Predicting Affective Responses to Unexpected Outcomes

Richard Coughlan, Terence Connolly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In decisions under uncertainty, decision makers confront two uncertainties: the uncertain linkage between actions and outcomes and the uncertain linkage between these outcomes and his or her affective responses to them. The two studies reported here examine affective responses to expected and unexpected outcomes in various settings. In Study 1, a scenario-based laboratory experiment (N = 149), we examined subjects' predicted responses to a range of outcomes, as a function of how surprising the outcome was. Study 2, a field study (N = 127), involved the expectations of bowlers about their scores in an upcoming game and about their responses to various outcomes at, above, and below expectations. We also measured actual affective reactions after the bowlers had completed their games. Findings suggest that subjects both expect and experience a loss-averse, expectation-based value function broadly of the Prospect Theory type. They also anticipate, and experience, an amplifying effect of outcome surprise, though they underestimate its size. We argue that such underestimation, together with overtight prediction ranges, may expose subjects to much larger affective variation with outcome variability than they anticipate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)211-225
Number of pages15
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume85
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2001

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Linkage

Keywords

  • Affect; outcome; prediction; surprise; decision making.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Psychology(all)
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Predicting Affective Responses to Unexpected Outcomes. / Coughlan, Richard; Connolly, Terence.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 85, No. 2, 07.2001, p. 211-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef8a1ec2e6c540ecbc271bca390af8ba,
title = "Predicting Affective Responses to Unexpected Outcomes",
abstract = "In decisions under uncertainty, decision makers confront two uncertainties: the uncertain linkage between actions and outcomes and the uncertain linkage between these outcomes and his or her affective responses to them. The two studies reported here examine affective responses to expected and unexpected outcomes in various settings. In Study 1, a scenario-based laboratory experiment (N = 149), we examined subjects' predicted responses to a range of outcomes, as a function of how surprising the outcome was. Study 2, a field study (N = 127), involved the expectations of bowlers about their scores in an upcoming game and about their responses to various outcomes at, above, and below expectations. We also measured actual affective reactions after the bowlers had completed their games. Findings suggest that subjects both expect and experience a loss-averse, expectation-based value function broadly of the Prospect Theory type. They also anticipate, and experience, an amplifying effect of outcome surprise, though they underestimate its size. We argue that such underestimation, together with overtight prediction ranges, may expose subjects to much larger affective variation with outcome variability than they anticipate.",
keywords = "Affect; outcome; prediction; surprise; decision making.",
author = "Richard Coughlan and Terence Connolly",
year = "2001",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1006/obhd.2000.2939",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "211--225",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting Affective Responses to Unexpected Outcomes

AU - Coughlan, Richard

AU - Connolly, Terence

PY - 2001/7

Y1 - 2001/7

N2 - In decisions under uncertainty, decision makers confront two uncertainties: the uncertain linkage between actions and outcomes and the uncertain linkage between these outcomes and his or her affective responses to them. The two studies reported here examine affective responses to expected and unexpected outcomes in various settings. In Study 1, a scenario-based laboratory experiment (N = 149), we examined subjects' predicted responses to a range of outcomes, as a function of how surprising the outcome was. Study 2, a field study (N = 127), involved the expectations of bowlers about their scores in an upcoming game and about their responses to various outcomes at, above, and below expectations. We also measured actual affective reactions after the bowlers had completed their games. Findings suggest that subjects both expect and experience a loss-averse, expectation-based value function broadly of the Prospect Theory type. They also anticipate, and experience, an amplifying effect of outcome surprise, though they underestimate its size. We argue that such underestimation, together with overtight prediction ranges, may expose subjects to much larger affective variation with outcome variability than they anticipate.

AB - In decisions under uncertainty, decision makers confront two uncertainties: the uncertain linkage between actions and outcomes and the uncertain linkage between these outcomes and his or her affective responses to them. The two studies reported here examine affective responses to expected and unexpected outcomes in various settings. In Study 1, a scenario-based laboratory experiment (N = 149), we examined subjects' predicted responses to a range of outcomes, as a function of how surprising the outcome was. Study 2, a field study (N = 127), involved the expectations of bowlers about their scores in an upcoming game and about their responses to various outcomes at, above, and below expectations. We also measured actual affective reactions after the bowlers had completed their games. Findings suggest that subjects both expect and experience a loss-averse, expectation-based value function broadly of the Prospect Theory type. They also anticipate, and experience, an amplifying effect of outcome surprise, though they underestimate its size. We argue that such underestimation, together with overtight prediction ranges, may expose subjects to much larger affective variation with outcome variability than they anticipate.

KW - Affect; outcome; prediction; surprise; decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0013122912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0013122912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/obhd.2000.2939

DO - 10.1006/obhd.2000.2939

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0013122912

VL - 85

SP - 211

EP - 225

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

IS - 2

ER -