Prediction of NO 3-N losses in surface runoff from a field with seepage zones using GLEAMS and RZWQM

Adion Chinkuyu, Thomas Meixner, Timothy Gish, Amir P. Nejadhashemi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Seepage zones have been shown to be of critical importance in controlling contaminant export from agricultural watersheds. However, their impacts on water quality have not been effectively modeled. The Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems (GLEAMS) model and the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) were used to predict daily and monthly nitrate-nitrogen (NO 3-N) concentration and loss in surface runoff from an agricultural field with seepage zones. The results of the study show that calibrated GLEAMS and RZWQM predicted daily NO 3-N concentration [index of agreement (D) > 0.57] in surface runoff from the field with seepage zones. Based on the different model evaluation techniques used in this study, both GLEAMS and RZWQM performed fairly well in assessing the effects of seepage zones on daily NO 3-N losses in surface runoff. However, GLEAMS (D = 0.93) performed relatively better than RZWQM (D = 0.45) in predicting NO 3-N loss in surface runoff on a monthly basis, while both GLEAMS and RZWQM performed equally well in predicting NO 3-N loss in surface runoff on a daily basis. Both models performed poorly in predicting NO 3-N concentration in surface runoff on a monthly basis (D < 0.44). Additionally, since neither model adequately simulated monthly NO 3-N concentration in surface runoff from the field with seepage zones, their ability in water quality modeling for such fields will be compromised, and further model evaluation and development is justified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1779-1790
Number of pages12
JournalTransactions of the ASABE
Volume49
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Root Zone Water Quality Model
agricultural management
Water Quality
Groundwater
Seepage
seepage
Runoff
Water quality
management systems
rhizosphere
runoff
groundwater
water quality
prediction
GLEAMS model
agricultural watersheds
nitrate nitrogen
loss
effect
Nitrates

Keywords

  • Model
  • NO -N
  • OPE
  • Runoff
  • Watershed

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Food Science
  • Forestry
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Prediction of NO 3-N losses in surface runoff from a field with seepage zones using GLEAMS and RZWQM. / Chinkuyu, Adion; Meixner, Thomas; Gish, Timothy; Nejadhashemi, Amir P.

In: Transactions of the ASABE, Vol. 49, No. 6, 11.2006, p. 1779-1790.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chinkuyu, Adion ; Meixner, Thomas ; Gish, Timothy ; Nejadhashemi, Amir P. / Prediction of NO 3-N losses in surface runoff from a field with seepage zones using GLEAMS and RZWQM. In: Transactions of the ASABE. 2006 ; Vol. 49, No. 6. pp. 1779-1790.
@article{3f77b20bfd454fea950025d8ce0c9d62,
title = "Prediction of NO 3-N losses in surface runoff from a field with seepage zones using GLEAMS and RZWQM",
abstract = "Seepage zones have been shown to be of critical importance in controlling contaminant export from agricultural watersheds. However, their impacts on water quality have not been effectively modeled. The Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems (GLEAMS) model and the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) were used to predict daily and monthly nitrate-nitrogen (NO 3-N) concentration and loss in surface runoff from an agricultural field with seepage zones. The results of the study show that calibrated GLEAMS and RZWQM predicted daily NO 3-N concentration [index of agreement (D) > 0.57] in surface runoff from the field with seepage zones. Based on the different model evaluation techniques used in this study, both GLEAMS and RZWQM performed fairly well in assessing the effects of seepage zones on daily NO 3-N losses in surface runoff. However, GLEAMS (D = 0.93) performed relatively better than RZWQM (D = 0.45) in predicting NO 3-N loss in surface runoff on a monthly basis, while both GLEAMS and RZWQM performed equally well in predicting NO 3-N loss in surface runoff on a daily basis. Both models performed poorly in predicting NO 3-N concentration in surface runoff on a monthly basis (D < 0.44). Additionally, since neither model adequately simulated monthly NO 3-N concentration in surface runoff from the field with seepage zones, their ability in water quality modeling for such fields will be compromised, and further model evaluation and development is justified.",
keywords = "Model, NO -N, OPE, Runoff, Watershed",
author = "Adion Chinkuyu and Thomas Meixner and Timothy Gish and Nejadhashemi, {Amir P.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1779--1790",
journal = "Transactions of the ASABE",
issn = "2151-0032",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prediction of NO 3-N losses in surface runoff from a field with seepage zones using GLEAMS and RZWQM

AU - Chinkuyu, Adion

AU - Meixner, Thomas

AU - Gish, Timothy

AU - Nejadhashemi, Amir P.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Seepage zones have been shown to be of critical importance in controlling contaminant export from agricultural watersheds. However, their impacts on water quality have not been effectively modeled. The Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems (GLEAMS) model and the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) were used to predict daily and monthly nitrate-nitrogen (NO 3-N) concentration and loss in surface runoff from an agricultural field with seepage zones. The results of the study show that calibrated GLEAMS and RZWQM predicted daily NO 3-N concentration [index of agreement (D) > 0.57] in surface runoff from the field with seepage zones. Based on the different model evaluation techniques used in this study, both GLEAMS and RZWQM performed fairly well in assessing the effects of seepage zones on daily NO 3-N losses in surface runoff. However, GLEAMS (D = 0.93) performed relatively better than RZWQM (D = 0.45) in predicting NO 3-N loss in surface runoff on a monthly basis, while both GLEAMS and RZWQM performed equally well in predicting NO 3-N loss in surface runoff on a daily basis. Both models performed poorly in predicting NO 3-N concentration in surface runoff on a monthly basis (D < 0.44). Additionally, since neither model adequately simulated monthly NO 3-N concentration in surface runoff from the field with seepage zones, their ability in water quality modeling for such fields will be compromised, and further model evaluation and development is justified.

AB - Seepage zones have been shown to be of critical importance in controlling contaminant export from agricultural watersheds. However, their impacts on water quality have not been effectively modeled. The Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems (GLEAMS) model and the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM) were used to predict daily and monthly nitrate-nitrogen (NO 3-N) concentration and loss in surface runoff from an agricultural field with seepage zones. The results of the study show that calibrated GLEAMS and RZWQM predicted daily NO 3-N concentration [index of agreement (D) > 0.57] in surface runoff from the field with seepage zones. Based on the different model evaluation techniques used in this study, both GLEAMS and RZWQM performed fairly well in assessing the effects of seepage zones on daily NO 3-N losses in surface runoff. However, GLEAMS (D = 0.93) performed relatively better than RZWQM (D = 0.45) in predicting NO 3-N loss in surface runoff on a monthly basis, while both GLEAMS and RZWQM performed equally well in predicting NO 3-N loss in surface runoff on a daily basis. Both models performed poorly in predicting NO 3-N concentration in surface runoff on a monthly basis (D < 0.44). Additionally, since neither model adequately simulated monthly NO 3-N concentration in surface runoff from the field with seepage zones, their ability in water quality modeling for such fields will be compromised, and further model evaluation and development is justified.

KW - Model

KW - NO -N

KW - OPE

KW - Runoff

KW - Watershed

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947174755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947174755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33947174755

VL - 49

SP - 1779

EP - 1790

JO - Transactions of the ASABE

JF - Transactions of the ASABE

SN - 2151-0032

IS - 6

ER -