Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling

P. E. Tornambe, G. F. Hilton, L. S. Polinier, D. A. Brinton, T. P. Flood, D. H. Orth, K. H. Packo, S. Green, S. R. Leff, L. Masciulli, D. L. Yarian, W. S. Grizzard, M. E. Hammwe, Douglas L Taren, C. M. Morgen, J. S. Tiedeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

192 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pneumatic retinopexy was compared with scleral buckling in a multicenter (7 centers), randomized, controlled, clinical trial with 198 patients. Admission criteria included detachments with retinal break(s) no greater than 1 clock hour in size, within the superor two thirds of the fundus, without significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). All patients were followed for at least 6 months. Scleral bucling was compared with pneumatic retinopexy with regard to single-operation reattachment (82 versus 73%), reattachment with one operation and postoperative laser/cryotherapy (84 versus 81%), overall reattachment with reoperations (98 versus 99%), final visual acuity of 20/50 or better in eyes with preoperative detachment of the macula for 2 weeks or less (56 versus 80%), PVR (5 versus 3%), and new retinal breaks (13 versus 23%). Complications, including reoperations, as measured by the 'score' system, were similar. The anatomic results of the two operations were not significantly different (P > 0.05), but pneumatic retinopexy had less morbidity and better postoperative visual acuity (P = 0.01). Pneumatic retinopexy is recommended for cases meeting the admission criteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)772-784
Number of pages13
JournalOphthalmology
Volume96
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Scleral Buckling
Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy
Retinal Perforations
Reoperation
Visual Acuity
Randomized Controlled Trials
Cryotherapy
Lasers
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Tornambe, P. E., Hilton, G. F., Polinier, L. S., Brinton, D. A., Flood, T. P., Orth, D. H., ... Tiedeman, J. S. (1989). Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. Ophthalmology, 96(6), 772-784.

Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. / Tornambe, P. E.; Hilton, G. F.; Polinier, L. S.; Brinton, D. A.; Flood, T. P.; Orth, D. H.; Packo, K. H.; Green, S.; Leff, S. R.; Masciulli, L.; Yarian, D. L.; Grizzard, W. S.; Hammwe, M. E.; Taren, Douglas L; Morgen, C. M.; Tiedeman, J. S.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 96, No. 6, 1989, p. 772-784.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tornambe, PE, Hilton, GF, Polinier, LS, Brinton, DA, Flood, TP, Orth, DH, Packo, KH, Green, S, Leff, SR, Masciulli, L, Yarian, DL, Grizzard, WS, Hammwe, ME, Taren, DL, Morgen, CM & Tiedeman, JS 1989, 'Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling', Ophthalmology, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 772-784.
Tornambe PE, Hilton GF, Polinier LS, Brinton DA, Flood TP, Orth DH et al. Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. Ophthalmology. 1989;96(6):772-784.
Tornambe, P. E. ; Hilton, G. F. ; Polinier, L. S. ; Brinton, D. A. ; Flood, T. P. ; Orth, D. H. ; Packo, K. H. ; Green, S. ; Leff, S. R. ; Masciulli, L. ; Yarian, D. L. ; Grizzard, W. S. ; Hammwe, M. E. ; Taren, Douglas L ; Morgen, C. M. ; Tiedeman, J. S. / Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. In: Ophthalmology. 1989 ; Vol. 96, No. 6. pp. 772-784.
@article{eb94512263c249a4a5977fff3accd7a4,
title = "Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling",
abstract = "Pneumatic retinopexy was compared with scleral buckling in a multicenter (7 centers), randomized, controlled, clinical trial with 198 patients. Admission criteria included detachments with retinal break(s) no greater than 1 clock hour in size, within the superor two thirds of the fundus, without significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). All patients were followed for at least 6 months. Scleral bucling was compared with pneumatic retinopexy with regard to single-operation reattachment (82 versus 73{\%}), reattachment with one operation and postoperative laser/cryotherapy (84 versus 81{\%}), overall reattachment with reoperations (98 versus 99{\%}), final visual acuity of 20/50 or better in eyes with preoperative detachment of the macula for 2 weeks or less (56 versus 80{\%}), PVR (5 versus 3{\%}), and new retinal breaks (13 versus 23{\%}). Complications, including reoperations, as measured by the 'score' system, were similar. The anatomic results of the two operations were not significantly different (P > 0.05), but pneumatic retinopexy had less morbidity and better postoperative visual acuity (P = 0.01). Pneumatic retinopexy is recommended for cases meeting the admission criteria.",
author = "Tornambe, {P. E.} and Hilton, {G. F.} and Polinier, {L. S.} and Brinton, {D. A.} and Flood, {T. P.} and Orth, {D. H.} and Packo, {K. H.} and S. Green and Leff, {S. R.} and L. Masciulli and Yarian, {D. L.} and Grizzard, {W. S.} and Hammwe, {M. E.} and Taren, {Douglas L} and Morgen, {C. M.} and Tiedeman, {J. S.}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "772--784",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling

AU - Tornambe, P. E.

AU - Hilton, G. F.

AU - Polinier, L. S.

AU - Brinton, D. A.

AU - Flood, T. P.

AU - Orth, D. H.

AU - Packo, K. H.

AU - Green, S.

AU - Leff, S. R.

AU - Masciulli, L.

AU - Yarian, D. L.

AU - Grizzard, W. S.

AU - Hammwe, M. E.

AU - Taren, Douglas L

AU - Morgen, C. M.

AU - Tiedeman, J. S.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Pneumatic retinopexy was compared with scleral buckling in a multicenter (7 centers), randomized, controlled, clinical trial with 198 patients. Admission criteria included detachments with retinal break(s) no greater than 1 clock hour in size, within the superor two thirds of the fundus, without significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). All patients were followed for at least 6 months. Scleral bucling was compared with pneumatic retinopexy with regard to single-operation reattachment (82 versus 73%), reattachment with one operation and postoperative laser/cryotherapy (84 versus 81%), overall reattachment with reoperations (98 versus 99%), final visual acuity of 20/50 or better in eyes with preoperative detachment of the macula for 2 weeks or less (56 versus 80%), PVR (5 versus 3%), and new retinal breaks (13 versus 23%). Complications, including reoperations, as measured by the 'score' system, were similar. The anatomic results of the two operations were not significantly different (P > 0.05), but pneumatic retinopexy had less morbidity and better postoperative visual acuity (P = 0.01). Pneumatic retinopexy is recommended for cases meeting the admission criteria.

AB - Pneumatic retinopexy was compared with scleral buckling in a multicenter (7 centers), randomized, controlled, clinical trial with 198 patients. Admission criteria included detachments with retinal break(s) no greater than 1 clock hour in size, within the superor two thirds of the fundus, without significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). All patients were followed for at least 6 months. Scleral bucling was compared with pneumatic retinopexy with regard to single-operation reattachment (82 versus 73%), reattachment with one operation and postoperative laser/cryotherapy (84 versus 81%), overall reattachment with reoperations (98 versus 99%), final visual acuity of 20/50 or better in eyes with preoperative detachment of the macula for 2 weeks or less (56 versus 80%), PVR (5 versus 3%), and new retinal breaks (13 versus 23%). Complications, including reoperations, as measured by the 'score' system, were similar. The anatomic results of the two operations were not significantly different (P > 0.05), but pneumatic retinopexy had less morbidity and better postoperative visual acuity (P = 0.01). Pneumatic retinopexy is recommended for cases meeting the admission criteria.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024312537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024312537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2662100

AN - SCOPUS:0024312537

VL - 96

SP - 772

EP - 784

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 6

ER -