Practical guidelines to minimise language and cognitive confounds in the diagnosis of CAPD: a brief tutorial

Gail D. Chermak, Doris Eva Bamiou, Vasiliki (Vivian) Iliadou, Frank Musiek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To provide audiologists with strategies to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). Design: Tutorial. Study sample: None. Results: Strategies are reviewed to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose CAPD. Conclusions: Differential diagnosis is exceedingly important and can be quite challenging. Distinguishing between two or more conditions presenting with similar symptoms or attributes requires multidisciplinary, comprehensive assessment. To ensure appropriate interventions, the audiologist is a member of the multidisciplinary team responsible for determining whether there is an auditory component to other presenting deficits or whether one condition is responsible for the symptoms seen in another. Choice of tests should be guided both by the symptoms of the affected individual, as established in an in-depth interview and case history, the individual’s age and primary language, and by the specific deficits reported to be associated with specific clinical presentations. Knowing which tests are available, their strengths and limitations, the processes assessed, task and response requirements, and the areas of the central auditory nervous system (CANS) to which each test is most sensitive provides the audiologist with critical information to assist in the differential diagnostic process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Audiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 27 2017

Fingerprint

Language Development Disorders
Language
Guidelines
deficit
language
Auditory Cortex
diagnostic
Differential Diagnosis
Central Nervous System
Interviews
interview
Audiologists
Central Auditory Processing Disorder
Tutorial
Cognitive Processing
Language Processing
Hearing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Practical guidelines to minimise language and cognitive confounds in the diagnosis of CAPD : a brief tutorial. / Chermak, Gail D.; Bamiou, Doris Eva; (Vivian) Iliadou, Vasiliki; Musiek, Frank.

In: International Journal of Audiology, 27.02.2017, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a7529dc5ebb44d28eb3901b27b598bf,
title = "Practical guidelines to minimise language and cognitive confounds in the diagnosis of CAPD: a brief tutorial",
abstract = "Objective: To provide audiologists with strategies to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). Design: Tutorial. Study sample: None. Results: Strategies are reviewed to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose CAPD. Conclusions: Differential diagnosis is exceedingly important and can be quite challenging. Distinguishing between two or more conditions presenting with similar symptoms or attributes requires multidisciplinary, comprehensive assessment. To ensure appropriate interventions, the audiologist is a member of the multidisciplinary team responsible for determining whether there is an auditory component to other presenting deficits or whether one condition is responsible for the symptoms seen in another. Choice of tests should be guided both by the symptoms of the affected individual, as established in an in-depth interview and case history, the individual’s age and primary language, and by the specific deficits reported to be associated with specific clinical presentations. Knowing which tests are available, their strengths and limitations, the processes assessed, task and response requirements, and the areas of the central auditory nervous system (CANS) to which each test is most sensitive provides the audiologist with critical information to assist in the differential diagnostic process.",
author = "Chermak, {Gail D.} and Bamiou, {Doris Eva} and {(Vivian) Iliadou}, Vasiliki and Frank Musiek",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1080/14992027.2017.1284351",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "International Journal of Audiology",
issn = "1499-2027",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical guidelines to minimise language and cognitive confounds in the diagnosis of CAPD

T2 - a brief tutorial

AU - Chermak, Gail D.

AU - Bamiou, Doris Eva

AU - (Vivian) Iliadou, Vasiliki

AU - Musiek, Frank

PY - 2017/2/27

Y1 - 2017/2/27

N2 - Objective: To provide audiologists with strategies to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). Design: Tutorial. Study sample: None. Results: Strategies are reviewed to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose CAPD. Conclusions: Differential diagnosis is exceedingly important and can be quite challenging. Distinguishing between two or more conditions presenting with similar symptoms or attributes requires multidisciplinary, comprehensive assessment. To ensure appropriate interventions, the audiologist is a member of the multidisciplinary team responsible for determining whether there is an auditory component to other presenting deficits or whether one condition is responsible for the symptoms seen in another. Choice of tests should be guided both by the symptoms of the affected individual, as established in an in-depth interview and case history, the individual’s age and primary language, and by the specific deficits reported to be associated with specific clinical presentations. Knowing which tests are available, their strengths and limitations, the processes assessed, task and response requirements, and the areas of the central auditory nervous system (CANS) to which each test is most sensitive provides the audiologist with critical information to assist in the differential diagnostic process.

AB - Objective: To provide audiologists with strategies to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose central auditory processing disorder (CAPD). Design: Tutorial. Study sample: None. Results: Strategies are reviewed to minimise confounding cognitive and language processing variables and accurately diagnose CAPD. Conclusions: Differential diagnosis is exceedingly important and can be quite challenging. Distinguishing between two or more conditions presenting with similar symptoms or attributes requires multidisciplinary, comprehensive assessment. To ensure appropriate interventions, the audiologist is a member of the multidisciplinary team responsible for determining whether there is an auditory component to other presenting deficits or whether one condition is responsible for the symptoms seen in another. Choice of tests should be guided both by the symptoms of the affected individual, as established in an in-depth interview and case history, the individual’s age and primary language, and by the specific deficits reported to be associated with specific clinical presentations. Knowing which tests are available, their strengths and limitations, the processes assessed, task and response requirements, and the areas of the central auditory nervous system (CANS) to which each test is most sensitive provides the audiologist with critical information to assist in the differential diagnostic process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014568988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014568988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14992027.2017.1284351

DO - 10.1080/14992027.2017.1284351

M3 - Article

C2 - 28635503

AN - SCOPUS:85014568988

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - International Journal of Audiology

JF - International Journal of Audiology

SN - 1499-2027

ER -