Practicality Studies

How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice

Fred Janssen, Hanna Westbroek, Walter - Doyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In his article “Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder,” Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)—“principled know-how and know-why”—to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)176-186
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Learning Sciences
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2015

Fingerprint

Learning
teacher
know how
heuristics
innovation
Heuristics
learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Practicality Studies : How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice. / Janssen, Fred; Westbroek, Hanna; Doyle, Walter -.

In: Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 24, No. 1, 02.01.2015, p. 176-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1e4c9258f2547e9bc0e4258a2bb4f21,
title = "Practicality Studies: How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice",
abstract = "In his article “Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder,” Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)—“principled know-how and know-why”—to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.",
author = "Fred Janssen and Hanna Westbroek and Doyle, {Walter -}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10508406.2014.954751",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "176--186",
journal = "Journal of the Learning Sciences",
issn = "1050-8406",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practicality Studies

T2 - How to Move From What Works in Principle to What Works in Practice

AU - Janssen, Fred

AU - Westbroek, Hanna

AU - Doyle, Walter -

PY - 2015/1/2

Y1 - 2015/1/2

N2 - In his article “Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder,” Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)—“principled know-how and know-why”—to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.

AB - In his article “Principled Practical Knowledge: Not a Bridge but a Ladder,” Carl Bereiter (2014) argues that theoretical knowledge is too shallow to support the generation of innovative learning activities. He makes a case for principled practical knowledge (PPK)—“principled know-how and know-why”—to fulfill this practical generative role. We argue and illustrate in this commentary that PPK as portrayed by Bereiter does not offer much practical guidance for 2 potential users: professional designers and teachers. For professional designers PPK should be further specified in order to fulfill its generative role. But even this enriched form of PPK still does not suffice to address the challenging issues of practicality teachers face. We explain the magnitude and dimensions that underlie practicality in the everyday work of teachers and suggest how recent work on fast and frugal heuristics can contribute to helping teachers to make instructional innovations practical.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927168392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927168392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10508406.2014.954751

DO - 10.1080/10508406.2014.954751

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 176

EP - 186

JO - Journal of the Learning Sciences

JF - Journal of the Learning Sciences

SN - 1050-8406

IS - 1

ER -