Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice

Fred Janssen, Hanna Westbroek, Walter Doyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

In his article “Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder,” Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)—“principled know-how and know-why”—to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)176-186
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Learning Sciences
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this