Pretexts and US foreign policy: the war on terrorism in historical perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyzes the way that US foreign policy élites have used pretexts to manage public opinion. Policymakers, it is argued, often seize upon threatening external events, and use these events to create a favorable political climate in which to “sell” policies of militarization and external expansion to the public. The article argues that the Bush administration has used the threat of terrorism as a pretext to implement a wide range of policies that had been decided upon in advance of the 9/11 attacks. It also argues that the recent uses of pretexts by the Bush administration have strong historical precedents: extended case studies of pretexts are presented for the events surrounding the Korea crisis of 1950 and the Afghanistan crisis of 1979–1980, as well as the more recent War on Terrorism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-321
Number of pages29
JournalNew Political Science
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

foreign policy
terrorism
event
militarization
Afghanistan
Korea
public opinion
climate
threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Pretexts and US foreign policy : the war on terrorism in historical perspective. / Gibbs, David N.

In: New Political Science, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.01.2004, p. 293-321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a794c38edd7c40c7851ebe9a8c00d142,
title = "Pretexts and US foreign policy: the war on terrorism in historical perspective",
abstract = "This article analyzes the way that US foreign policy {\'e}lites have used pretexts to manage public opinion. Policymakers, it is argued, often seize upon threatening external events, and use these events to create a favorable political climate in which to “sell” policies of militarization and external expansion to the public. The article argues that the Bush administration has used the threat of terrorism as a pretext to implement a wide range of policies that had been decided upon in advance of the 9/11 attacks. It also argues that the recent uses of pretexts by the Bush administration have strong historical precedents: extended case studies of pretexts are presented for the events surrounding the Korea crisis of 1950 and the Afghanistan crisis of 1979–1980, as well as the more recent War on Terrorism.",
author = "Gibbs, {David N}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0739314042000251298",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "293--321",
journal = "New Political Science",
issn = "0739-3148",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pretexts and US foreign policy

T2 - the war on terrorism in historical perspective

AU - Gibbs, David N

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - This article analyzes the way that US foreign policy élites have used pretexts to manage public opinion. Policymakers, it is argued, often seize upon threatening external events, and use these events to create a favorable political climate in which to “sell” policies of militarization and external expansion to the public. The article argues that the Bush administration has used the threat of terrorism as a pretext to implement a wide range of policies that had been decided upon in advance of the 9/11 attacks. It also argues that the recent uses of pretexts by the Bush administration have strong historical precedents: extended case studies of pretexts are presented for the events surrounding the Korea crisis of 1950 and the Afghanistan crisis of 1979–1980, as well as the more recent War on Terrorism.

AB - This article analyzes the way that US foreign policy élites have used pretexts to manage public opinion. Policymakers, it is argued, often seize upon threatening external events, and use these events to create a favorable political climate in which to “sell” policies of militarization and external expansion to the public. The article argues that the Bush administration has used the threat of terrorism as a pretext to implement a wide range of policies that had been decided upon in advance of the 9/11 attacks. It also argues that the recent uses of pretexts by the Bush administration have strong historical precedents: extended case studies of pretexts are presented for the events surrounding the Korea crisis of 1950 and the Afghanistan crisis of 1979–1980, as well as the more recent War on Terrorism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049431820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049431820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0739314042000251298

DO - 10.1080/0739314042000251298

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049431820

VL - 26

SP - 293

EP - 321

JO - New Political Science

JF - New Political Science

SN - 0739-3148

IS - 3

ER -