Problems with the assessment of dietary fat in prostate cancer studies

Leslie K Dennis, Linda G. Snetselaar, Brian J. Smith, Ron E. Stewart, Michael E C Robbins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors conducted a detailed review of studies on the association between prostate cancer and total dietary fat along with specific fatty acids. Overall, the 29 studies reporting actual dietary fat levels in grams of fat were heterogeneous, suggesting that pooling of the relative risks may be inappropriate. Heterogeneity was also seen by study design. More specifically, although the pooled estimate for prostate cancer and an increase of 45 g in total fat consumption per day was small (relative risk = 1.2), heterogeneity between studies was large, and the association was not supported by specific fatty acids. The strongest association was found among the five extremely inconsistent studies of alpha-linolenic fatty acid. The associations with advanced prostate cancer were more homogeneous and suggest a relation with total and saturated fat but none with specific fatty acids. This review highlights the inconsistent way in which total dietary fat and specific fatty acids have been measured and reported across epidemiologic studies of prostate cancer. The heterogeneity between studies was large, possibly because of the variation in the dietary instruments used and the corresponding databases (nondifferential misclassification), recall bias, differing case definitions, residual confounding, or potential selection bias in different studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)436-444
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume160
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dietary Fats
Prostatic Neoplasms
Fatty Acids
Fats
alpha-Linolenic Acid
Selection Bias
Epidemiologic Studies
Databases

Keywords

  • Dietary fats
  • Meta-analysis
  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Review literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Dennis, L. K., Snetselaar, L. G., Smith, B. J., Stewart, R. E., & Robbins, M. E. C. (2004). Problems with the assessment of dietary fat in prostate cancer studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 160(5), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh243

Problems with the assessment of dietary fat in prostate cancer studies. / Dennis, Leslie K; Snetselaar, Linda G.; Smith, Brian J.; Stewart, Ron E.; Robbins, Michael E C.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 160, No. 5, 01.09.2004, p. 436-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dennis, LK, Snetselaar, LG, Smith, BJ, Stewart, RE & Robbins, MEC 2004, 'Problems with the assessment of dietary fat in prostate cancer studies', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 160, no. 5, pp. 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh243
Dennis, Leslie K ; Snetselaar, Linda G. ; Smith, Brian J. ; Stewart, Ron E. ; Robbins, Michael E C. / Problems with the assessment of dietary fat in prostate cancer studies. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2004 ; Vol. 160, No. 5. pp. 436-444.
@article{60f438c1bfdc46f29fbdd2624cead9b4,
title = "Problems with the assessment of dietary fat in prostate cancer studies",
abstract = "The authors conducted a detailed review of studies on the association between prostate cancer and total dietary fat along with specific fatty acids. Overall, the 29 studies reporting actual dietary fat levels in grams of fat were heterogeneous, suggesting that pooling of the relative risks may be inappropriate. Heterogeneity was also seen by study design. More specifically, although the pooled estimate for prostate cancer and an increase of 45 g in total fat consumption per day was small (relative risk = 1.2), heterogeneity between studies was large, and the association was not supported by specific fatty acids. The strongest association was found among the five extremely inconsistent studies of alpha-linolenic fatty acid. The associations with advanced prostate cancer were more homogeneous and suggest a relation with total and saturated fat but none with specific fatty acids. This review highlights the inconsistent way in which total dietary fat and specific fatty acids have been measured and reported across epidemiologic studies of prostate cancer. The heterogeneity between studies was large, possibly because of the variation in the dietary instruments used and the corresponding databases (nondifferential misclassification), recall bias, differing case definitions, residual confounding, or potential selection bias in different studies.",
keywords = "Dietary fats, Meta-analysis, Prostatic neoplasms, Review literature",
author = "Dennis, {Leslie K} and Snetselaar, {Linda G.} and Smith, {Brian J.} and Stewart, {Ron E.} and Robbins, {Michael E C}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwh243",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "160",
pages = "436--444",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problems with the assessment of dietary fat in prostate cancer studies

AU - Dennis, Leslie K

AU - Snetselaar, Linda G.

AU - Smith, Brian J.

AU - Stewart, Ron E.

AU - Robbins, Michael E C

PY - 2004/9/1

Y1 - 2004/9/1

N2 - The authors conducted a detailed review of studies on the association between prostate cancer and total dietary fat along with specific fatty acids. Overall, the 29 studies reporting actual dietary fat levels in grams of fat were heterogeneous, suggesting that pooling of the relative risks may be inappropriate. Heterogeneity was also seen by study design. More specifically, although the pooled estimate for prostate cancer and an increase of 45 g in total fat consumption per day was small (relative risk = 1.2), heterogeneity between studies was large, and the association was not supported by specific fatty acids. The strongest association was found among the five extremely inconsistent studies of alpha-linolenic fatty acid. The associations with advanced prostate cancer were more homogeneous and suggest a relation with total and saturated fat but none with specific fatty acids. This review highlights the inconsistent way in which total dietary fat and specific fatty acids have been measured and reported across epidemiologic studies of prostate cancer. The heterogeneity between studies was large, possibly because of the variation in the dietary instruments used and the corresponding databases (nondifferential misclassification), recall bias, differing case definitions, residual confounding, or potential selection bias in different studies.

AB - The authors conducted a detailed review of studies on the association between prostate cancer and total dietary fat along with specific fatty acids. Overall, the 29 studies reporting actual dietary fat levels in grams of fat were heterogeneous, suggesting that pooling of the relative risks may be inappropriate. Heterogeneity was also seen by study design. More specifically, although the pooled estimate for prostate cancer and an increase of 45 g in total fat consumption per day was small (relative risk = 1.2), heterogeneity between studies was large, and the association was not supported by specific fatty acids. The strongest association was found among the five extremely inconsistent studies of alpha-linolenic fatty acid. The associations with advanced prostate cancer were more homogeneous and suggest a relation with total and saturated fat but none with specific fatty acids. This review highlights the inconsistent way in which total dietary fat and specific fatty acids have been measured and reported across epidemiologic studies of prostate cancer. The heterogeneity between studies was large, possibly because of the variation in the dietary instruments used and the corresponding databases (nondifferential misclassification), recall bias, differing case definitions, residual confounding, or potential selection bias in different studies.

KW - Dietary fats

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

KW - Review literature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4444263339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4444263339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwh243

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwh243

M3 - Article

VL - 160

SP - 436

EP - 444

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 5

ER -