Potential of an outranking multi-criteria approach to support the participatory assessment of land management actions

Anahí Ocampo-Melgar, Susana Bautista, J. Edward deSteiguer, Barron J. Orr

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

We evaluated the potential of an outranking Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis approach for assisting in the participatory assessment of dryland management actions implemented in the San Simon watershed, in southeastern Arizona, USA. We compared an outranking-facilitated assessment of actions with a simple and direct (baseline) ranking of the same actions by the participating stakeholders in terms of: 1) internal homogeneity of each assessment approach, (2) similarity of individual assessments between methods, and (3) effects of the use of implicit/explicit assessment criteria. The actions assessed combined various management approaches, including livestock management (rotation, resting), vegetation management (grass seeding, brush control), and hydraulic structures (dams, dykes). The outranking-facilitated assessment discriminated better between actions and reduced the variability of results between individual stakeholders as compared with the direct ranking of actions. In general, the two assessments significantly differed in the relative preference of the five management actions assessed, yet both assessments identified rotational grazing combined with vegetation management (grass seeding and brush control) as the most preferred management action in the study area. The comparative analysis revealed inconsistencies between the use of implicit and explicit assessment criteria. Our findings highlight the opportunities offered by outranking approaches to help capture, structure, and make explicit stakeholder perspectives in the framework of a participatory environmental assessment process, which may facilitate the understanding of the multiple preferences involved. The outranking integration process, which resembles a voting procedure, proved simple and transparent, with potential for contributing to stakeholder engagement and trust in participatory assessment.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages70-77
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume195
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2017

Fingerprint

land management
stakeholder
seeding
ranking
grass
vegetation
Brushes
decision analysis
hydraulic structure
livestock farming
assessment method
environmental assessment
homogeneity
grazing
dam
watershed
voting
analysis
effect
Hydraulic structures

Keywords

  • Dryland restoration
  • Grazing management
  • Multicriteria decision analysis
  • Outranking
  • Participatory assessment
  • Stakeholder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Potential of an outranking multi-criteria approach to support the participatory assessment of land management actions. / Ocampo-Melgar, Anahí; Bautista, Susana; Edward deSteiguer, J.; Orr, Barron J.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 195, 15.06.2017, p. 70-77.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{7a4a51b9eea14406a54fc25d01e8f1e4,
title = "Potential of an outranking multi-criteria approach to support the participatory assessment of land management actions",
abstract = "We evaluated the potential of an outranking Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis approach for assisting in the participatory assessment of dryland management actions implemented in the San Simon watershed, in southeastern Arizona, USA. We compared an outranking-facilitated assessment of actions with a simple and direct (baseline) ranking of the same actions by the participating stakeholders in terms of: 1) internal homogeneity of each assessment approach, (2) similarity of individual assessments between methods, and (3) effects of the use of implicit/explicit assessment criteria. The actions assessed combined various management approaches, including livestock management (rotation, resting), vegetation management (grass seeding, brush control), and hydraulic structures (dams, dykes). The outranking-facilitated assessment discriminated better between actions and reduced the variability of results between individual stakeholders as compared with the direct ranking of actions. In general, the two assessments significantly differed in the relative preference of the five management actions assessed, yet both assessments identified rotational grazing combined with vegetation management (grass seeding and brush control) as the most preferred management action in the study area. The comparative analysis revealed inconsistencies between the use of implicit and explicit assessment criteria. Our findings highlight the opportunities offered by outranking approaches to help capture, structure, and make explicit stakeholder perspectives in the framework of a participatory environmental assessment process, which may facilitate the understanding of the multiple preferences involved. The outranking integration process, which resembles a voting procedure, proved simple and transparent, with potential for contributing to stakeholder engagement and trust in participatory assessment.",
keywords = "Dryland restoration, Grazing management, Multicriteria decision analysis, Outranking, Participatory assessment, Stakeholder",
author = "Anahí Ocampo-Melgar and Susana Bautista and {Edward deSteiguer}, J. and Orr, {Barron J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.041",
volume = "195",
pages = "70--77",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential of an outranking multi-criteria approach to support the participatory assessment of land management actions

AU - Ocampo-Melgar,Anahí

AU - Bautista,Susana

AU - Edward deSteiguer,J.

AU - Orr,Barron J.

PY - 2017/6/15

Y1 - 2017/6/15

N2 - We evaluated the potential of an outranking Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis approach for assisting in the participatory assessment of dryland management actions implemented in the San Simon watershed, in southeastern Arizona, USA. We compared an outranking-facilitated assessment of actions with a simple and direct (baseline) ranking of the same actions by the participating stakeholders in terms of: 1) internal homogeneity of each assessment approach, (2) similarity of individual assessments between methods, and (3) effects of the use of implicit/explicit assessment criteria. The actions assessed combined various management approaches, including livestock management (rotation, resting), vegetation management (grass seeding, brush control), and hydraulic structures (dams, dykes). The outranking-facilitated assessment discriminated better between actions and reduced the variability of results between individual stakeholders as compared with the direct ranking of actions. In general, the two assessments significantly differed in the relative preference of the five management actions assessed, yet both assessments identified rotational grazing combined with vegetation management (grass seeding and brush control) as the most preferred management action in the study area. The comparative analysis revealed inconsistencies between the use of implicit and explicit assessment criteria. Our findings highlight the opportunities offered by outranking approaches to help capture, structure, and make explicit stakeholder perspectives in the framework of a participatory environmental assessment process, which may facilitate the understanding of the multiple preferences involved. The outranking integration process, which resembles a voting procedure, proved simple and transparent, with potential for contributing to stakeholder engagement and trust in participatory assessment.

AB - We evaluated the potential of an outranking Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis approach for assisting in the participatory assessment of dryland management actions implemented in the San Simon watershed, in southeastern Arizona, USA. We compared an outranking-facilitated assessment of actions with a simple and direct (baseline) ranking of the same actions by the participating stakeholders in terms of: 1) internal homogeneity of each assessment approach, (2) similarity of individual assessments between methods, and (3) effects of the use of implicit/explicit assessment criteria. The actions assessed combined various management approaches, including livestock management (rotation, resting), vegetation management (grass seeding, brush control), and hydraulic structures (dams, dykes). The outranking-facilitated assessment discriminated better between actions and reduced the variability of results between individual stakeholders as compared with the direct ranking of actions. In general, the two assessments significantly differed in the relative preference of the five management actions assessed, yet both assessments identified rotational grazing combined with vegetation management (grass seeding and brush control) as the most preferred management action in the study area. The comparative analysis revealed inconsistencies between the use of implicit and explicit assessment criteria. Our findings highlight the opportunities offered by outranking approaches to help capture, structure, and make explicit stakeholder perspectives in the framework of a participatory environmental assessment process, which may facilitate the understanding of the multiple preferences involved. The outranking integration process, which resembles a voting procedure, proved simple and transparent, with potential for contributing to stakeholder engagement and trust in participatory assessment.

KW - Dryland restoration

KW - Grazing management

KW - Multicriteria decision analysis

KW - Outranking

KW - Participatory assessment

KW - Stakeholder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007578310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007578310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.041

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.041

M3 - Article

VL - 195

SP - 70

EP - 77

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

T2 - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -