Popular influence on supreme court decisions

Helmut Norpoth, Jeffrey A. Segal, William T Mishler, Reginald S. Sheehan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their 1993 article in this Review, William Mishler and Reginald Sheehan reported evidence of both direct and indirect impacts of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. Helmut Norpoth and Jeffrey Segal offer a methodological critique and in their own reanalysis of the data find, contrary to Mishler and Sheehan, no evidence for a direct path of influence from public opinion to Court decisions. Instead, they find an abrupt-permanent shift of judicial behavior consistent with an indirect model of influence whereby popularly elected presidents, through new appointments, affect the ideological complexion of the Court. In response, Mishler and Sheehan defend the direct public opinion linkage originally noted, at both individual and aggregate level; respond to the methodological critique; and offer further statistical analysis to support the aggregate linkages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)711-724
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume88
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

court decision
public opinion
Supreme Court
statistical analysis
evidence
president

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Popular influence on supreme court decisions. / Norpoth, Helmut; Segal, Jeffrey A.; Mishler, William T; Sheehan, Reginald S.

In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, 1994, p. 711-724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Norpoth, Helmut ; Segal, Jeffrey A. ; Mishler, William T ; Sheehan, Reginald S. / Popular influence on supreme court decisions. In: American Political Science Review. 1994 ; Vol. 88, No. 3. pp. 711-724.
@article{30dc57fb20414b448d953c6f5cbf03da,
title = "Popular influence on supreme court decisions",
abstract = "In their 1993 article in this Review, William Mishler and Reginald Sheehan reported evidence of both direct and indirect impacts of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. Helmut Norpoth and Jeffrey Segal offer a methodological critique and in their own reanalysis of the data find, contrary to Mishler and Sheehan, no evidence for a direct path of influence from public opinion to Court decisions. Instead, they find an abrupt-permanent shift of judicial behavior consistent with an indirect model of influence whereby popularly elected presidents, through new appointments, affect the ideological complexion of the Court. In response, Mishler and Sheehan defend the direct public opinion linkage originally noted, at both individual and aggregate level; respond to the methodological critique; and offer further statistical analysis to support the aggregate linkages.",
author = "Helmut Norpoth and Segal, {Jeffrey A.} and Mishler, {William T} and Sheehan, {Reginald S.}",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.2307/2944805",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "711--724",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Popular influence on supreme court decisions

AU - Norpoth, Helmut

AU - Segal, Jeffrey A.

AU - Mishler, William T

AU - Sheehan, Reginald S.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - In their 1993 article in this Review, William Mishler and Reginald Sheehan reported evidence of both direct and indirect impacts of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. Helmut Norpoth and Jeffrey Segal offer a methodological critique and in their own reanalysis of the data find, contrary to Mishler and Sheehan, no evidence for a direct path of influence from public opinion to Court decisions. Instead, they find an abrupt-permanent shift of judicial behavior consistent with an indirect model of influence whereby popularly elected presidents, through new appointments, affect the ideological complexion of the Court. In response, Mishler and Sheehan defend the direct public opinion linkage originally noted, at both individual and aggregate level; respond to the methodological critique; and offer further statistical analysis to support the aggregate linkages.

AB - In their 1993 article in this Review, William Mishler and Reginald Sheehan reported evidence of both direct and indirect impacts of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. Helmut Norpoth and Jeffrey Segal offer a methodological critique and in their own reanalysis of the data find, contrary to Mishler and Sheehan, no evidence for a direct path of influence from public opinion to Court decisions. Instead, they find an abrupt-permanent shift of judicial behavior consistent with an indirect model of influence whereby popularly elected presidents, through new appointments, affect the ideological complexion of the Court. In response, Mishler and Sheehan defend the direct public opinion linkage originally noted, at both individual and aggregate level; respond to the methodological critique; and offer further statistical analysis to support the aggregate linkages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974317933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974317933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/2944805

DO - 10.2307/2944805

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84974317933

VL - 88

SP - 711

EP - 724

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

IS - 3

ER -