Predicting asthma using clinical indexes

Jose A. Castro-Rodriguez, Lorena Cifuentes, Fernando Martinez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Asthma is no longer considered a single disease, but a common label for a set of heterogeneous conditions with shared clinical symptoms but associated with different cellular and molecular mechanisms. Several wheezing phenotypes coexist at preschool age but not all preschoolers with recurrent wheezing develop asthma at school-age; and since at the present no accurate single screening test using genetic or biochemical markers has been developed to determine which preschooler with recurrent wheezing will have asthma at school age, the asthma diagnosis still needs to be based on clinical predicted models or scores. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing and most frequently used asthma predicting models, to discuss their advantages/disadvantages, and their accomplishment on all the necessary consecutive steps for any predictive model. Seven most popular asthma predictive models were reviewed (original API, Isle of Wight, PIAMA, modified API, ucAPI, APT Leicestersher, and ademAPI). Among these, the original API has a good positive LR∼7.4 (increases the probability of a prediction of asthma by 2-7 times), and it is also simple: it only requires four clinical parameters and a peripheral blood sample for eosinophil count. It is thus an easy model to use in any rural or urban health care system. However, because its negative LR is not good, it cannot be used to rule out the development of asthma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number320
JournalFrontiers in Pediatrics
Volume7
Issue numberJULY
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Asthma
Respiratory Sounds
Urban Health
Rural Health
Genetic Markers
Eosinophils
Biomarkers
Delivery of Health Care
Phenotype

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Asthma predictive index
  • Biomarkers
  • Predictive models
  • Preschool
  • Recurrent wheezing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Predicting asthma using clinical indexes. / Castro-Rodriguez, Jose A.; Cifuentes, Lorena; Martinez, Fernando.

In: Frontiers in Pediatrics, Vol. 7, No. JULY, 320, 01.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Castro-Rodriguez, Jose A. ; Cifuentes, Lorena ; Martinez, Fernando. / Predicting asthma using clinical indexes. In: Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2019 ; Vol. 7, No. JULY.
@article{421bbdf739774674931fc87802cc1a4b,
title = "Predicting asthma using clinical indexes",
abstract = "Asthma is no longer considered a single disease, but a common label for a set of heterogeneous conditions with shared clinical symptoms but associated with different cellular and molecular mechanisms. Several wheezing phenotypes coexist at preschool age but not all preschoolers with recurrent wheezing develop asthma at school-age; and since at the present no accurate single screening test using genetic or biochemical markers has been developed to determine which preschooler with recurrent wheezing will have asthma at school age, the asthma diagnosis still needs to be based on clinical predicted models or scores. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing and most frequently used asthma predicting models, to discuss their advantages/disadvantages, and their accomplishment on all the necessary consecutive steps for any predictive model. Seven most popular asthma predictive models were reviewed (original API, Isle of Wight, PIAMA, modified API, ucAPI, APT Leicestersher, and ademAPI). Among these, the original API has a good positive LR∼7.4 (increases the probability of a prediction of asthma by 2-7 times), and it is also simple: it only requires four clinical parameters and a peripheral blood sample for eosinophil count. It is thus an easy model to use in any rural or urban health care system. However, because its negative LR is not good, it cannot be used to rule out the development of asthma.",
keywords = "Asthma, Asthma predictive index, Biomarkers, Predictive models, Preschool, Recurrent wheezing",
author = "Castro-Rodriguez, {Jose A.} and Lorena Cifuentes and Fernando Martinez",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fped.2019.00320",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Frontiers in Pediatrics",
issn = "2296-2360",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "JULY",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting asthma using clinical indexes

AU - Castro-Rodriguez, Jose A.

AU - Cifuentes, Lorena

AU - Martinez, Fernando

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Asthma is no longer considered a single disease, but a common label for a set of heterogeneous conditions with shared clinical symptoms but associated with different cellular and molecular mechanisms. Several wheezing phenotypes coexist at preschool age but not all preschoolers with recurrent wheezing develop asthma at school-age; and since at the present no accurate single screening test using genetic or biochemical markers has been developed to determine which preschooler with recurrent wheezing will have asthma at school age, the asthma diagnosis still needs to be based on clinical predicted models or scores. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing and most frequently used asthma predicting models, to discuss their advantages/disadvantages, and their accomplishment on all the necessary consecutive steps for any predictive model. Seven most popular asthma predictive models were reviewed (original API, Isle of Wight, PIAMA, modified API, ucAPI, APT Leicestersher, and ademAPI). Among these, the original API has a good positive LR∼7.4 (increases the probability of a prediction of asthma by 2-7 times), and it is also simple: it only requires four clinical parameters and a peripheral blood sample for eosinophil count. It is thus an easy model to use in any rural or urban health care system. However, because its negative LR is not good, it cannot be used to rule out the development of asthma.

AB - Asthma is no longer considered a single disease, but a common label for a set of heterogeneous conditions with shared clinical symptoms but associated with different cellular and molecular mechanisms. Several wheezing phenotypes coexist at preschool age but not all preschoolers with recurrent wheezing develop asthma at school-age; and since at the present no accurate single screening test using genetic or biochemical markers has been developed to determine which preschooler with recurrent wheezing will have asthma at school age, the asthma diagnosis still needs to be based on clinical predicted models or scores. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing and most frequently used asthma predicting models, to discuss their advantages/disadvantages, and their accomplishment on all the necessary consecutive steps for any predictive model. Seven most popular asthma predictive models were reviewed (original API, Isle of Wight, PIAMA, modified API, ucAPI, APT Leicestersher, and ademAPI). Among these, the original API has a good positive LR∼7.4 (increases the probability of a prediction of asthma by 2-7 times), and it is also simple: it only requires four clinical parameters and a peripheral blood sample for eosinophil count. It is thus an easy model to use in any rural or urban health care system. However, because its negative LR is not good, it cannot be used to rule out the development of asthma.

KW - Asthma

KW - Asthma predictive index

KW - Biomarkers

KW - Predictive models

KW - Preschool

KW - Recurrent wheezing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070840185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070840185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fped.2019.00320

DO - 10.3389/fped.2019.00320

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85070840185

VL - 7

JO - Frontiers in Pediatrics

JF - Frontiers in Pediatrics

SN - 2296-2360

IS - JULY

M1 - 320

ER -