Potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod (continuous light) with alternating air temperature for production of tomato plug transplants in a closed system

Katsumi Ohyama, Koji Manabe, Yoshitaka Omura, Toyoki Kozai, Chieri Kubota

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate the potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod for transplant production in a closed system, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plug transplants were grown for 17 days either ander a 24-hour photoperiod with a photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 200 μmol·m -2·s-1 or under a 16-hour photoperiod with a PPF of 300 μmol·m-2·s-1, resulting in the same daily integrated PPF (17.3 mol·m-2). Air temperatures were alternated between 28°C during the first 16 hours and 16°C for the subsequent 8 hours of each day. Fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area were 41%, 25%, and 64% greater, respectively, under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. Physiological disorders (e.g., chlorosis and/or necrosis) were not observed under the 24-hour photoperiod, probably due to the alternating air temperature. Floral development of plants originating from both treatments did not differ significantly. Electric energy use efficiency of the closed system was 9% greater under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. These results suggest that using a 24-hour photoperiod with relatively low PPF can reduce both initial and operational costs for transplant production in a closed system due to the reduction in the number of lamps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)374-377
Number of pages4
JournalHortScience
Volume40
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

closed loop systems
air temperature
photoperiod
tomatoes
transplant production
chlorosis
Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum
necrosis
leaf area
flowering
photons
energy

Keywords

  • Electric energy
  • Floral development
  • Lycopersicon esculentum
  • Physiological disorders
  • Use efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Horticulture
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod (continuous light) with alternating air temperature for production of tomato plug transplants in a closed system. / Ohyama, Katsumi; Manabe, Koji; Omura, Yoshitaka; Kozai, Toyoki; Kubota, Chieri.

In: HortScience, Vol. 40, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 374-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{60c397d56cb14d6f89afbcd330ccbd36,
title = "Potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod (continuous light) with alternating air temperature for production of tomato plug transplants in a closed system",
abstract = "To evaluate the potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod for transplant production in a closed system, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plug transplants were grown for 17 days either ander a 24-hour photoperiod with a photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 200 μmol·m -2·s-1 or under a 16-hour photoperiod with a PPF of 300 μmol·m-2·s-1, resulting in the same daily integrated PPF (17.3 mol·m-2). Air temperatures were alternated between 28°C during the first 16 hours and 16°C for the subsequent 8 hours of each day. Fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area were 41{\%}, 25{\%}, and 64{\%} greater, respectively, under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. Physiological disorders (e.g., chlorosis and/or necrosis) were not observed under the 24-hour photoperiod, probably due to the alternating air temperature. Floral development of plants originating from both treatments did not differ significantly. Electric energy use efficiency of the closed system was 9{\%} greater under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. These results suggest that using a 24-hour photoperiod with relatively low PPF can reduce both initial and operational costs for transplant production in a closed system due to the reduction in the number of lamps.",
keywords = "Electric energy, Floral development, Lycopersicon esculentum, Physiological disorders, Use efficiency",
author = "Katsumi Ohyama and Koji Manabe and Yoshitaka Omura and Toyoki Kozai and Chieri Kubota",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "374--377",
journal = "Hortscience: A Publication of the American Society for Hortcultural Science",
issn = "0018-5345",
publisher = "American Society for Horticultural Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod (continuous light) with alternating air temperature for production of tomato plug transplants in a closed system

AU - Ohyama, Katsumi

AU - Manabe, Koji

AU - Omura, Yoshitaka

AU - Kozai, Toyoki

AU - Kubota, Chieri

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - To evaluate the potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod for transplant production in a closed system, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plug transplants were grown for 17 days either ander a 24-hour photoperiod with a photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 200 μmol·m -2·s-1 or under a 16-hour photoperiod with a PPF of 300 μmol·m-2·s-1, resulting in the same daily integrated PPF (17.3 mol·m-2). Air temperatures were alternated between 28°C during the first 16 hours and 16°C for the subsequent 8 hours of each day. Fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area were 41%, 25%, and 64% greater, respectively, under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. Physiological disorders (e.g., chlorosis and/or necrosis) were not observed under the 24-hour photoperiod, probably due to the alternating air temperature. Floral development of plants originating from both treatments did not differ significantly. Electric energy use efficiency of the closed system was 9% greater under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. These results suggest that using a 24-hour photoperiod with relatively low PPF can reduce both initial and operational costs for transplant production in a closed system due to the reduction in the number of lamps.

AB - To evaluate the potential use of a 24-hour photoperiod for transplant production in a closed system, tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plug transplants were grown for 17 days either ander a 24-hour photoperiod with a photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 200 μmol·m -2·s-1 or under a 16-hour photoperiod with a PPF of 300 μmol·m-2·s-1, resulting in the same daily integrated PPF (17.3 mol·m-2). Air temperatures were alternated between 28°C during the first 16 hours and 16°C for the subsequent 8 hours of each day. Fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area were 41%, 25%, and 64% greater, respectively, under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. Physiological disorders (e.g., chlorosis and/or necrosis) were not observed under the 24-hour photoperiod, probably due to the alternating air temperature. Floral development of plants originating from both treatments did not differ significantly. Electric energy use efficiency of the closed system was 9% greater under the 24-hour photoperiod than under the 16-hour photoperiod. These results suggest that using a 24-hour photoperiod with relatively low PPF can reduce both initial and operational costs for transplant production in a closed system due to the reduction in the number of lamps.

KW - Electric energy

KW - Floral development

KW - Lycopersicon esculentum

KW - Physiological disorders

KW - Use efficiency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14244256173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14244256173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:14244256173

VL - 40

SP - 374

EP - 377

JO - Hortscience: A Publication of the American Society for Hortcultural Science

JF - Hortscience: A Publication of the American Society for Hortcultural Science

SN - 0018-5345

IS - 2

ER -