Processes of native nationhood: The indigenous politics of self-government

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the last three decades, Indigenous peoples in the CANZUS countries (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States) have been reclaiming self-government as an Indigenous right and practice. In the process, they have been asserting various forms of Indigenous nationhood. This article argues that this development involves a common set of activities on the part of Indigenous peoples: (1) identifying as a nation or a people (determining who the appropriate collective "self " is in self-determination and self-government); (2) organizing as a political body (not just as a corporate holder of assets); and (3) acting on behalf of Indigenous goals (asserting and exercising practical decision-making power and responsibility, even in cases where central governments deny recognition). The article compares these activities in the four countries and argues that, while contexts and circumstances differ, the Indigenous politics of self-government show striking commonalities across the four. Among those commonalities: it is a positional as opposed to a distributional politics; while not ignoring individual welfare, it measures success in terms of collective power; and it focuses less on what central governments are willing to do in the way of recognition and rights than on what Indigenous nations or communities can do for themselves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4
JournalInternational Indigenous Policy Journal
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

politics
self-determination
New Zealand
assets
welfare
Canada
decision making
responsibility
community

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Canada
  • Indigenous rights
  • Nationhood
  • New Zealand
  • Self-determination
  • Self-governance
  • United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Cultural Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Processes of native nationhood : The indigenous politics of self-government. / Cornell, Stephen E.

In: International Indigenous Policy Journal, Vol. 6, No. 4, 4, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fde0450d864249c5bbc840a1d0775655,
title = "Processes of native nationhood: The indigenous politics of self-government",
abstract = "Over the last three decades, Indigenous peoples in the CANZUS countries (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States) have been reclaiming self-government as an Indigenous right and practice. In the process, they have been asserting various forms of Indigenous nationhood. This article argues that this development involves a common set of activities on the part of Indigenous peoples: (1) identifying as a nation or a people (determining who the appropriate collective {"}self {"} is in self-determination and self-government); (2) organizing as a political body (not just as a corporate holder of assets); and (3) acting on behalf of Indigenous goals (asserting and exercising practical decision-making power and responsibility, even in cases where central governments deny recognition). The article compares these activities in the four countries and argues that, while contexts and circumstances differ, the Indigenous politics of self-government show striking commonalities across the four. Among those commonalities: it is a positional as opposed to a distributional politics; while not ignoring individual welfare, it measures success in terms of collective power; and it focuses less on what central governments are willing to do in the way of recognition and rights than on what Indigenous nations or communities can do for themselves.",
keywords = "Australia, Canada, Indigenous rights, Nationhood, New Zealand, Self-determination, Self-governance, United States",
author = "Cornell, {Stephen E}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18584/iipj.2015.6.4.4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "International Indigenous Policy Journal",
issn = "1916-5781",
publisher = "Western University",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processes of native nationhood

T2 - The indigenous politics of self-government

AU - Cornell, Stephen E

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Over the last three decades, Indigenous peoples in the CANZUS countries (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States) have been reclaiming self-government as an Indigenous right and practice. In the process, they have been asserting various forms of Indigenous nationhood. This article argues that this development involves a common set of activities on the part of Indigenous peoples: (1) identifying as a nation or a people (determining who the appropriate collective "self " is in self-determination and self-government); (2) organizing as a political body (not just as a corporate holder of assets); and (3) acting on behalf of Indigenous goals (asserting and exercising practical decision-making power and responsibility, even in cases where central governments deny recognition). The article compares these activities in the four countries and argues that, while contexts and circumstances differ, the Indigenous politics of self-government show striking commonalities across the four. Among those commonalities: it is a positional as opposed to a distributional politics; while not ignoring individual welfare, it measures success in terms of collective power; and it focuses less on what central governments are willing to do in the way of recognition and rights than on what Indigenous nations or communities can do for themselves.

AB - Over the last three decades, Indigenous peoples in the CANZUS countries (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States) have been reclaiming self-government as an Indigenous right and practice. In the process, they have been asserting various forms of Indigenous nationhood. This article argues that this development involves a common set of activities on the part of Indigenous peoples: (1) identifying as a nation or a people (determining who the appropriate collective "self " is in self-determination and self-government); (2) organizing as a political body (not just as a corporate holder of assets); and (3) acting on behalf of Indigenous goals (asserting and exercising practical decision-making power and responsibility, even in cases where central governments deny recognition). The article compares these activities in the four countries and argues that, while contexts and circumstances differ, the Indigenous politics of self-government show striking commonalities across the four. Among those commonalities: it is a positional as opposed to a distributional politics; while not ignoring individual welfare, it measures success in terms of collective power; and it focuses less on what central governments are willing to do in the way of recognition and rights than on what Indigenous nations or communities can do for themselves.

KW - Australia

KW - Canada

KW - Indigenous rights

KW - Nationhood

KW - New Zealand

KW - Self-determination

KW - Self-governance

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018070801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018070801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18584/iipj.2015.6.4.4

DO - 10.18584/iipj.2015.6.4.4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018070801

VL - 6

JO - International Indigenous Policy Journal

JF - International Indigenous Policy Journal

SN - 1916-5781

IS - 4

M1 - 4

ER -