Professional education and assessment practices in central auditory processing.

G. D. Chermak, W. A. Traynham, J. A. Seikel, Frank Musiek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A 17-item questionnaire probing professional preparation and current practices in central auditory assessment was mailed to 500 audiologists selected randomly from the membership directory of the American Academy of Audiology. Data from 183 respondents, representing a 37 percent response rate, were analyzed. The majority of respondents reported minimal academic and clinical preparation in assessment of the central auditory nervous system. Eighty percent of respondents had not taken any graduate course explicitly dedicated to central auditory processing. However, 80 percent had taken at least one basic science course in central audition and 83 percent reported having taken at least one graduate course that included some coverage of central auditory processing and/or the central auditory nervous system. A mean of 3 clinical clock hours accrued in this area was reported. Not surprisingly, 78 percent reported a satisfaction rating of < or =50 percent relative to the graduate education they received in this area and only 41 percent reported providing central auditory assessment. Comparisons with prior surveys show substantial change in the preferred test battery. Most notable is the pivotal role of physiologic measures, with the acoustic reflex and auditory brainstem response listed along with the SCAN as the three most frequently used assessment tests/procedures. Overall, the results suggest a need for improvement in professional preparation in evaluation of central auditory function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)452-465
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
Volume9
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Professional Education
Central Nervous System
Acoustic Reflex
Graduate Education
Audiology
Directories
Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Hearing
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Professional education and assessment practices in central auditory processing. / Chermak, G. D.; Traynham, W. A.; Seikel, J. A.; Musiek, Frank.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol. 9, No. 6, 12.1998, p. 452-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chermak, G. D. ; Traynham, W. A. ; Seikel, J. A. ; Musiek, Frank. / Professional education and assessment practices in central auditory processing. In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 1998 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 452-465.
@article{9ed2e45a3aff4ca3b6bf7bc8a7bcba10,
title = "Professional education and assessment practices in central auditory processing.",
abstract = "A 17-item questionnaire probing professional preparation and current practices in central auditory assessment was mailed to 500 audiologists selected randomly from the membership directory of the American Academy of Audiology. Data from 183 respondents, representing a 37 percent response rate, were analyzed. The majority of respondents reported minimal academic and clinical preparation in assessment of the central auditory nervous system. Eighty percent of respondents had not taken any graduate course explicitly dedicated to central auditory processing. However, 80 percent had taken at least one basic science course in central audition and 83 percent reported having taken at least one graduate course that included some coverage of central auditory processing and/or the central auditory nervous system. A mean of 3 clinical clock hours accrued in this area was reported. Not surprisingly, 78 percent reported a satisfaction rating of < or =50 percent relative to the graduate education they received in this area and only 41 percent reported providing central auditory assessment. Comparisons with prior surveys show substantial change in the preferred test battery. Most notable is the pivotal role of physiologic measures, with the acoustic reflex and auditory brainstem response listed along with the SCAN as the three most frequently used assessment tests/procedures. Overall, the results suggest a need for improvement in professional preparation in evaluation of central auditory function.",
author = "Chermak, {G. D.} and Traynham, {W. A.} and Seikel, {J. A.} and Frank Musiek",
year = "1998",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "452--465",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Audiology",
issn = "1050-0545",
publisher = "American Academy of Audiology",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional education and assessment practices in central auditory processing.

AU - Chermak, G. D.

AU - Traynham, W. A.

AU - Seikel, J. A.

AU - Musiek, Frank

PY - 1998/12

Y1 - 1998/12

N2 - A 17-item questionnaire probing professional preparation and current practices in central auditory assessment was mailed to 500 audiologists selected randomly from the membership directory of the American Academy of Audiology. Data from 183 respondents, representing a 37 percent response rate, were analyzed. The majority of respondents reported minimal academic and clinical preparation in assessment of the central auditory nervous system. Eighty percent of respondents had not taken any graduate course explicitly dedicated to central auditory processing. However, 80 percent had taken at least one basic science course in central audition and 83 percent reported having taken at least one graduate course that included some coverage of central auditory processing and/or the central auditory nervous system. A mean of 3 clinical clock hours accrued in this area was reported. Not surprisingly, 78 percent reported a satisfaction rating of < or =50 percent relative to the graduate education they received in this area and only 41 percent reported providing central auditory assessment. Comparisons with prior surveys show substantial change in the preferred test battery. Most notable is the pivotal role of physiologic measures, with the acoustic reflex and auditory brainstem response listed along with the SCAN as the three most frequently used assessment tests/procedures. Overall, the results suggest a need for improvement in professional preparation in evaluation of central auditory function.

AB - A 17-item questionnaire probing professional preparation and current practices in central auditory assessment was mailed to 500 audiologists selected randomly from the membership directory of the American Academy of Audiology. Data from 183 respondents, representing a 37 percent response rate, were analyzed. The majority of respondents reported minimal academic and clinical preparation in assessment of the central auditory nervous system. Eighty percent of respondents had not taken any graduate course explicitly dedicated to central auditory processing. However, 80 percent had taken at least one basic science course in central audition and 83 percent reported having taken at least one graduate course that included some coverage of central auditory processing and/or the central auditory nervous system. A mean of 3 clinical clock hours accrued in this area was reported. Not surprisingly, 78 percent reported a satisfaction rating of < or =50 percent relative to the graduate education they received in this area and only 41 percent reported providing central auditory assessment. Comparisons with prior surveys show substantial change in the preferred test battery. Most notable is the pivotal role of physiologic measures, with the acoustic reflex and auditory brainstem response listed along with the SCAN as the three most frequently used assessment tests/procedures. Overall, the results suggest a need for improvement in professional preparation in evaluation of central auditory function.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032238632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032238632&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9865778

AN - SCOPUS:0032238632

VL - 9

SP - 452

EP - 465

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

SN - 1050-0545

IS - 6

ER -