Political support for incomplete democracies

Realist vs. idealist theories and measures

William T Mishler, Richard Rose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

100 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Democratic regimes depend for their survival and effective functioning on the public's willing acquiescence and support; however, the measurement of support is problematic. The failure to appreciate the difference between established democracies and new regimes that may (or may not) be in the process of democratizing has prompted scholars to mismeasure support by relying on idealist measures. We propose a realist conception of political support and realist measures. We test these measures with data from the 1995-97 World Values Surveys, comparing their ability to describe and explain variations in support for both old and new regimes. Realist measures perform substantially better in all contexts and in ways that suggest the rationality of realist support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-320
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Political Science Review
Volume22
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2001

Fingerprint

political support
regime
democracy
rationality
ability
Values

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Democratization
  • Legitimacy
  • Measurement
  • Political support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Political support for incomplete democracies : Realist vs. idealist theories and measures. / Mishler, William T; Rose, Richard.

In: International Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, 10.2001, p. 303-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e633dfca65e4111bfcf7a00239c381c,
title = "Political support for incomplete democracies: Realist vs. idealist theories and measures",
abstract = "Democratic regimes depend for their survival and effective functioning on the public's willing acquiescence and support; however, the measurement of support is problematic. The failure to appreciate the difference between established democracies and new regimes that may (or may not) be in the process of democratizing has prompted scholars to mismeasure support by relying on idealist measures. We propose a realist conception of political support and realist measures. We test these measures with data from the 1995-97 World Values Surveys, comparing their ability to describe and explain variations in support for both old and new regimes. Realist measures perform substantially better in all contexts and in ways that suggest the rationality of realist support.",
keywords = "Democracy, Democratization, Legitimacy, Measurement, Political support",
author = "Mishler, {William T} and Richard Rose",
year = "2001",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "303--320",
journal = "International Political Science Review",
issn = "0192-5121",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political support for incomplete democracies

T2 - Realist vs. idealist theories and measures

AU - Mishler, William T

AU - Rose, Richard

PY - 2001/10

Y1 - 2001/10

N2 - Democratic regimes depend for their survival and effective functioning on the public's willing acquiescence and support; however, the measurement of support is problematic. The failure to appreciate the difference between established democracies and new regimes that may (or may not) be in the process of democratizing has prompted scholars to mismeasure support by relying on idealist measures. We propose a realist conception of political support and realist measures. We test these measures with data from the 1995-97 World Values Surveys, comparing their ability to describe and explain variations in support for both old and new regimes. Realist measures perform substantially better in all contexts and in ways that suggest the rationality of realist support.

AB - Democratic regimes depend for their survival and effective functioning on the public's willing acquiescence and support; however, the measurement of support is problematic. The failure to appreciate the difference between established democracies and new regimes that may (or may not) be in the process of democratizing has prompted scholars to mismeasure support by relying on idealist measures. We propose a realist conception of political support and realist measures. We test these measures with data from the 1995-97 World Values Surveys, comparing their ability to describe and explain variations in support for both old and new regimes. Realist measures perform substantially better in all contexts and in ways that suggest the rationality of realist support.

KW - Democracy

KW - Democratization

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Measurement

KW - Political support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035538440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035538440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 303

EP - 320

JO - International Political Science Review

JF - International Political Science Review

SN - 0192-5121

IS - 4

ER -