Planning, technology, and legitimacy: Structured public involvement in integrated transportation and land-use planning in the United States

Keiron Bailey, Benjamin Blandfor, Ted Grossardt, John Ripy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors have measured an Arnstein gap, that is, a significant difference between desired and actual levels of citizen participation in planning processes. This Arnstein gap exists because even well-intentioned professionals have an unrealistic expectation of achieving consensus across large planning scales. Further, it is often hoped or believed that technologies of representation will somehow accomplish consensus. The authors argue this is not possible without developing a stronger theoretical framework for their deployment in planning in democratic societies. The purpose of this research is to move the public closer to the center of the public infrastructure planning and design process in a productive, efficient, and more satisfactory manner, that is, to close the Arnstein gap. The authors adapt a participatory framework, called structured public involvement (SPI), for integrating visualization and geospatial technologies into large-scale public involvement in planning domains. The authors discuss how SPI using the casewise visual evaluation method is applied in collaboration with planners. A case study is presented of integrated transportation and land-use planning for an Indiana city. The results demonstrate that SPI achieves high levels of stakeholder satisfaction in addition to providing high-quality planning and design guidance for professionals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)447-467
Number of pages21
JournalEnvironment and Planning B: Planning and Design
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

land use planning
Land use
legitimacy
land use
Planning
planning
infrastructure planning
citizens' participation
planning process
visualization
public
stakeholder
infrastructure
Visualization
evaluation
society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Planning, technology, and legitimacy : Structured public involvement in integrated transportation and land-use planning in the United States. / Bailey, Keiron; Blandfor, Benjamin; Grossardt, Ted; Ripy, John.

In: Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2011, p. 447-467.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ab73fb2d0684177ac6abf297ad6a065,
title = "Planning, technology, and legitimacy: Structured public involvement in integrated transportation and land-use planning in the United States",
abstract = "The authors have measured an Arnstein gap, that is, a significant difference between desired and actual levels of citizen participation in planning processes. This Arnstein gap exists because even well-intentioned professionals have an unrealistic expectation of achieving consensus across large planning scales. Further, it is often hoped or believed that technologies of representation will somehow accomplish consensus. The authors argue this is not possible without developing a stronger theoretical framework for their deployment in planning in democratic societies. The purpose of this research is to move the public closer to the center of the public infrastructure planning and design process in a productive, efficient, and more satisfactory manner, that is, to close the Arnstein gap. The authors adapt a participatory framework, called structured public involvement (SPI), for integrating visualization and geospatial technologies into large-scale public involvement in planning domains. The authors discuss how SPI using the casewise visual evaluation method is applied in collaboration with planners. A case study is presented of integrated transportation and land-use planning for an Indiana city. The results demonstrate that SPI achieves high levels of stakeholder satisfaction in addition to providing high-quality planning and design guidance for professionals.",
author = "Keiron Bailey and Benjamin Blandfor and Ted Grossardt and John Ripy",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1068/b35128",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "447--467",
journal = "Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design",
issn = "0265-8135",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Planning, technology, and legitimacy

T2 - Structured public involvement in integrated transportation and land-use planning in the United States

AU - Bailey, Keiron

AU - Blandfor, Benjamin

AU - Grossardt, Ted

AU - Ripy, John

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The authors have measured an Arnstein gap, that is, a significant difference between desired and actual levels of citizen participation in planning processes. This Arnstein gap exists because even well-intentioned professionals have an unrealistic expectation of achieving consensus across large planning scales. Further, it is often hoped or believed that technologies of representation will somehow accomplish consensus. The authors argue this is not possible without developing a stronger theoretical framework for their deployment in planning in democratic societies. The purpose of this research is to move the public closer to the center of the public infrastructure planning and design process in a productive, efficient, and more satisfactory manner, that is, to close the Arnstein gap. The authors adapt a participatory framework, called structured public involvement (SPI), for integrating visualization and geospatial technologies into large-scale public involvement in planning domains. The authors discuss how SPI using the casewise visual evaluation method is applied in collaboration with planners. A case study is presented of integrated transportation and land-use planning for an Indiana city. The results demonstrate that SPI achieves high levels of stakeholder satisfaction in addition to providing high-quality planning and design guidance for professionals.

AB - The authors have measured an Arnstein gap, that is, a significant difference between desired and actual levels of citizen participation in planning processes. This Arnstein gap exists because even well-intentioned professionals have an unrealistic expectation of achieving consensus across large planning scales. Further, it is often hoped or believed that technologies of representation will somehow accomplish consensus. The authors argue this is not possible without developing a stronger theoretical framework for their deployment in planning in democratic societies. The purpose of this research is to move the public closer to the center of the public infrastructure planning and design process in a productive, efficient, and more satisfactory manner, that is, to close the Arnstein gap. The authors adapt a participatory framework, called structured public involvement (SPI), for integrating visualization and geospatial technologies into large-scale public involvement in planning domains. The authors discuss how SPI using the casewise visual evaluation method is applied in collaboration with planners. A case study is presented of integrated transportation and land-use planning for an Indiana city. The results demonstrate that SPI achieves high levels of stakeholder satisfaction in addition to providing high-quality planning and design guidance for professionals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958263610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958263610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/b35128

DO - 10.1068/b35128

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79958263610

VL - 38

SP - 447

EP - 467

JO - Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

JF - Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

SN - 0265-8135

IS - 3

ER -