Predicting others’ memory performance: The accuracy and bases of social metacognition

Jonathan G. Tullis, Scott H. Fraundorf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Successful teaching, effective advertising, and happy interpersonal relationships depend upon accurately anticipating what others will remember. Across three experiments, we tested how precisely subjects judged the mnemonic effectiveness of cues for supporting other subjects’ episodic memories. Some subjects generated cue-target word pairs and made judgments of learning (JOLs) for these word pairs while other subjects studied the pairs and made JOLs. Across all three experiments, subjects’ JOLs for others were more accurate than chance, but less accurate than subjects’ JOLs for themselves. Further, JOLs for others were similarly accurate across cues that subjects generated for others and cues that subjects read but did not themselves generate. Idiosyncratic cue generation processes impacted subjects’ JOLs for others; however, this bias was not the primary reason for the inaccuracy of JOLs for others. Rather, our results suggest that the accuracy of judgments about others’ memories suffers because people do not have access to the personal idiosyncrasies of others’ encoding and processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)124-137
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume95
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Data storage equipment
Learning
Cues
performance
Marketing
Teaching
Experiments
learning
Processing
Episodic Memory
Metacognition
Judgments of Learning
experiment
trend
Experiment

Keywords

  • Cue generation
  • Metacognition
  • Perspective-taking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

Predicting others’ memory performance : The accuracy and bases of social metacognition. / Tullis, Jonathan G.; Fraundorf, Scott H.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 95, 01.08.2017, p. 124-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{440f4f1de9f34087ad7a2b8a0b20ae7f,
title = "Predicting others’ memory performance: The accuracy and bases of social metacognition",
abstract = "Successful teaching, effective advertising, and happy interpersonal relationships depend upon accurately anticipating what others will remember. Across three experiments, we tested how precisely subjects judged the mnemonic effectiveness of cues for supporting other subjects’ episodic memories. Some subjects generated cue-target word pairs and made judgments of learning (JOLs) for these word pairs while other subjects studied the pairs and made JOLs. Across all three experiments, subjects’ JOLs for others were more accurate than chance, but less accurate than subjects’ JOLs for themselves. Further, JOLs for others were similarly accurate across cues that subjects generated for others and cues that subjects read but did not themselves generate. Idiosyncratic cue generation processes impacted subjects’ JOLs for others; however, this bias was not the primary reason for the inaccuracy of JOLs for others. Rather, our results suggest that the accuracy of judgments about others’ memories suffers because people do not have access to the personal idiosyncrasies of others’ encoding and processing.",
keywords = "Cue generation, Metacognition, Perspective-taking",
author = "Tullis, {Jonathan G.} and Fraundorf, {Scott H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "124--137",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting others’ memory performance

T2 - The accuracy and bases of social metacognition

AU - Tullis, Jonathan G.

AU - Fraundorf, Scott H.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Successful teaching, effective advertising, and happy interpersonal relationships depend upon accurately anticipating what others will remember. Across three experiments, we tested how precisely subjects judged the mnemonic effectiveness of cues for supporting other subjects’ episodic memories. Some subjects generated cue-target word pairs and made judgments of learning (JOLs) for these word pairs while other subjects studied the pairs and made JOLs. Across all three experiments, subjects’ JOLs for others were more accurate than chance, but less accurate than subjects’ JOLs for themselves. Further, JOLs for others were similarly accurate across cues that subjects generated for others and cues that subjects read but did not themselves generate. Idiosyncratic cue generation processes impacted subjects’ JOLs for others; however, this bias was not the primary reason for the inaccuracy of JOLs for others. Rather, our results suggest that the accuracy of judgments about others’ memories suffers because people do not have access to the personal idiosyncrasies of others’ encoding and processing.

AB - Successful teaching, effective advertising, and happy interpersonal relationships depend upon accurately anticipating what others will remember. Across three experiments, we tested how precisely subjects judged the mnemonic effectiveness of cues for supporting other subjects’ episodic memories. Some subjects generated cue-target word pairs and made judgments of learning (JOLs) for these word pairs while other subjects studied the pairs and made JOLs. Across all three experiments, subjects’ JOLs for others were more accurate than chance, but less accurate than subjects’ JOLs for themselves. Further, JOLs for others were similarly accurate across cues that subjects generated for others and cues that subjects read but did not themselves generate. Idiosyncratic cue generation processes impacted subjects’ JOLs for others; however, this bias was not the primary reason for the inaccuracy of JOLs for others. Rather, our results suggest that the accuracy of judgments about others’ memories suffers because people do not have access to the personal idiosyncrasies of others’ encoding and processing.

KW - Cue generation

KW - Metacognition

KW - Perspective-taking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015779384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015779384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85015779384

VL - 95

SP - 124

EP - 137

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

ER -