Practical structural reliability techniques

Bilal M. Ayyub, Achintya Haldar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

118 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Commonly-used structural reliability models are reviewed, and the advantages and limitations of each method are discussed with the help of a practical example. A pressure vessel is designed against wind loading. This example is selected because the limit state equation is nonlinear and the wind speed has an extremely skewed distribution. Although the First-Order Second- Moment may be sufficient in many problems, the risk involved may still be unknown, even in a relative sense, unless the limit state equation is linear and all the variables are normal. In that sense, the Advanced Second-Moment method has several advantages. It yields probabilities of failure similar to the variance reduction techniques, at least for the pressure vessel example considered here. If simulation techniques are used to study a problem, some kind of variance reduction technique should be used for economic reasons. For the complicated example considered here, the Conditional Expectation plus Antithetic Variates variance reduction technique is found to be the most efficient. The Monte Carlo Simulation technique is modified to make the simulation more efficient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1707-1724
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Structural Engineering (United States)
Volume110
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pressure vessels
Method of moments
Linear equations
Nonlinear equations
Economics
Monte Carlo simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Building and Construction
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Practical structural reliability techniques. / Ayyub, Bilal M.; Haldar, Achintya.

In: Journal of Structural Engineering (United States), Vol. 110, No. 8, 1984, p. 1707-1724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bd6ed7e62d3b473983678cbf8075400a,
title = "Practical structural reliability techniques",
abstract = "Commonly-used structural reliability models are reviewed, and the advantages and limitations of each method are discussed with the help of a practical example. A pressure vessel is designed against wind loading. This example is selected because the limit state equation is nonlinear and the wind speed has an extremely skewed distribution. Although the First-Order Second- Moment may be sufficient in many problems, the risk involved may still be unknown, even in a relative sense, unless the limit state equation is linear and all the variables are normal. In that sense, the Advanced Second-Moment method has several advantages. It yields probabilities of failure similar to the variance reduction techniques, at least for the pressure vessel example considered here. If simulation techniques are used to study a problem, some kind of variance reduction technique should be used for economic reasons. For the complicated example considered here, the Conditional Expectation plus Antithetic Variates variance reduction technique is found to be the most efficient. The Monte Carlo Simulation technique is modified to make the simulation more efficient.",
author = "Ayyub, {Bilal M.} and Achintya Haldar",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:8(1707)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "1707--1724",
journal = "Journal of Structural Engineering",
issn = "0733-9445",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical structural reliability techniques

AU - Ayyub, Bilal M.

AU - Haldar, Achintya

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Commonly-used structural reliability models are reviewed, and the advantages and limitations of each method are discussed with the help of a practical example. A pressure vessel is designed against wind loading. This example is selected because the limit state equation is nonlinear and the wind speed has an extremely skewed distribution. Although the First-Order Second- Moment may be sufficient in many problems, the risk involved may still be unknown, even in a relative sense, unless the limit state equation is linear and all the variables are normal. In that sense, the Advanced Second-Moment method has several advantages. It yields probabilities of failure similar to the variance reduction techniques, at least for the pressure vessel example considered here. If simulation techniques are used to study a problem, some kind of variance reduction technique should be used for economic reasons. For the complicated example considered here, the Conditional Expectation plus Antithetic Variates variance reduction technique is found to be the most efficient. The Monte Carlo Simulation technique is modified to make the simulation more efficient.

AB - Commonly-used structural reliability models are reviewed, and the advantages and limitations of each method are discussed with the help of a practical example. A pressure vessel is designed against wind loading. This example is selected because the limit state equation is nonlinear and the wind speed has an extremely skewed distribution. Although the First-Order Second- Moment may be sufficient in many problems, the risk involved may still be unknown, even in a relative sense, unless the limit state equation is linear and all the variables are normal. In that sense, the Advanced Second-Moment method has several advantages. It yields probabilities of failure similar to the variance reduction techniques, at least for the pressure vessel example considered here. If simulation techniques are used to study a problem, some kind of variance reduction technique should be used for economic reasons. For the complicated example considered here, the Conditional Expectation plus Antithetic Variates variance reduction technique is found to be the most efficient. The Monte Carlo Simulation technique is modified to make the simulation more efficient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021477106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021477106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:8(1707)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:8(1707)

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0021477106

VL - 110

SP - 1707

EP - 1724

JO - Journal of Structural Engineering

JF - Journal of Structural Engineering

SN - 0733-9445

IS - 8

ER -