Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population based diabetes disease management program

Lawrence A. Lavery, David G Armstrong, Robert P. Wunderlich, Jeffrey Tredwell, Andrew J M Boulton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

177 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic plantar pressure assessment to determine patients at high risk for neuropathic ulceration. In choosing the cut point, we looked for an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity of plantar pressure to screen for neuropathic ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 1,666 consecutive individuals with diabetes (50.3% male) presenting to a large urban managed care-based outpatient clinic were enrolled in this longitudinal 2-year outcome study. Patients received a standardized medical and musculoskeletal assessment at the time of enrollment, including evaluation in an onsite gait laboratory. RESULTS - Of the entire population, 263 patients (15.8%) either presented with or developed an ulcer during the 24-month follow-up period. As expected, baseline peak plantar pressure was significantly higher in the ulcerated group than in the group who did not ulcerate (95.5 ± 26.4 vs. 85.1 ± 27.3 N/cm2, P < 0.001). There was also a trend toward increased pressure with increasing numbers of foot deformities, as well as with increasing foot risk classification (P = 0.0001). Peak pressure was not a suitable diagnostic tool by itself to identify high-risk patients. After eliminating patients without loss of protective sensation, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimal cut point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity, was 87.5 N/cm2, yielding a sensitivity of 63.5% and a specificity of 46.3%. CONCLUSIONS - The data from this evaluation continue to support the notion that elevated foot pressure is an important risk factor for foot complications. However, the ROC analysis suggests that foot pressure is a poor tool by itself to predict foot ulcers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1069-1073
Number of pages5
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disease Management
Foot
Pressure
Population
ROC Curve
Foot Ulcer
Foot Deformities
Sensitivity and Specificity
Managed Care Programs
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Gait
Ulcer
Research Design
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population based diabetes disease management program. / Lavery, Lawrence A.; Armstrong, David G; Wunderlich, Robert P.; Tredwell, Jeffrey; Boulton, Andrew J M.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.04.2003, p. 1069-1073.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lavery, Lawrence A. ; Armstrong, David G ; Wunderlich, Robert P. ; Tredwell, Jeffrey ; Boulton, Andrew J M. / Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population based diabetes disease management program. In: Diabetes Care. 2003 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 1069-1073.
@article{989e2dd7dd964c58bd57e158859987cf,
title = "Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population based diabetes disease management program",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic plantar pressure assessment to determine patients at high risk for neuropathic ulceration. In choosing the cut point, we looked for an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity of plantar pressure to screen for neuropathic ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 1,666 consecutive individuals with diabetes (50.3{\%} male) presenting to a large urban managed care-based outpatient clinic were enrolled in this longitudinal 2-year outcome study. Patients received a standardized medical and musculoskeletal assessment at the time of enrollment, including evaluation in an onsite gait laboratory. RESULTS - Of the entire population, 263 patients (15.8{\%}) either presented with or developed an ulcer during the 24-month follow-up period. As expected, baseline peak plantar pressure was significantly higher in the ulcerated group than in the group who did not ulcerate (95.5 ± 26.4 vs. 85.1 ± 27.3 N/cm2, P < 0.001). There was also a trend toward increased pressure with increasing numbers of foot deformities, as well as with increasing foot risk classification (P = 0.0001). Peak pressure was not a suitable diagnostic tool by itself to identify high-risk patients. After eliminating patients without loss of protective sensation, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimal cut point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity, was 87.5 N/cm2, yielding a sensitivity of 63.5{\%} and a specificity of 46.3{\%}. CONCLUSIONS - The data from this evaluation continue to support the notion that elevated foot pressure is an important risk factor for foot complications. However, the ROC analysis suggests that foot pressure is a poor tool by itself to predict foot ulcers.",
author = "Lavery, {Lawrence A.} and Armstrong, {David G} and Wunderlich, {Robert P.} and Jeffrey Tredwell and Boulton, {Andrew J M}",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2337/diacare.26.4.1069",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1069--1073",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population based diabetes disease management program

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

AU - Armstrong, David G

AU - Wunderlich, Robert P.

AU - Tredwell, Jeffrey

AU - Boulton, Andrew J M

PY - 2003/4/1

Y1 - 2003/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic plantar pressure assessment to determine patients at high risk for neuropathic ulceration. In choosing the cut point, we looked for an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity of plantar pressure to screen for neuropathic ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 1,666 consecutive individuals with diabetes (50.3% male) presenting to a large urban managed care-based outpatient clinic were enrolled in this longitudinal 2-year outcome study. Patients received a standardized medical and musculoskeletal assessment at the time of enrollment, including evaluation in an onsite gait laboratory. RESULTS - Of the entire population, 263 patients (15.8%) either presented with or developed an ulcer during the 24-month follow-up period. As expected, baseline peak plantar pressure was significantly higher in the ulcerated group than in the group who did not ulcerate (95.5 ± 26.4 vs. 85.1 ± 27.3 N/cm2, P < 0.001). There was also a trend toward increased pressure with increasing numbers of foot deformities, as well as with increasing foot risk classification (P = 0.0001). Peak pressure was not a suitable diagnostic tool by itself to identify high-risk patients. After eliminating patients without loss of protective sensation, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimal cut point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity, was 87.5 N/cm2, yielding a sensitivity of 63.5% and a specificity of 46.3%. CONCLUSIONS - The data from this evaluation continue to support the notion that elevated foot pressure is an important risk factor for foot complications. However, the ROC analysis suggests that foot pressure is a poor tool by itself to predict foot ulcers.

AB - OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic plantar pressure assessment to determine patients at high risk for neuropathic ulceration. In choosing the cut point, we looked for an optimum combination of sensitivity and specificity of plantar pressure to screen for neuropathic ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 1,666 consecutive individuals with diabetes (50.3% male) presenting to a large urban managed care-based outpatient clinic were enrolled in this longitudinal 2-year outcome study. Patients received a standardized medical and musculoskeletal assessment at the time of enrollment, including evaluation in an onsite gait laboratory. RESULTS - Of the entire population, 263 patients (15.8%) either presented with or developed an ulcer during the 24-month follow-up period. As expected, baseline peak plantar pressure was significantly higher in the ulcerated group than in the group who did not ulcerate (95.5 ± 26.4 vs. 85.1 ± 27.3 N/cm2, P < 0.001). There was also a trend toward increased pressure with increasing numbers of foot deformities, as well as with increasing foot risk classification (P = 0.0001). Peak pressure was not a suitable diagnostic tool by itself to identify high-risk patients. After eliminating patients without loss of protective sensation, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimal cut point, as determined by a balance of sensitivity and specificity, was 87.5 N/cm2, yielding a sensitivity of 63.5% and a specificity of 46.3%. CONCLUSIONS - The data from this evaluation continue to support the notion that elevated foot pressure is an important risk factor for foot complications. However, the ROC analysis suggests that foot pressure is a poor tool by itself to predict foot ulcers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041530280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041530280&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1069

DO - 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1069

M3 - Article

C2 - 12663575

AN - SCOPUS:0041530280

VL - 26

SP - 1069

EP - 1073

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 4

ER -