Predicting blood pressure outcomes using single-item physician-administered measures: A retrospective pooled analysis of observational studies in Belgium

Lorenzo Villa, Diana Sun, Kris Denhaerynck, Stefaan Vancayzeele, Heidi Brié, Christine Hermans, Ann Aerts, Michael Levengood, Karen MacDonald, Ivo L Abraham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Patient adherence is often not monitored because existing methods of evaluating adherence are either burdensome or do not accurately predict treatment outcomes. Aim To examine whether two simple, single-item physician-administered measures of patient adherence to antihypertensive medication are predictive of blood pressure outcomes. Design and setting Retrospective database analysis of patients with hypertension treated in Belgian primary care. Method Using pooled data from five observational studies, a sample was identified of 9725 patients who were assessed using two single-item physician-administered measures of adherence to antihypertensive medication: the first item of the Basel Assessment of Adherence Scale (BAAS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). These two assessment tools were administered by GPs during regular appointments with patients. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and combined SBP/DBP were measured at baseline and at 90 days. Results BAAS-identified adherent patients achieved lower mean SBP and DBP compared with nonadherent patients at 90 days ( P<0.001), and had odds ratios of achieving blood pressure control of 0.66 (95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.61 to 0.73, P<0.001) for SBP, 0.69 (95% CI = 0.62 to 0.76, P<0.001) for DBP, and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.59 to 0.72, P<0.001) for combined SBP/DBP. For VAS-identified adherent patients, the odds ratios of achieving blood pressure control were 0.93 (95% CI = 0.86 to 1.00, P<0.001) for SBP, 0.79 (95% CI = 0.73 to 0.85, P<0.001) for DBP, and 0.91 (95% CI?=?0.84 to 0.99, P<0.001) for combined SBP/DBP. Conclusions The first item of the BAAS and the VAS are independent predictors of blood pressure control. These methods can be integrated seamlessly into routine clinical practice by allowing GPs to quickly evaluate a patient's adherence and tailor treatment recommendations accordingly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e9-e15
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume65
Issue number630
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Belgium
Observational Studies
Blood Pressure
Physicians
Confidence Intervals
Patient Compliance
Visual Analog Scale
Antihypertensive Agents

Keywords

  • Hypertension
  • Medication adherence
  • Patient adherence
  • Primary health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Predicting blood pressure outcomes using single-item physician-administered measures : A retrospective pooled analysis of observational studies in Belgium. / Villa, Lorenzo; Sun, Diana; Denhaerynck, Kris; Vancayzeele, Stefaan; Brié, Heidi; Hermans, Christine; Aerts, Ann; Levengood, Michael; MacDonald, Karen; Abraham, Ivo L.

In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 65, No. 630, 01.01.2015, p. e9-e15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Villa, Lorenzo ; Sun, Diana ; Denhaerynck, Kris ; Vancayzeele, Stefaan ; Brié, Heidi ; Hermans, Christine ; Aerts, Ann ; Levengood, Michael ; MacDonald, Karen ; Abraham, Ivo L. / Predicting blood pressure outcomes using single-item physician-administered measures : A retrospective pooled analysis of observational studies in Belgium. In: British Journal of General Practice. 2015 ; Vol. 65, No. 630. pp. e9-e15.
@article{f84f609ce6934d2980f3d097dedad384,
title = "Predicting blood pressure outcomes using single-item physician-administered measures: A retrospective pooled analysis of observational studies in Belgium",
abstract = "Background Patient adherence is often not monitored because existing methods of evaluating adherence are either burdensome or do not accurately predict treatment outcomes. Aim To examine whether two simple, single-item physician-administered measures of patient adherence to antihypertensive medication are predictive of blood pressure outcomes. Design and setting Retrospective database analysis of patients with hypertension treated in Belgian primary care. Method Using pooled data from five observational studies, a sample was identified of 9725 patients who were assessed using two single-item physician-administered measures of adherence to antihypertensive medication: the first item of the Basel Assessment of Adherence Scale (BAAS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). These two assessment tools were administered by GPs during regular appointments with patients. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and combined SBP/DBP were measured at baseline and at 90 days. Results BAAS-identified adherent patients achieved lower mean SBP and DBP compared with nonadherent patients at 90 days ( P<0.001), and had odds ratios of achieving blood pressure control of 0.66 (95{\%} confidence intervals (CI) = 0.61 to 0.73, P<0.001) for SBP, 0.69 (95{\%} CI = 0.62 to 0.76, P<0.001) for DBP, and 0.65 (95{\%} CI = 0.59 to 0.72, P<0.001) for combined SBP/DBP. For VAS-identified adherent patients, the odds ratios of achieving blood pressure control were 0.93 (95{\%} CI = 0.86 to 1.00, P<0.001) for SBP, 0.79 (95{\%} CI = 0.73 to 0.85, P<0.001) for DBP, and 0.91 (95{\%} CI?=?0.84 to 0.99, P<0.001) for combined SBP/DBP. Conclusions The first item of the BAAS and the VAS are independent predictors of blood pressure control. These methods can be integrated seamlessly into routine clinical practice by allowing GPs to quickly evaluate a patient's adherence and tailor treatment recommendations accordingly.",
keywords = "Hypertension, Medication adherence, Patient adherence, Primary health care",
author = "Lorenzo Villa and Diana Sun and Kris Denhaerynck and Stefaan Vancayzeele and Heidi Bri{\'e} and Christine Hermans and Ann Aerts and Michael Levengood and Karen MacDonald and Abraham, {Ivo L}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3399/bjgp15X683101",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "e9--e15",
journal = "British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "630",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting blood pressure outcomes using single-item physician-administered measures

T2 - A retrospective pooled analysis of observational studies in Belgium

AU - Villa, Lorenzo

AU - Sun, Diana

AU - Denhaerynck, Kris

AU - Vancayzeele, Stefaan

AU - Brié, Heidi

AU - Hermans, Christine

AU - Aerts, Ann

AU - Levengood, Michael

AU - MacDonald, Karen

AU - Abraham, Ivo L

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background Patient adherence is often not monitored because existing methods of evaluating adherence are either burdensome or do not accurately predict treatment outcomes. Aim To examine whether two simple, single-item physician-administered measures of patient adherence to antihypertensive medication are predictive of blood pressure outcomes. Design and setting Retrospective database analysis of patients with hypertension treated in Belgian primary care. Method Using pooled data from five observational studies, a sample was identified of 9725 patients who were assessed using two single-item physician-administered measures of adherence to antihypertensive medication: the first item of the Basel Assessment of Adherence Scale (BAAS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). These two assessment tools were administered by GPs during regular appointments with patients. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and combined SBP/DBP were measured at baseline and at 90 days. Results BAAS-identified adherent patients achieved lower mean SBP and DBP compared with nonadherent patients at 90 days ( P<0.001), and had odds ratios of achieving blood pressure control of 0.66 (95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.61 to 0.73, P<0.001) for SBP, 0.69 (95% CI = 0.62 to 0.76, P<0.001) for DBP, and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.59 to 0.72, P<0.001) for combined SBP/DBP. For VAS-identified adherent patients, the odds ratios of achieving blood pressure control were 0.93 (95% CI = 0.86 to 1.00, P<0.001) for SBP, 0.79 (95% CI = 0.73 to 0.85, P<0.001) for DBP, and 0.91 (95% CI?=?0.84 to 0.99, P<0.001) for combined SBP/DBP. Conclusions The first item of the BAAS and the VAS are independent predictors of blood pressure control. These methods can be integrated seamlessly into routine clinical practice by allowing GPs to quickly evaluate a patient's adherence and tailor treatment recommendations accordingly.

AB - Background Patient adherence is often not monitored because existing methods of evaluating adherence are either burdensome or do not accurately predict treatment outcomes. Aim To examine whether two simple, single-item physician-administered measures of patient adherence to antihypertensive medication are predictive of blood pressure outcomes. Design and setting Retrospective database analysis of patients with hypertension treated in Belgian primary care. Method Using pooled data from five observational studies, a sample was identified of 9725 patients who were assessed using two single-item physician-administered measures of adherence to antihypertensive medication: the first item of the Basel Assessment of Adherence Scale (BAAS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). These two assessment tools were administered by GPs during regular appointments with patients. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and combined SBP/DBP were measured at baseline and at 90 days. Results BAAS-identified adherent patients achieved lower mean SBP and DBP compared with nonadherent patients at 90 days ( P<0.001), and had odds ratios of achieving blood pressure control of 0.66 (95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.61 to 0.73, P<0.001) for SBP, 0.69 (95% CI = 0.62 to 0.76, P<0.001) for DBP, and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.59 to 0.72, P<0.001) for combined SBP/DBP. For VAS-identified adherent patients, the odds ratios of achieving blood pressure control were 0.93 (95% CI = 0.86 to 1.00, P<0.001) for SBP, 0.79 (95% CI = 0.73 to 0.85, P<0.001) for DBP, and 0.91 (95% CI?=?0.84 to 0.99, P<0.001) for combined SBP/DBP. Conclusions The first item of the BAAS and the VAS are independent predictors of blood pressure control. These methods can be integrated seamlessly into routine clinical practice by allowing GPs to quickly evaluate a patient's adherence and tailor treatment recommendations accordingly.

KW - Hypertension

KW - Medication adherence

KW - Patient adherence

KW - Primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919969726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919969726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp15X683101

DO - 10.3399/bjgp15X683101

M3 - Article

C2 - 25548319

AN - SCOPUS:84919969726

VL - 65

SP - e9-e15

JO - British Journal of General Practice

JF - British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 630

ER -