Product quality in organic and conventional produce: Is there a difference?

Neilson C. Conklin, Gary D Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Economists studying markets for organic produce and proponents of organic agriculture have often assumed that organic produce has more defects than conventional produce and that consumers buying organics are exchanging visual quality for perceived food safety and environmental benefits. Analysis of primary retail‐level data on quality for eight organic and conventional produce items found no statistically significant difference in quality for most products. The results provide evidence that the assumption that organic produce is necessarily of inferior visual quality is unwarranted. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-307
Number of pages13
JournalAgribusiness
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Product quality in organic and conventional produce: Is there a difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this