation of the phonological restrictions on Scottish Gaelic mutation. Using both techniques, we show that the phonological restrictions are alive yet are in a state of flux. The continued productivity of these phonological aspects of the mutation system argues that any analysis of mutation must attend to them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)446-472
Number of pages27
JournalLanguage
Volume93
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

productivity
literature
Scottish Gaelic
Lenition
Mutation

Keywords

  • Celtic
  • Lenition
  • Morphology
  • Mutation
  • Phonology
  • Scottish gaelic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Phonological restrictions on lenition in Scottish gaelic. / Hammond, Michael; Chen, Yan; Bell, Elise; Carnie, Andrew H; Archangeli, Diana B; Ussishkin, Adam P; Fisher, Muriel.

In: Language, Vol. 93, No. 2, 2017, p. 446-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ecbe127e1e48460ca552a48aa2d1a4d1,
title = "Phonological restrictions on lenition in Scottish gaelic",
abstract = "There has been extraordinary attention devoted to the Celtic mutations over the years, with various authors arguing for phonological, morphological, or lexical treatments (and various blends thereof). Strikingly, this literature is virtually bereft of any mention of the phonological restrictions that can sometimes limit the applicability of mutation. In this article, we provide a detailed experimental and corpus-based investigation of the phonological restrictions on Scottish Gaelic mutation. Using both techniques, we show that the phonological restrictions are alive yet are in a state of flux. The continued productivity of these phonological aspects of the mutation system argues that any analysis of mutation must attend to them.",
keywords = "Celtic, Lenition, Morphology, Mutation, Phonology, Scottish gaelic",
author = "Michael Hammond and Yan Chen and Elise Bell and Carnie, {Andrew H} and Archangeli, {Diana B} and Ussishkin, {Adam P} and Muriel Fisher",
year = "2017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "446--472",
journal = "Language",
issn = "0097-8507",
publisher = "Linguistic Society of America",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phonological restrictions on lenition in Scottish gaelic

AU - Hammond, Michael

AU - Chen, Yan

AU - Bell, Elise

AU - Carnie, Andrew H

AU - Archangeli, Diana B

AU - Ussishkin, Adam P

AU - Fisher, Muriel

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - There has been extraordinary attention devoted to the Celtic mutations over the years, with various authors arguing for phonological, morphological, or lexical treatments (and various blends thereof). Strikingly, this literature is virtually bereft of any mention of the phonological restrictions that can sometimes limit the applicability of mutation. In this article, we provide a detailed experimental and corpus-based investigation of the phonological restrictions on Scottish Gaelic mutation. Using both techniques, we show that the phonological restrictions are alive yet are in a state of flux. The continued productivity of these phonological aspects of the mutation system argues that any analysis of mutation must attend to them.

AB - There has been extraordinary attention devoted to the Celtic mutations over the years, with various authors arguing for phonological, morphological, or lexical treatments (and various blends thereof). Strikingly, this literature is virtually bereft of any mention of the phonological restrictions that can sometimes limit the applicability of mutation. In this article, we provide a detailed experimental and corpus-based investigation of the phonological restrictions on Scottish Gaelic mutation. Using both techniques, we show that the phonological restrictions are alive yet are in a state of flux. The continued productivity of these phonological aspects of the mutation system argues that any analysis of mutation must attend to them.

KW - Celtic

KW - Lenition

KW - Morphology

KW - Mutation

KW - Phonology

KW - Scottish gaelic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020900431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020900431&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85020900431

VL - 93

SP - 446

EP - 472

JO - Language

JF - Language

SN - 0097-8507

IS - 2

ER -