Preferable descriptive representatives

Will just any woman, black, or latino do?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

201 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A body of theoretical literature has developed that explains why historically disadvantaged groups should be represented by members of those groups. Such representatives are commonly referred to as descriptive representatives. This literature has also endorsed various institutional reforms aimed at increasing the number of descriptive representatives, e.g., party list quotas, racial districting, and proportional representation. However, this literature does not articulate criteria that should guide the selection of descriptive representatives to serve in these institutional positions. Indeed, some thinkers claim that such criteria cannot, or at least should not, be articulated. I argue that some descriptive representatives are preferable to others and that criteria for selecting preferable descriptive representatives can, and should, be articulated. Moreover, I recommend one such criterion: Preferable descriptive representatives possess strong mutual relationships with dispossessed subgroups of historically disadvantaged groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)729-743
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Political Science Review
Volume96
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2002

Fingerprint

proportional representation
Group
reform
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Preferable descriptive representatives : Will just any woman, black, or latino do? / Dovi, Suzanne L.

In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 96, No. 4, 12.2002, p. 729-743.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15cb2a28c1d44f938ec9351cd94cc278,
title = "Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, black, or latino do?",
abstract = "A body of theoretical literature has developed that explains why historically disadvantaged groups should be represented by members of those groups. Such representatives are commonly referred to as descriptive representatives. This literature has also endorsed various institutional reforms aimed at increasing the number of descriptive representatives, e.g., party list quotas, racial districting, and proportional representation. However, this literature does not articulate criteria that should guide the selection of descriptive representatives to serve in these institutional positions. Indeed, some thinkers claim that such criteria cannot, or at least should not, be articulated. I argue that some descriptive representatives are preferable to others and that criteria for selecting preferable descriptive representatives can, and should, be articulated. Moreover, I recommend one such criterion: Preferable descriptive representatives possess strong mutual relationships with dispossessed subgroups of historically disadvantaged groups.",
author = "Dovi, {Suzanne L}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "729--743",
journal = "American Political Science Review",
issn = "0003-0554",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preferable descriptive representatives

T2 - Will just any woman, black, or latino do?

AU - Dovi, Suzanne L

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - A body of theoretical literature has developed that explains why historically disadvantaged groups should be represented by members of those groups. Such representatives are commonly referred to as descriptive representatives. This literature has also endorsed various institutional reforms aimed at increasing the number of descriptive representatives, e.g., party list quotas, racial districting, and proportional representation. However, this literature does not articulate criteria that should guide the selection of descriptive representatives to serve in these institutional positions. Indeed, some thinkers claim that such criteria cannot, or at least should not, be articulated. I argue that some descriptive representatives are preferable to others and that criteria for selecting preferable descriptive representatives can, and should, be articulated. Moreover, I recommend one such criterion: Preferable descriptive representatives possess strong mutual relationships with dispossessed subgroups of historically disadvantaged groups.

AB - A body of theoretical literature has developed that explains why historically disadvantaged groups should be represented by members of those groups. Such representatives are commonly referred to as descriptive representatives. This literature has also endorsed various institutional reforms aimed at increasing the number of descriptive representatives, e.g., party list quotas, racial districting, and proportional representation. However, this literature does not articulate criteria that should guide the selection of descriptive representatives to serve in these institutional positions. Indeed, some thinkers claim that such criteria cannot, or at least should not, be articulated. I argue that some descriptive representatives are preferable to others and that criteria for selecting preferable descriptive representatives can, and should, be articulated. Moreover, I recommend one such criterion: Preferable descriptive representatives possess strong mutual relationships with dispossessed subgroups of historically disadvantaged groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036946568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036946568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 729

EP - 743

JO - American Political Science Review

JF - American Political Science Review

SN - 0003-0554

IS - 4

ER -