Pressure support compensation for inspiratory work due to endotracheal tubes and demand continuous positive airway pressure.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

124 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated the use of pressure support to compensate for the added inspiratory work of breathing due to the resistances of endotracheal tubes and a ventilator demand-valve system for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). A mechanical model was used to simulate spontaneous breathing at five respiratory rates through 7-mm, 8-mm, and 9-mm endotracheal tubes with and without a ventilator demand CPAP circuit. Added work was measured as the integral of the product of airway pressure and volume during inspiration. Additional work was a function of the tube's size, and each 1-mm decrease in the tube's diameter resulted in a 67 to 100 percent increase in work. Adding the ventilator CPAP circuit further increased work and was responsible for 30 to 50 percent of the total work resulting from a tube and CPAP circuit together. Pressure support was added to a level at which net work on the airway was zero, and a relationship between mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI) and the optimal level of pressure support was established for each endotracheal tube. The inspiratory work of breathing was then measured in normal subjects breathing with and without each endotracheal tube plus the demand CPAP circuit. Work per liter of minute ventilation due to the endotracheal tube and CPAP circuit was increased from 54 to 240 percent over levels measured while breathing through an open airway. For each endotracheal tube and VT/TI, a level of pressure support (range, 2 to 20 cm H2O) was found which eliminated added work in the spontaneously breathing subject. This level correlated well with that predicted from the data derived using the mechanical model. We conclude that when adjusting for an endotracheal tube's diameter and VT/TI, pressure support can be used to compensate for the added inspiratory work due to artificial airway resistances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)499-505
Number of pages7
JournalChest
Volume93
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1988

Fingerprint

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Pressure
Respiration
Mechanical Ventilators
Work of Breathing
Airway Resistance
Respiratory Rate
Ventilation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Pressure support compensation for inspiratory work due to endotracheal tubes and demand continuous positive airway pressure. / Fiastro, J. F.; Habib, Michael P; Quan, Stuart F.

In: Chest, Vol. 93, No. 3, 03.1988, p. 499-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b0517b3991ab41838bcccd3ad59a39e6,
title = "Pressure support compensation for inspiratory work due to endotracheal tubes and demand continuous positive airway pressure.",
abstract = "We evaluated the use of pressure support to compensate for the added inspiratory work of breathing due to the resistances of endotracheal tubes and a ventilator demand-valve system for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). A mechanical model was used to simulate spontaneous breathing at five respiratory rates through 7-mm, 8-mm, and 9-mm endotracheal tubes with and without a ventilator demand CPAP circuit. Added work was measured as the integral of the product of airway pressure and volume during inspiration. Additional work was a function of the tube's size, and each 1-mm decrease in the tube's diameter resulted in a 67 to 100 percent increase in work. Adding the ventilator CPAP circuit further increased work and was responsible for 30 to 50 percent of the total work resulting from a tube and CPAP circuit together. Pressure support was added to a level at which net work on the airway was zero, and a relationship between mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI) and the optimal level of pressure support was established for each endotracheal tube. The inspiratory work of breathing was then measured in normal subjects breathing with and without each endotracheal tube plus the demand CPAP circuit. Work per liter of minute ventilation due to the endotracheal tube and CPAP circuit was increased from 54 to 240 percent over levels measured while breathing through an open airway. For each endotracheal tube and VT/TI, a level of pressure support (range, 2 to 20 cm H2O) was found which eliminated added work in the spontaneously breathing subject. This level correlated well with that predicted from the data derived using the mechanical model. We conclude that when adjusting for an endotracheal tube's diameter and VT/TI, pressure support can be used to compensate for the added inspiratory work due to artificial airway resistances.",
author = "Fiastro, {J. F.} and Habib, {Michael P} and Quan, {Stuart F}",
year = "1988",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "499--505",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pressure support compensation for inspiratory work due to endotracheal tubes and demand continuous positive airway pressure.

AU - Fiastro, J. F.

AU - Habib, Michael P

AU - Quan, Stuart F

PY - 1988/3

Y1 - 1988/3

N2 - We evaluated the use of pressure support to compensate for the added inspiratory work of breathing due to the resistances of endotracheal tubes and a ventilator demand-valve system for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). A mechanical model was used to simulate spontaneous breathing at five respiratory rates through 7-mm, 8-mm, and 9-mm endotracheal tubes with and without a ventilator demand CPAP circuit. Added work was measured as the integral of the product of airway pressure and volume during inspiration. Additional work was a function of the tube's size, and each 1-mm decrease in the tube's diameter resulted in a 67 to 100 percent increase in work. Adding the ventilator CPAP circuit further increased work and was responsible for 30 to 50 percent of the total work resulting from a tube and CPAP circuit together. Pressure support was added to a level at which net work on the airway was zero, and a relationship between mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI) and the optimal level of pressure support was established for each endotracheal tube. The inspiratory work of breathing was then measured in normal subjects breathing with and without each endotracheal tube plus the demand CPAP circuit. Work per liter of minute ventilation due to the endotracheal tube and CPAP circuit was increased from 54 to 240 percent over levels measured while breathing through an open airway. For each endotracheal tube and VT/TI, a level of pressure support (range, 2 to 20 cm H2O) was found which eliminated added work in the spontaneously breathing subject. This level correlated well with that predicted from the data derived using the mechanical model. We conclude that when adjusting for an endotracheal tube's diameter and VT/TI, pressure support can be used to compensate for the added inspiratory work due to artificial airway resistances.

AB - We evaluated the use of pressure support to compensate for the added inspiratory work of breathing due to the resistances of endotracheal tubes and a ventilator demand-valve system for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). A mechanical model was used to simulate spontaneous breathing at five respiratory rates through 7-mm, 8-mm, and 9-mm endotracheal tubes with and without a ventilator demand CPAP circuit. Added work was measured as the integral of the product of airway pressure and volume during inspiration. Additional work was a function of the tube's size, and each 1-mm decrease in the tube's diameter resulted in a 67 to 100 percent increase in work. Adding the ventilator CPAP circuit further increased work and was responsible for 30 to 50 percent of the total work resulting from a tube and CPAP circuit together. Pressure support was added to a level at which net work on the airway was zero, and a relationship between mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI) and the optimal level of pressure support was established for each endotracheal tube. The inspiratory work of breathing was then measured in normal subjects breathing with and without each endotracheal tube plus the demand CPAP circuit. Work per liter of minute ventilation due to the endotracheal tube and CPAP circuit was increased from 54 to 240 percent over levels measured while breathing through an open airway. For each endotracheal tube and VT/TI, a level of pressure support (range, 2 to 20 cm H2O) was found which eliminated added work in the spontaneously breathing subject. This level correlated well with that predicted from the data derived using the mechanical model. We conclude that when adjusting for an endotracheal tube's diameter and VT/TI, pressure support can be used to compensate for the added inspiratory work due to artificial airway resistances.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023974822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023974822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3277803

AN - SCOPUS:0023974822

VL - 93

SP - 499

EP - 505

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 3

ER -