Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion

Brittany S. Barker, Janelle E. Cocio, Samantha R. Anderson, Joseph E. Braasch, Feng A. Cang, Heather D. Gillette, Katrina M Dlugosch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Species introductions often bring together genetically divergent source populations, resulting in genetic admixture. This geographic reshuffling of diversity has the potential to generate favourable new genetic combinations, facilitating the establishment and invasive spread of introduced populations. Observational support for the superior performance of admixed introductions has been mixed, however, and the broad importance of admixture to invasion questioned. Under most underlying mechanisms, admixture's benefits should be expected to increase with greater divergence among and lower genetic diversity within source populations, though these effects have not been quantified in invaders. We experimentally crossed source populations differing in divergence in the invasive plant Centaurea solstitialis. Crosses resulted in many positive (heterotic) interactions, but fitness benefits declined and were ultimately negative at high source divergence, with patterns suggesting cytonuclear epistasis. We explored the literature to assess whether such negative epistatic interactions might be impeding admixture at high source population divergence. Admixed introductions reported for plants came from sources with a wide range of genetic variation, but were disproportionately absent where there was high genetic divergence among native populations. We conclude that while admixture is common in species introductions and often happens under conditions expected to be beneficial to invaders, these conditions may be constrained by predictable negative genetic interactions, potentially explaining conflicting evidence for admixture's benefits to invasion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMolecular Ecology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

biological invasion
divergence
Population
genetic variation
Centaurea solstitialis
epistasis
Centaurea
introduced plants
population genetics
fitness

Keywords

  • cytonuclear interactions
  • epistasis
  • genetic diversity
  • heterosis
  • invasiveness
  • multiple introductions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics

Cite this

Barker, B. S., Cocio, J. E., Anderson, S. R., Braasch, J. E., Cang, F. A., Gillette, H. D., & Dlugosch, K. M. (Accepted/In press). Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14958

Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion. / Barker, Brittany S.; Cocio, Janelle E.; Anderson, Samantha R.; Braasch, Joseph E.; Cang, Feng A.; Gillette, Heather D.; Dlugosch, Katrina M.

In: Molecular Ecology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barker BS, Cocio JE, Anderson SR, Braasch JE, Cang FA, Gillette HD et al. Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion. Molecular Ecology. 2018 Jan 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14958
Barker, Brittany S. ; Cocio, Janelle E. ; Anderson, Samantha R. ; Braasch, Joseph E. ; Cang, Feng A. ; Gillette, Heather D. ; Dlugosch, Katrina M. / Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion. In: Molecular Ecology. 2018.
@article{d18d33a5073840ceac0f526b5ed54e5b,
title = "Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion",
abstract = "Species introductions often bring together genetically divergent source populations, resulting in genetic admixture. This geographic reshuffling of diversity has the potential to generate favourable new genetic combinations, facilitating the establishment and invasive spread of introduced populations. Observational support for the superior performance of admixed introductions has been mixed, however, and the broad importance of admixture to invasion questioned. Under most underlying mechanisms, admixture's benefits should be expected to increase with greater divergence among and lower genetic diversity within source populations, though these effects have not been quantified in invaders. We experimentally crossed source populations differing in divergence in the invasive plant Centaurea solstitialis. Crosses resulted in many positive (heterotic) interactions, but fitness benefits declined and were ultimately negative at high source divergence, with patterns suggesting cytonuclear epistasis. We explored the literature to assess whether such negative epistatic interactions might be impeding admixture at high source population divergence. Admixed introductions reported for plants came from sources with a wide range of genetic variation, but were disproportionately absent where there was high genetic divergence among native populations. We conclude that while admixture is common in species introductions and often happens under conditions expected to be beneficial to invaders, these conditions may be constrained by predictable negative genetic interactions, potentially explaining conflicting evidence for admixture's benefits to invasion.",
keywords = "cytonuclear interactions, epistasis, genetic diversity, heterosis, invasiveness, multiple introductions",
author = "Barker, {Brittany S.} and Cocio, {Janelle E.} and Anderson, {Samantha R.} and Braasch, {Joseph E.} and Cang, {Feng A.} and Gillette, {Heather D.} and Dlugosch, {Katrina M}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/mec.14958",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Molecular Ecology",
issn = "0962-1083",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion

AU - Barker, Brittany S.

AU - Cocio, Janelle E.

AU - Anderson, Samantha R.

AU - Braasch, Joseph E.

AU - Cang, Feng A.

AU - Gillette, Heather D.

AU - Dlugosch, Katrina M

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Species introductions often bring together genetically divergent source populations, resulting in genetic admixture. This geographic reshuffling of diversity has the potential to generate favourable new genetic combinations, facilitating the establishment and invasive spread of introduced populations. Observational support for the superior performance of admixed introductions has been mixed, however, and the broad importance of admixture to invasion questioned. Under most underlying mechanisms, admixture's benefits should be expected to increase with greater divergence among and lower genetic diversity within source populations, though these effects have not been quantified in invaders. We experimentally crossed source populations differing in divergence in the invasive plant Centaurea solstitialis. Crosses resulted in many positive (heterotic) interactions, but fitness benefits declined and were ultimately negative at high source divergence, with patterns suggesting cytonuclear epistasis. We explored the literature to assess whether such negative epistatic interactions might be impeding admixture at high source population divergence. Admixed introductions reported for plants came from sources with a wide range of genetic variation, but were disproportionately absent where there was high genetic divergence among native populations. We conclude that while admixture is common in species introductions and often happens under conditions expected to be beneficial to invaders, these conditions may be constrained by predictable negative genetic interactions, potentially explaining conflicting evidence for admixture's benefits to invasion.

AB - Species introductions often bring together genetically divergent source populations, resulting in genetic admixture. This geographic reshuffling of diversity has the potential to generate favourable new genetic combinations, facilitating the establishment and invasive spread of introduced populations. Observational support for the superior performance of admixed introductions has been mixed, however, and the broad importance of admixture to invasion questioned. Under most underlying mechanisms, admixture's benefits should be expected to increase with greater divergence among and lower genetic diversity within source populations, though these effects have not been quantified in invaders. We experimentally crossed source populations differing in divergence in the invasive plant Centaurea solstitialis. Crosses resulted in many positive (heterotic) interactions, but fitness benefits declined and were ultimately negative at high source divergence, with patterns suggesting cytonuclear epistasis. We explored the literature to assess whether such negative epistatic interactions might be impeding admixture at high source population divergence. Admixed introductions reported for plants came from sources with a wide range of genetic variation, but were disproportionately absent where there was high genetic divergence among native populations. We conclude that while admixture is common in species introductions and often happens under conditions expected to be beneficial to invaders, these conditions may be constrained by predictable negative genetic interactions, potentially explaining conflicting evidence for admixture's benefits to invasion.

KW - cytonuclear interactions

KW - epistasis

KW - genetic diversity

KW - heterosis

KW - invasiveness

KW - multiple introductions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058935065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058935065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/mec.14958

DO - 10.1111/mec.14958

M3 - Article

C2 - 30485593

AN - SCOPUS:85058935065

JO - Molecular Ecology

JF - Molecular Ecology

SN - 0962-1083

ER -