Principles for controlling agents: The political economy of network structure

H Brinton Milward, Keith G. Provan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

105 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors of this article have developed a preliminary theory of network effectiveness wherein the unit of analysis is not the organization but the ties between the parts of a network of organizations that jointly produce a service (Provan and Milward 1995). This theory and the study that produced it differ from most studies of interorganizational relations and networks in that it has a performance-based dependent variable. The leading text in the field of public organizations, Hal G. Rainey's Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (1996, 140), calls the article "particularly important [for] new insights and direction for research and thought on effectiveness of government services. . . ." The conclusions, which were based on a four-city study, were that the most effective community mental health network was not flexible or adaptive. The most effective network was controlled by a monopoly provider that dominated both service provision and the terms under which mental health services and funding were provided by other agencies. Most notably, this nonprofit agency had veto power over government contracts with other providers regarding services for mental illness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-221
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Volume8
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 1998

Fingerprint

political economy
mental health
monopoly
mental illness
service provider
health service
funding
Network structure
Political economy
organization
community
performance
Public organizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Principles for controlling agents : The political economy of network structure. / Milward, H Brinton; Provan, Keith G.

In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 8, No. 2, 04.1998, p. 203-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5c7dda80f0254db7914f90ddc7dee4da,
title = "Principles for controlling agents: The political economy of network structure",
abstract = "The authors of this article have developed a preliminary theory of network effectiveness wherein the unit of analysis is not the organization but the ties between the parts of a network of organizations that jointly produce a service (Provan and Milward 1995). This theory and the study that produced it differ from most studies of interorganizational relations and networks in that it has a performance-based dependent variable. The leading text in the field of public organizations, Hal G. Rainey's Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (1996, 140), calls the article {"}particularly important [for] new insights and direction for research and thought on effectiveness of government services. . . .{"} The conclusions, which were based on a four-city study, were that the most effective community mental health network was not flexible or adaptive. The most effective network was controlled by a monopoly provider that dominated both service provision and the terms under which mental health services and funding were provided by other agencies. Most notably, this nonprofit agency had veto power over government contracts with other providers regarding services for mental illness.",
author = "Milward, {H Brinton} and Provan, {Keith G.}",
year = "1998",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "203--221",
journal = "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory",
issn = "1053-1858",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Principles for controlling agents

T2 - The political economy of network structure

AU - Milward, H Brinton

AU - Provan, Keith G.

PY - 1998/4

Y1 - 1998/4

N2 - The authors of this article have developed a preliminary theory of network effectiveness wherein the unit of analysis is not the organization but the ties between the parts of a network of organizations that jointly produce a service (Provan and Milward 1995). This theory and the study that produced it differ from most studies of interorganizational relations and networks in that it has a performance-based dependent variable. The leading text in the field of public organizations, Hal G. Rainey's Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (1996, 140), calls the article "particularly important [for] new insights and direction for research and thought on effectiveness of government services. . . ." The conclusions, which were based on a four-city study, were that the most effective community mental health network was not flexible or adaptive. The most effective network was controlled by a monopoly provider that dominated both service provision and the terms under which mental health services and funding were provided by other agencies. Most notably, this nonprofit agency had veto power over government contracts with other providers regarding services for mental illness.

AB - The authors of this article have developed a preliminary theory of network effectiveness wherein the unit of analysis is not the organization but the ties between the parts of a network of organizations that jointly produce a service (Provan and Milward 1995). This theory and the study that produced it differ from most studies of interorganizational relations and networks in that it has a performance-based dependent variable. The leading text in the field of public organizations, Hal G. Rainey's Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (1996, 140), calls the article "particularly important [for] new insights and direction for research and thought on effectiveness of government services. . . ." The conclusions, which were based on a four-city study, were that the most effective community mental health network was not flexible or adaptive. The most effective network was controlled by a monopoly provider that dominated both service provision and the terms under which mental health services and funding were provided by other agencies. Most notably, this nonprofit agency had veto power over government contracts with other providers regarding services for mental illness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007476408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007476408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0007476408

VL - 8

SP - 203

EP - 221

JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

SN - 1053-1858

IS - 2

ER -