Procedural Fairness, Outcome Favorability, and Judgments of an Authority's Responsibility

Joel Brockner, Ariel Y. Fishman, Jochen Reb, Barry M Goldman, Scott Spiegel, Charlee Garden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fairness theory (R. Folger & R. Cropanzano, 1998, 2001) postulates that, particularly in the face of unfavorable outcomes, employees judge an organizational authority to be more responsible for their outcomes when the authority exhibits lower procedural fairness. Three studies lent empirical support to this notion. Furthermore, 2 of the studies showed that attributions of responsibility to the authority mediated the relationship between the authority's procedural fairness and employees' reactions to unfavorable outcomes. The findings (a) provide support for a key assumption of fairness theory, (b) help to account for the pervasive interactive effect of procedural fairness and outcome favorability on employees' attitudes and behaviors, and (c) contribute to an emerging trend in justice research concerned with how people use procedural fairness information to make attributions of responsibility for their outcomes. Practical implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research also are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1657-1671
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume92
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Social Justice
Research

Keywords

  • Fairness Theory
  • judgments of responsibility
  • procedural fairness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Procedural Fairness, Outcome Favorability, and Judgments of an Authority's Responsibility. / Brockner, Joel; Fishman, Ariel Y.; Reb, Jochen; Goldman, Barry M; Spiegel, Scott; Garden, Charlee.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 1657-1671.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brockner, Joel ; Fishman, Ariel Y. ; Reb, Jochen ; Goldman, Barry M ; Spiegel, Scott ; Garden, Charlee. / Procedural Fairness, Outcome Favorability, and Judgments of an Authority's Responsibility. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007 ; Vol. 92, No. 6. pp. 1657-1671.
@article{dfd803916e674b7c9be9300224046bea,
title = "Procedural Fairness, Outcome Favorability, and Judgments of an Authority's Responsibility",
abstract = "Fairness theory (R. Folger & R. Cropanzano, 1998, 2001) postulates that, particularly in the face of unfavorable outcomes, employees judge an organizational authority to be more responsible for their outcomes when the authority exhibits lower procedural fairness. Three studies lent empirical support to this notion. Furthermore, 2 of the studies showed that attributions of responsibility to the authority mediated the relationship between the authority's procedural fairness and employees' reactions to unfavorable outcomes. The findings (a) provide support for a key assumption of fairness theory, (b) help to account for the pervasive interactive effect of procedural fairness and outcome favorability on employees' attitudes and behaviors, and (c) contribute to an emerging trend in justice research concerned with how people use procedural fairness information to make attributions of responsibility for their outcomes. Practical implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research also are discussed.",
keywords = "Fairness Theory, judgments of responsibility, procedural fairness",
author = "Joel Brockner and Fishman, {Ariel Y.} and Jochen Reb and Goldman, {Barry M} and Scott Spiegel and Charlee Garden",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1657",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "1657--1671",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procedural Fairness, Outcome Favorability, and Judgments of an Authority's Responsibility

AU - Brockner, Joel

AU - Fishman, Ariel Y.

AU - Reb, Jochen

AU - Goldman, Barry M

AU - Spiegel, Scott

AU - Garden, Charlee

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Fairness theory (R. Folger & R. Cropanzano, 1998, 2001) postulates that, particularly in the face of unfavorable outcomes, employees judge an organizational authority to be more responsible for their outcomes when the authority exhibits lower procedural fairness. Three studies lent empirical support to this notion. Furthermore, 2 of the studies showed that attributions of responsibility to the authority mediated the relationship between the authority's procedural fairness and employees' reactions to unfavorable outcomes. The findings (a) provide support for a key assumption of fairness theory, (b) help to account for the pervasive interactive effect of procedural fairness and outcome favorability on employees' attitudes and behaviors, and (c) contribute to an emerging trend in justice research concerned with how people use procedural fairness information to make attributions of responsibility for their outcomes. Practical implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research also are discussed.

AB - Fairness theory (R. Folger & R. Cropanzano, 1998, 2001) postulates that, particularly in the face of unfavorable outcomes, employees judge an organizational authority to be more responsible for their outcomes when the authority exhibits lower procedural fairness. Three studies lent empirical support to this notion. Furthermore, 2 of the studies showed that attributions of responsibility to the authority mediated the relationship between the authority's procedural fairness and employees' reactions to unfavorable outcomes. The findings (a) provide support for a key assumption of fairness theory, (b) help to account for the pervasive interactive effect of procedural fairness and outcome favorability on employees' attitudes and behaviors, and (c) contribute to an emerging trend in justice research concerned with how people use procedural fairness information to make attributions of responsibility for their outcomes. Practical implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research also are discussed.

KW - Fairness Theory

KW - judgments of responsibility

KW - procedural fairness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36349016708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36349016708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1657

DO - 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1657

M3 - Article

C2 - 18020803

AN - SCOPUS:36349016708

VL - 92

SP - 1657

EP - 1671

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 6

ER -