Policy issues in environmental health disputes

Phil Brown, Stephen Zavestoski, Brian M Mayer, Sabrina McCormick, Pamela S. Webster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article compares the state of policies concerning three different diseases/conditions with putative environmental factors: asthma, breast cancer, and Gulf War-related illnesses. By comparing the state of four different types of policies - research funding, regulations, compensation/treatment, and citizen participation - the authors demonstrate the dynamic relationship between policies and health social movements. They identify four factors that shape policy for these three diseases: the science base supporting the environmental causation hypothesis, prevalence and perception of risk, the sources of support for the environmental causation hypothesis, and the strength of health social movements. All four factors contribute to policy outcomes, but they find the strength of health social movements to be particularly important for the three diseases they examine. In some cases, social movement activity can be more important than the strength of the science base in terms of policy outcome success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-202
Number of pages28
JournalAnnals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume584
Issue numberNOV.
StatePublished - Nov 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Movements
Disease
health
gulf war
citizens' participation
research policy
social movement
science
environmental factors
cancer
illness
funding
regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., Mayer, B. M., McCormick, S., & Webster, P. S. (2002). Policy issues in environmental health disputes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 584(NOV.), 175-202.

Policy issues in environmental health disputes. / Brown, Phil; Zavestoski, Stephen; Mayer, Brian M; McCormick, Sabrina; Webster, Pamela S.

In: Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 584, No. NOV., 11.2002, p. 175-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, P, Zavestoski, S, Mayer, BM, McCormick, S & Webster, PS 2002, 'Policy issues in environmental health disputes', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 584, no. NOV., pp. 175-202.
Brown P, Zavestoski S, Mayer BM, McCormick S, Webster PS. Policy issues in environmental health disputes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2002 Nov;584(NOV.):175-202.
Brown, Phil ; Zavestoski, Stephen ; Mayer, Brian M ; McCormick, Sabrina ; Webster, Pamela S. / Policy issues in environmental health disputes. In: Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2002 ; Vol. 584, No. NOV. pp. 175-202.
@article{656002c99d614a8d92182c84015c66dd,
title = "Policy issues in environmental health disputes",
abstract = "This article compares the state of policies concerning three different diseases/conditions with putative environmental factors: asthma, breast cancer, and Gulf War-related illnesses. By comparing the state of four different types of policies - research funding, regulations, compensation/treatment, and citizen participation - the authors demonstrate the dynamic relationship between policies and health social movements. They identify four factors that shape policy for these three diseases: the science base supporting the environmental causation hypothesis, prevalence and perception of risk, the sources of support for the environmental causation hypothesis, and the strength of health social movements. All four factors contribute to policy outcomes, but they find the strength of health social movements to be particularly important for the three diseases they examine. In some cases, social movement activity can be more important than the strength of the science base in terms of policy outcome success.",
author = "Phil Brown and Stephen Zavestoski and Mayer, {Brian M} and Sabrina McCormick and Webster, {Pamela S.}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "584",
pages = "175--202",
journal = "Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science",
issn = "0002-7162",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "NOV.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy issues in environmental health disputes

AU - Brown, Phil

AU - Zavestoski, Stephen

AU - Mayer, Brian M

AU - McCormick, Sabrina

AU - Webster, Pamela S.

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - This article compares the state of policies concerning three different diseases/conditions with putative environmental factors: asthma, breast cancer, and Gulf War-related illnesses. By comparing the state of four different types of policies - research funding, regulations, compensation/treatment, and citizen participation - the authors demonstrate the dynamic relationship between policies and health social movements. They identify four factors that shape policy for these three diseases: the science base supporting the environmental causation hypothesis, prevalence and perception of risk, the sources of support for the environmental causation hypothesis, and the strength of health social movements. All four factors contribute to policy outcomes, but they find the strength of health social movements to be particularly important for the three diseases they examine. In some cases, social movement activity can be more important than the strength of the science base in terms of policy outcome success.

AB - This article compares the state of policies concerning three different diseases/conditions with putative environmental factors: asthma, breast cancer, and Gulf War-related illnesses. By comparing the state of four different types of policies - research funding, regulations, compensation/treatment, and citizen participation - the authors demonstrate the dynamic relationship between policies and health social movements. They identify four factors that shape policy for these three diseases: the science base supporting the environmental causation hypothesis, prevalence and perception of risk, the sources of support for the environmental causation hypothesis, and the strength of health social movements. All four factors contribute to policy outcomes, but they find the strength of health social movements to be particularly important for the three diseases they examine. In some cases, social movement activity can be more important than the strength of the science base in terms of policy outcome success.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036417597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036417597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036417597

VL - 584

SP - 175

EP - 202

JO - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

JF - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

SN - 0002-7162

IS - NOV.

ER -