Preshospital cricothyrotomy

An investigation of indications, technique, complications, and patient outcome

Daniel W Spaite, Maralee Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The records of all patients who presented to a Level 1 trauma center during a two-year period for whom a prehospital cricothyrotomy was attempted or ordered were reviewed. Twenty patients met the study critieria. The average age was 37 years (range, 11 to 65 years). Indications for prehospital cricothyrotomy were massive facial trauma (eight), failed oral intubation (seven), and suspected cervical spine injury (one). Cricothyrotomy was attempted in 16 patients (80%), with the remaining four having the procedure ordered but not attempted. A successful airway was achieved in 14 patients (88%). Horizontal incisions were used in all cases and were anatomically correct in 15 of 16 attempts (94%). The overall immediate complication rate was 31%. Two patients (12%) sustained major complications (failure to obtain an airway). No hemorrhagic complications occurred, but 16 of the 20 were in cardiac arrest in the field. Long-term complications were not evaluated. All patients sustained major injuries (mean Injury Severity Score, 53.7), except one patient who suffered airway obstruction from food. Three patients (15%) survived; two of the three suffered permanent, severe brain dysfunction. These preliminary findings demonstrate that prehospital cricothyrotomy is being used chiefly in massively injured patients who are already beyond recovery. It is thus difficult to assess whether the procedure is either safe or effective. There is a need for further investigation to determine whether prehospital cricothyrotomy has any beneficial effect on outcome and, if so, in what setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-285
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Trauma Centers
Airway Obstruction
Heart Arrest
Intubation
Spine
Food
Brain

Keywords

  • cricothyrotomy
  • prehospital

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Preshospital cricothyrotomy : An investigation of indications, technique, complications, and patient outcome. / Spaite, Daniel W; Joseph, Maralee.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1990, p. 279-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2bb55eb90170408b952968fb70e548d2,
title = "Preshospital cricothyrotomy: An investigation of indications, technique, complications, and patient outcome",
abstract = "The records of all patients who presented to a Level 1 trauma center during a two-year period for whom a prehospital cricothyrotomy was attempted or ordered were reviewed. Twenty patients met the study critieria. The average age was 37 years (range, 11 to 65 years). Indications for prehospital cricothyrotomy were massive facial trauma (eight), failed oral intubation (seven), and suspected cervical spine injury (one). Cricothyrotomy was attempted in 16 patients (80{\%}), with the remaining four having the procedure ordered but not attempted. A successful airway was achieved in 14 patients (88{\%}). Horizontal incisions were used in all cases and were anatomically correct in 15 of 16 attempts (94{\%}). The overall immediate complication rate was 31{\%}. Two patients (12{\%}) sustained major complications (failure to obtain an airway). No hemorrhagic complications occurred, but 16 of the 20 were in cardiac arrest in the field. Long-term complications were not evaluated. All patients sustained major injuries (mean Injury Severity Score, 53.7), except one patient who suffered airway obstruction from food. Three patients (15{\%}) survived; two of the three suffered permanent, severe brain dysfunction. These preliminary findings demonstrate that prehospital cricothyrotomy is being used chiefly in massively injured patients who are already beyond recovery. It is thus difficult to assess whether the procedure is either safe or effective. There is a need for further investigation to determine whether prehospital cricothyrotomy has any beneficial effect on outcome and, if so, in what setting.",
keywords = "cricothyrotomy, prehospital",
author = "Spaite, {Daniel W} and Maralee Joseph",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82045-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "279--285",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preshospital cricothyrotomy

T2 - An investigation of indications, technique, complications, and patient outcome

AU - Spaite, Daniel W

AU - Joseph, Maralee

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - The records of all patients who presented to a Level 1 trauma center during a two-year period for whom a prehospital cricothyrotomy was attempted or ordered were reviewed. Twenty patients met the study critieria. The average age was 37 years (range, 11 to 65 years). Indications for prehospital cricothyrotomy were massive facial trauma (eight), failed oral intubation (seven), and suspected cervical spine injury (one). Cricothyrotomy was attempted in 16 patients (80%), with the remaining four having the procedure ordered but not attempted. A successful airway was achieved in 14 patients (88%). Horizontal incisions were used in all cases and were anatomically correct in 15 of 16 attempts (94%). The overall immediate complication rate was 31%. Two patients (12%) sustained major complications (failure to obtain an airway). No hemorrhagic complications occurred, but 16 of the 20 were in cardiac arrest in the field. Long-term complications were not evaluated. All patients sustained major injuries (mean Injury Severity Score, 53.7), except one patient who suffered airway obstruction from food. Three patients (15%) survived; two of the three suffered permanent, severe brain dysfunction. These preliminary findings demonstrate that prehospital cricothyrotomy is being used chiefly in massively injured patients who are already beyond recovery. It is thus difficult to assess whether the procedure is either safe or effective. There is a need for further investigation to determine whether prehospital cricothyrotomy has any beneficial effect on outcome and, if so, in what setting.

AB - The records of all patients who presented to a Level 1 trauma center during a two-year period for whom a prehospital cricothyrotomy was attempted or ordered were reviewed. Twenty patients met the study critieria. The average age was 37 years (range, 11 to 65 years). Indications for prehospital cricothyrotomy were massive facial trauma (eight), failed oral intubation (seven), and suspected cervical spine injury (one). Cricothyrotomy was attempted in 16 patients (80%), with the remaining four having the procedure ordered but not attempted. A successful airway was achieved in 14 patients (88%). Horizontal incisions were used in all cases and were anatomically correct in 15 of 16 attempts (94%). The overall immediate complication rate was 31%. Two patients (12%) sustained major complications (failure to obtain an airway). No hemorrhagic complications occurred, but 16 of the 20 were in cardiac arrest in the field. Long-term complications were not evaluated. All patients sustained major injuries (mean Injury Severity Score, 53.7), except one patient who suffered airway obstruction from food. Three patients (15%) survived; two of the three suffered permanent, severe brain dysfunction. These preliminary findings demonstrate that prehospital cricothyrotomy is being used chiefly in massively injured patients who are already beyond recovery. It is thus difficult to assess whether the procedure is either safe or effective. There is a need for further investigation to determine whether prehospital cricothyrotomy has any beneficial effect on outcome and, if so, in what setting.

KW - cricothyrotomy

KW - prehospital

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025137828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025137828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82045-1

DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82045-1

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 279

EP - 285

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 3

ER -