Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines

Jesse N. Nodora, William D. Martz, Erin L. Ashbeck, Elizabeth T Jacobs, Patricia A. Thompson, María Elena Martínez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess self-reported compliance to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines among primary care physicians (PCPs) and to assess physician and practice characteristics associated with reported compliance. Methods: Survey data from 984 PCPs in Arizona were used. Self-reported CRC screening practices, recommendations, and compliance with guidelines were assessed. Physician and practice characteristics associated with guideline compliance were also evaluated. Results: While 77.5% of physicians reported using national screening guidelines, only 51.7% reported recommendations consistent with the guidelines. Younger physicians were significantly more likely to report compliance with screening guidelines (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.07-2.10) as were female clinicians (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.11-1.92). Physicians practicing in solo (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.19-0.58), group (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.21-0.62), or community health centers (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.81) were significantly less likely to report following guidelines as compared to those in academic practice. Guideline compliance was higher for fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (65.0%) than colonoscopy (56.7%); overuse of screening for these modalities was reported among 34.4% of physicians. Conclusions: PCPs are not adequately following CRC screening guidelines. Further studies are needed to clarify the reasons for this lack of compliance, especially as guidelines become more complex.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1277-1287
Number of pages11
JournalCancer Causes and Control
Volume22
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Primary Care Physicians
Early Detection of Cancer
Colorectal Neoplasms
Guidelines
Physicians
Compliance
Community Health Centers
Occult Blood
Hematologic Tests
Colonoscopy

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Compliance
  • Fecal occult blood test
  • Guidelines
  • Primary care physicians
  • Screening
  • Sigmoidoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Nodora, J. N., Martz, W. D., Ashbeck, E. L., Jacobs, E. T., Thompson, P. A., & Martínez, M. E. (2011). Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines. Cancer Causes and Control, 22(9), 1277-1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-011-9801-0

Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines. / Nodora, Jesse N.; Martz, William D.; Ashbeck, Erin L.; Jacobs, Elizabeth T; Thompson, Patricia A.; Martínez, María Elena.

In: Cancer Causes and Control, Vol. 22, No. 9, 09.2011, p. 1277-1287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nodora, JN, Martz, WD, Ashbeck, EL, Jacobs, ET, Thompson, PA & Martínez, ME 2011, 'Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines', Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1277-1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-011-9801-0
Nodora, Jesse N. ; Martz, William D. ; Ashbeck, Erin L. ; Jacobs, Elizabeth T ; Thompson, Patricia A. ; Martínez, María Elena. / Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines. In: Cancer Causes and Control. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 9. pp. 1277-1287.
@article{4e6577424bcf4e3b837e39ba0031282a,
title = "Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines",
abstract = "Objective: To assess self-reported compliance to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines among primary care physicians (PCPs) and to assess physician and practice characteristics associated with reported compliance. Methods: Survey data from 984 PCPs in Arizona were used. Self-reported CRC screening practices, recommendations, and compliance with guidelines were assessed. Physician and practice characteristics associated with guideline compliance were also evaluated. Results: While 77.5{\%} of physicians reported using national screening guidelines, only 51.7{\%} reported recommendations consistent with the guidelines. Younger physicians were significantly more likely to report compliance with screening guidelines (OR = 1.50, 95{\%} CI = 1.07-2.10) as were female clinicians (OR = 1.46, 95{\%} CI = 1.11-1.92). Physicians practicing in solo (OR = 0.33, 95{\%} CI = 0.19-0.58), group (OR = 0.36, 95{\%} CI = 0.21-0.62), or community health centers (OR = 0.37, 95{\%} CI = 0.17-0.81) were significantly less likely to report following guidelines as compared to those in academic practice. Guideline compliance was higher for fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (65.0{\%}) than colonoscopy (56.7{\%}); overuse of screening for these modalities was reported among 34.4{\%} of physicians. Conclusions: PCPs are not adequately following CRC screening guidelines. Further studies are needed to clarify the reasons for this lack of compliance, especially as guidelines become more complex.",
keywords = "Colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer, Compliance, Fecal occult blood test, Guidelines, Primary care physicians, Screening, Sigmoidoscopy",
author = "Nodora, {Jesse N.} and Martz, {William D.} and Ashbeck, {Erin L.} and Jacobs, {Elizabeth T} and Thompson, {Patricia A.} and Mart{\'i}nez, {Mar{\'i}a Elena}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10552-011-9801-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1277--1287",
journal = "Cancer Causes and Control",
issn = "0957-5243",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines

AU - Nodora, Jesse N.

AU - Martz, William D.

AU - Ashbeck, Erin L.

AU - Jacobs, Elizabeth T

AU - Thompson, Patricia A.

AU - Martínez, María Elena

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Objective: To assess self-reported compliance to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines among primary care physicians (PCPs) and to assess physician and practice characteristics associated with reported compliance. Methods: Survey data from 984 PCPs in Arizona were used. Self-reported CRC screening practices, recommendations, and compliance with guidelines were assessed. Physician and practice characteristics associated with guideline compliance were also evaluated. Results: While 77.5% of physicians reported using national screening guidelines, only 51.7% reported recommendations consistent with the guidelines. Younger physicians were significantly more likely to report compliance with screening guidelines (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.07-2.10) as were female clinicians (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.11-1.92). Physicians practicing in solo (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.19-0.58), group (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.21-0.62), or community health centers (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.81) were significantly less likely to report following guidelines as compared to those in academic practice. Guideline compliance was higher for fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (65.0%) than colonoscopy (56.7%); overuse of screening for these modalities was reported among 34.4% of physicians. Conclusions: PCPs are not adequately following CRC screening guidelines. Further studies are needed to clarify the reasons for this lack of compliance, especially as guidelines become more complex.

AB - Objective: To assess self-reported compliance to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines among primary care physicians (PCPs) and to assess physician and practice characteristics associated with reported compliance. Methods: Survey data from 984 PCPs in Arizona were used. Self-reported CRC screening practices, recommendations, and compliance with guidelines were assessed. Physician and practice characteristics associated with guideline compliance were also evaluated. Results: While 77.5% of physicians reported using national screening guidelines, only 51.7% reported recommendations consistent with the guidelines. Younger physicians were significantly more likely to report compliance with screening guidelines (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.07-2.10) as were female clinicians (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.11-1.92). Physicians practicing in solo (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.19-0.58), group (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.21-0.62), or community health centers (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17-0.81) were significantly less likely to report following guidelines as compared to those in academic practice. Guideline compliance was higher for fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (65.0%) than colonoscopy (56.7%); overuse of screening for these modalities was reported among 34.4% of physicians. Conclusions: PCPs are not adequately following CRC screening guidelines. Further studies are needed to clarify the reasons for this lack of compliance, especially as guidelines become more complex.

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Compliance

KW - Fecal occult blood test

KW - Guidelines

KW - Primary care physicians

KW - Screening

KW - Sigmoidoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052324054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052324054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10552-011-9801-0

DO - 10.1007/s10552-011-9801-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 21710193

AN - SCOPUS:80052324054

VL - 22

SP - 1277

EP - 1287

JO - Cancer Causes and Control

JF - Cancer Causes and Control

SN - 0957-5243

IS - 9

ER -