Primary surgical therapy of ovarian cancer: How much and when

Mark E. Potter, Edward E. Partridge, Kenneth D Hatch, Seng Jaw Soong, J. Max Austin, Hugh M. Shingleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

126 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From July 1975 through December 1985, 328 patients with ovarian malignancies were treated. Of these, 302 had epithelial invasive malignancies and constitute the study group. The impact of the operative procedure, findings, and subsequent treatment is evaluated. Patients who underwent extensive debulking procedures such as bowel resection and peritoneal stripping did not have improved survival compared with those patients who did not undergo these procedures and yet had residual disease remaining (P = 0.7 and P = 0.34). Reoperating patients felt to be unresectable at the time of referral did not increase survival over reoperating patients after an attempt at chemotherapeutic reduction (P = 0.34).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-200
Number of pages6
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ovarian Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Survival
Operative Surgical Procedures
Neoplasms
Referral and Consultation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Potter, M. E., Partridge, E. E., Hatch, K. D., Soong, S. J., Austin, J. M., & Shingleton, H. M. (1990). Primary surgical therapy of ovarian cancer: How much and when. Gynecologic Oncology, 40(3), 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(90)90277-R

Primary surgical therapy of ovarian cancer : How much and when. / Potter, Mark E.; Partridge, Edward E.; Hatch, Kenneth D; Soong, Seng Jaw; Austin, J. Max; Shingleton, Hugh M.

In: Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1990, p. 195-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Potter, ME, Partridge, EE, Hatch, KD, Soong, SJ, Austin, JM & Shingleton, HM 1990, 'Primary surgical therapy of ovarian cancer: How much and when', Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(90)90277-R
Potter, Mark E. ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Hatch, Kenneth D ; Soong, Seng Jaw ; Austin, J. Max ; Shingleton, Hugh M. / Primary surgical therapy of ovarian cancer : How much and when. In: Gynecologic Oncology. 1990 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 195-200.
@article{bf45f036bf524f09966069d042f009f4,
title = "Primary surgical therapy of ovarian cancer: How much and when",
abstract = "From July 1975 through December 1985, 328 patients with ovarian malignancies were treated. Of these, 302 had epithelial invasive malignancies and constitute the study group. The impact of the operative procedure, findings, and subsequent treatment is evaluated. Patients who underwent extensive debulking procedures such as bowel resection and peritoneal stripping did not have improved survival compared with those patients who did not undergo these procedures and yet had residual disease remaining (P = 0.7 and P = 0.34). Reoperating patients felt to be unresectable at the time of referral did not increase survival over reoperating patients after an attempt at chemotherapeutic reduction (P = 0.34).",
author = "Potter, {Mark E.} and Partridge, {Edward E.} and Hatch, {Kenneth D} and Soong, {Seng Jaw} and Austin, {J. Max} and Shingleton, {Hugh M.}",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/0090-8258(90)90277-R",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "195--200",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary surgical therapy of ovarian cancer

T2 - How much and when

AU - Potter, Mark E.

AU - Partridge, Edward E.

AU - Hatch, Kenneth D

AU - Soong, Seng Jaw

AU - Austin, J. Max

AU - Shingleton, Hugh M.

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - From July 1975 through December 1985, 328 patients with ovarian malignancies were treated. Of these, 302 had epithelial invasive malignancies and constitute the study group. The impact of the operative procedure, findings, and subsequent treatment is evaluated. Patients who underwent extensive debulking procedures such as bowel resection and peritoneal stripping did not have improved survival compared with those patients who did not undergo these procedures and yet had residual disease remaining (P = 0.7 and P = 0.34). Reoperating patients felt to be unresectable at the time of referral did not increase survival over reoperating patients after an attempt at chemotherapeutic reduction (P = 0.34).

AB - From July 1975 through December 1985, 328 patients with ovarian malignancies were treated. Of these, 302 had epithelial invasive malignancies and constitute the study group. The impact of the operative procedure, findings, and subsequent treatment is evaluated. Patients who underwent extensive debulking procedures such as bowel resection and peritoneal stripping did not have improved survival compared with those patients who did not undergo these procedures and yet had residual disease remaining (P = 0.7 and P = 0.34). Reoperating patients felt to be unresectable at the time of referral did not increase survival over reoperating patients after an attempt at chemotherapeutic reduction (P = 0.34).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025905556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025905556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90277-R

DO - 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90277-R

M3 - Article

C2 - 2013440

AN - SCOPUS:0025905556

VL - 40

SP - 195

EP - 200

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 3

ER -