Practical applications of usability theory to electronic data collection for clinical trials

Jordana K. Schmier, David W. Kane, Michael Halpern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pharmaceutical and device companies are more frequently considering and using electronic data collection (EDC) to collect patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction and quality of life for clinical trials. The transition from paper-and-pencil data collection to EDC is not without risks. The unique context of clinical trials presents challenges that, if not addressed, can lead to expensive mistakes. The advantages inherent to EDC can easily be cancelled out without careful attention to the characteristics of the clinical setting. This paper provides an overview of EDC issues specific to clinical trials and health care settings. In particular, it evaluates usability issues associated with methods of EDC and suggests strategies to minimize potential problems. Lessons learned from usability testing in the unique setting of the clinical trial can be applied to other projects to decrease costs, enhance the quality of the data, and minimize time to analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-385
Number of pages10
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Clinical Trials
Quality of Life
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Computer interface
  • Computer user training
  • Data collection
  • Medical informatics
  • Outcome assessment (health care)
  • Questionnaires
  • User

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Practical applications of usability theory to electronic data collection for clinical trials. / Schmier, Jordana K.; Kane, David W.; Halpern, Michael.

In: Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 26, No. 3, 06.2005, p. 376-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e358c24f0f5466ba3c314161600c6c5,
title = "Practical applications of usability theory to electronic data collection for clinical trials",
abstract = "Pharmaceutical and device companies are more frequently considering and using electronic data collection (EDC) to collect patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction and quality of life for clinical trials. The transition from paper-and-pencil data collection to EDC is not without risks. The unique context of clinical trials presents challenges that, if not addressed, can lead to expensive mistakes. The advantages inherent to EDC can easily be cancelled out without careful attention to the characteristics of the clinical setting. This paper provides an overview of EDC issues specific to clinical trials and health care settings. In particular, it evaluates usability issues associated with methods of EDC and suggests strategies to minimize potential problems. Lessons learned from usability testing in the unique setting of the clinical trial can be applied to other projects to decrease costs, enhance the quality of the data, and minimize time to analysis.",
keywords = "Computer interface, Computer user training, Data collection, Medical informatics, Outcome assessment (health care), Questionnaires, User",
author = "Schmier, {Jordana K.} and Kane, {David W.} and Michael Halpern",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.cct.2005.01.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "376--385",
journal = "Contemporary Clinical Trials",
issn = "1551-7144",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical applications of usability theory to electronic data collection for clinical trials

AU - Schmier, Jordana K.

AU - Kane, David W.

AU - Halpern, Michael

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Pharmaceutical and device companies are more frequently considering and using electronic data collection (EDC) to collect patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction and quality of life for clinical trials. The transition from paper-and-pencil data collection to EDC is not without risks. The unique context of clinical trials presents challenges that, if not addressed, can lead to expensive mistakes. The advantages inherent to EDC can easily be cancelled out without careful attention to the characteristics of the clinical setting. This paper provides an overview of EDC issues specific to clinical trials and health care settings. In particular, it evaluates usability issues associated with methods of EDC and suggests strategies to minimize potential problems. Lessons learned from usability testing in the unique setting of the clinical trial can be applied to other projects to decrease costs, enhance the quality of the data, and minimize time to analysis.

AB - Pharmaceutical and device companies are more frequently considering and using electronic data collection (EDC) to collect patient-reported outcomes such as satisfaction and quality of life for clinical trials. The transition from paper-and-pencil data collection to EDC is not without risks. The unique context of clinical trials presents challenges that, if not addressed, can lead to expensive mistakes. The advantages inherent to EDC can easily be cancelled out without careful attention to the characteristics of the clinical setting. This paper provides an overview of EDC issues specific to clinical trials and health care settings. In particular, it evaluates usability issues associated with methods of EDC and suggests strategies to minimize potential problems. Lessons learned from usability testing in the unique setting of the clinical trial can be applied to other projects to decrease costs, enhance the quality of the data, and minimize time to analysis.

KW - Computer interface

KW - Computer user training

KW - Data collection

KW - Medical informatics

KW - Outcome assessment (health care)

KW - Questionnaires

KW - User

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19444374963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19444374963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2005.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2005.01.012

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 376

EP - 385

JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials

JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials

SN - 1551-7144

IS - 3

ER -