Pioneers of microlithization: The “proto-aurignacian” of Southern Europe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Eurasia, assemblages containing large numbers of microlithic artifacts date predominantly to the terminal Pleistocene or postglacial periods. Much earlier “proto-Aurignacian” assemblages, found in several sites in southern Europe (Krems, Riparo Mochi, Grotta di Fumane, Arbreda Cave), date to between 33, 000 and 39, 000 B.P. Proto-Aurignacian assemblages are typified by substantial numbers of microlithic artifacts, predominantly retouched bladelets. This pattern contrasts sharply with those of both the preceding Mousterian and later classic Aurignacian and Gravettian. Early florescence and subsequent decline of microlithic assemblages (also known to occur in southwest Asia and southern Africa) casts a different light on the processes of microlithization, forcing us to disassociate the general phenomenon from the historically unique, global spread of microlithic technologies near the end of the Pleistocene.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-93
Number of pages11
JournalArcheological Papers of the American Anthropological Association
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Southern Europe
artifact
Southern Africa
Microlithic
Assemblages
Pioneers
Artifact

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

@article{35cac33d955f47f4ad4c571b80975f0a,
title = "Pioneers of microlithization: The “proto-aurignacian” of Southern Europe",
abstract = "In Eurasia, assemblages containing large numbers of microlithic artifacts date predominantly to the terminal Pleistocene or postglacial periods. Much earlier “proto-Aurignacian” assemblages, found in several sites in southern Europe (Krems, Riparo Mochi, Grotta di Fumane, Arbreda Cave), date to between 33, 000 and 39, 000 B.P. Proto-Aurignacian assemblages are typified by substantial numbers of microlithic artifacts, predominantly retouched bladelets. This pattern contrasts sharply with those of both the preceding Mousterian and later classic Aurignacian and Gravettian. Early florescence and subsequent decline of microlithic assemblages (also known to occur in southwest Asia and southern Africa) casts a different light on the processes of microlithization, forcing us to disassociate the general phenomenon from the historically unique, global spread of microlithic technologies near the end of the Pleistocene.",
author = "Kuhn, {Steven L}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1525/ap3a.2002.12.1.83",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "83--93",
journal = "Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association",
issn = "1551-823X",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pioneers of microlithization

T2 - The “proto-aurignacian” of Southern Europe

AU - Kuhn, Steven L

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - In Eurasia, assemblages containing large numbers of microlithic artifacts date predominantly to the terminal Pleistocene or postglacial periods. Much earlier “proto-Aurignacian” assemblages, found in several sites in southern Europe (Krems, Riparo Mochi, Grotta di Fumane, Arbreda Cave), date to between 33, 000 and 39, 000 B.P. Proto-Aurignacian assemblages are typified by substantial numbers of microlithic artifacts, predominantly retouched bladelets. This pattern contrasts sharply with those of both the preceding Mousterian and later classic Aurignacian and Gravettian. Early florescence and subsequent decline of microlithic assemblages (also known to occur in southwest Asia and southern Africa) casts a different light on the processes of microlithization, forcing us to disassociate the general phenomenon from the historically unique, global spread of microlithic technologies near the end of the Pleistocene.

AB - In Eurasia, assemblages containing large numbers of microlithic artifacts date predominantly to the terminal Pleistocene or postglacial periods. Much earlier “proto-Aurignacian” assemblages, found in several sites in southern Europe (Krems, Riparo Mochi, Grotta di Fumane, Arbreda Cave), date to between 33, 000 and 39, 000 B.P. Proto-Aurignacian assemblages are typified by substantial numbers of microlithic artifacts, predominantly retouched bladelets. This pattern contrasts sharply with those of both the preceding Mousterian and later classic Aurignacian and Gravettian. Early florescence and subsequent decline of microlithic assemblages (also known to occur in southwest Asia and southern Africa) casts a different light on the processes of microlithization, forcing us to disassociate the general phenomenon from the historically unique, global spread of microlithic technologies near the end of the Pleistocene.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55949093102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55949093102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1525/ap3a.2002.12.1.83

DO - 10.1525/ap3a.2002.12.1.83

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:55949093102

VL - 12

SP - 83

EP - 93

JO - Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association

JF - Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association

SN - 1551-823X

IS - 1

ER -