Principals as Bricoleurs

Making Sense and Making Do in an Era of Accountability

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The study investigates the ways in which principals engage with, and attend to, the data-driven accountability measures of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and local mandates. Theoretical framework: The study is framed with the notion of assemblage, a term often associated with actor-network theory (ANT)-a theory that focuses analytic attention on how disparate actors, material, and discursive practices come together to form dynamic associations. Within the assemblage, principals are situated as bricoleurs.Research methods and data: Data for analysis come from interviews conducted with 45 New York City principals between June 2005 and October 2008 as part of a larger ethnographic study examining NCLB, and a series of interviews with 12 of the 45 principals, conducted annually through March 2012. District surveys, various documents, and field notes of participant observation also inform the study. Findings: Principals play active policy roles in negotiating federal regulations and local initiatives, as well as selectively performing assessment and accountability mandates. Principals, who have often been cast in the media as either dupes of the state or as active resistors, negotiate and appropriate external accountability in innovative, sometimes savvy, ways. Implications for practice and research: Principals need to consider institutional circumstances and external accountability not as boundaries or constraints, but rather as available material with which to respond. Future research should aim to examine the ways in which principals engage with data and accountability demands via reflexive interactions with different types of knowledge, mediating artifacts, and methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)279-304
Number of pages26
JournalEducational Administration Quarterly
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

responsibility
actor-network-theory
interview
participant observation
research method
artifact
district
regulation
interaction

Keywords

  • accountability
  • ethnography
  • policy
  • principals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Principals as Bricoleurs : Making Sense and Making Do in an Era of Accountability. / Koyama, Jill -.

In: Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2014, p. 279-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{14ae9b0cd9e148ceb0f07d0a25136fc1,
title = "Principals as Bricoleurs: Making Sense and Making Do in an Era of Accountability",
abstract = "Purpose: The study investigates the ways in which principals engage with, and attend to, the data-driven accountability measures of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and local mandates. Theoretical framework: The study is framed with the notion of assemblage, a term often associated with actor-network theory (ANT)-a theory that focuses analytic attention on how disparate actors, material, and discursive practices come together to form dynamic associations. Within the assemblage, principals are situated as bricoleurs.Research methods and data: Data for analysis come from interviews conducted with 45 New York City principals between June 2005 and October 2008 as part of a larger ethnographic study examining NCLB, and a series of interviews with 12 of the 45 principals, conducted annually through March 2012. District surveys, various documents, and field notes of participant observation also inform the study. Findings: Principals play active policy roles in negotiating federal regulations and local initiatives, as well as selectively performing assessment and accountability mandates. Principals, who have often been cast in the media as either dupes of the state or as active resistors, negotiate and appropriate external accountability in innovative, sometimes savvy, ways. Implications for practice and research: Principals need to consider institutional circumstances and external accountability not as boundaries or constraints, but rather as available material with which to respond. Future research should aim to examine the ways in which principals engage with data and accountability demands via reflexive interactions with different types of knowledge, mediating artifacts, and methods.",
keywords = "accountability, ethnography, policy, principals",
author = "Koyama, {Jill -}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0013161X13492796",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "279--304",
journal = "Educational Administration Quarterly",
issn = "0013-161X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Principals as Bricoleurs

T2 - Making Sense and Making Do in an Era of Accountability

AU - Koyama, Jill -

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: The study investigates the ways in which principals engage with, and attend to, the data-driven accountability measures of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and local mandates. Theoretical framework: The study is framed with the notion of assemblage, a term often associated with actor-network theory (ANT)-a theory that focuses analytic attention on how disparate actors, material, and discursive practices come together to form dynamic associations. Within the assemblage, principals are situated as bricoleurs.Research methods and data: Data for analysis come from interviews conducted with 45 New York City principals between June 2005 and October 2008 as part of a larger ethnographic study examining NCLB, and a series of interviews with 12 of the 45 principals, conducted annually through March 2012. District surveys, various documents, and field notes of participant observation also inform the study. Findings: Principals play active policy roles in negotiating federal regulations and local initiatives, as well as selectively performing assessment and accountability mandates. Principals, who have often been cast in the media as either dupes of the state or as active resistors, negotiate and appropriate external accountability in innovative, sometimes savvy, ways. Implications for practice and research: Principals need to consider institutional circumstances and external accountability not as boundaries or constraints, but rather as available material with which to respond. Future research should aim to examine the ways in which principals engage with data and accountability demands via reflexive interactions with different types of knowledge, mediating artifacts, and methods.

AB - Purpose: The study investigates the ways in which principals engage with, and attend to, the data-driven accountability measures of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and local mandates. Theoretical framework: The study is framed with the notion of assemblage, a term often associated with actor-network theory (ANT)-a theory that focuses analytic attention on how disparate actors, material, and discursive practices come together to form dynamic associations. Within the assemblage, principals are situated as bricoleurs.Research methods and data: Data for analysis come from interviews conducted with 45 New York City principals between June 2005 and October 2008 as part of a larger ethnographic study examining NCLB, and a series of interviews with 12 of the 45 principals, conducted annually through March 2012. District surveys, various documents, and field notes of participant observation also inform the study. Findings: Principals play active policy roles in negotiating federal regulations and local initiatives, as well as selectively performing assessment and accountability mandates. Principals, who have often been cast in the media as either dupes of the state or as active resistors, negotiate and appropriate external accountability in innovative, sometimes savvy, ways. Implications for practice and research: Principals need to consider institutional circumstances and external accountability not as boundaries or constraints, but rather as available material with which to respond. Future research should aim to examine the ways in which principals engage with data and accountability demands via reflexive interactions with different types of knowledge, mediating artifacts, and methods.

KW - accountability

KW - ethnography

KW - policy

KW - principals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898862051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898862051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0013161X13492796

DO - 10.1177/0013161X13492796

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 279

EP - 304

JO - Educational Administration Quarterly

JF - Educational Administration Quarterly

SN - 0013-161X

IS - 2

ER -