Progressive radiation dose reduction from coronary computed tomography angiography in a statewide collaborative quality improvement program: Results from the advanced cardiovascular imaging consortium

Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan, Judith A. Boura, Ann DePetris, Ralph Gentry, Aiden Abidov, David A. Share, Gilbert L. Raff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background-A best-practice intervention previously demonstrated significant dose reduction over a period of one year. We sought to evaluate whether this reduction would be incremental and sustained by promoting new scanner technology in the context of an ongoing quality improvement program during a 3-year period in a statewide registry of coronary computed tomography angiography. Methods and Results-In this prospective, controlled, nonrandomized study involving 11 901 patients at 15 Michigan centers participating in the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium, radiation doses and image quality were compared between the following periods: control (May to June 2008) versus follow-up I (July 2008 to June 2009) and follow-up I versus follow-up II (July 2009 to April 2011). Intervention during these study periods included continuous education, feedback, and mandatory participation in this initiative. The median radiation dose remained unchanged from control to follow-up I: dose-length product of 697 (interquartile range, 407-1163) to 675 (interquartile range, 418-1146) mGy·cm (P=0.93). With the introduction of newer technology in follow-up I period, there was incremental 31% decrease during follow-up II to median dose-length product of 468 (interquartile range, 292-811) mGy·cm (P<0.0001). No significant change was noted in the percentage of diagnostic quality scans from follow-up I (92%) to follow-up II (92.7%). Conclusions-Although ongoing application of a best-practice algorithm was associated with sustaining previously achieved targets, the use of newer scanner technology resulted in incremental radiation dose reduction in a statewide coronary computed tomography angiography registry without image quality degradation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)646-654
Number of pages9
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Radiation
Technology
Practice Guidelines
Registries
Education
Computed Tomography Angiography

Keywords

  • Coronary angiography
  • Follow-up studies
  • Multidetector computed tomography
  • Radiation dosage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Progressive radiation dose reduction from coronary computed tomography angiography in a statewide collaborative quality improvement program : Results from the advanced cardiovascular imaging consortium. / Chinnaiyan, Kavitha M.; Boura, Judith A.; DePetris, Ann; Gentry, Ralph; Abidov, Aiden; Share, David A.; Raff, Gilbert L.

In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, Vol. 6, No. 5, 09.2013, p. 646-654.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1216e15fb20f4f1a813076bf40e40d10,
title = "Progressive radiation dose reduction from coronary computed tomography angiography in a statewide collaborative quality improvement program: Results from the advanced cardiovascular imaging consortium",
abstract = "Background-A best-practice intervention previously demonstrated significant dose reduction over a period of one year. We sought to evaluate whether this reduction would be incremental and sustained by promoting new scanner technology in the context of an ongoing quality improvement program during a 3-year period in a statewide registry of coronary computed tomography angiography. Methods and Results-In this prospective, controlled, nonrandomized study involving 11 901 patients at 15 Michigan centers participating in the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium, radiation doses and image quality were compared between the following periods: control (May to June 2008) versus follow-up I (July 2008 to June 2009) and follow-up I versus follow-up II (July 2009 to April 2011). Intervention during these study periods included continuous education, feedback, and mandatory participation in this initiative. The median radiation dose remained unchanged from control to follow-up I: dose-length product of 697 (interquartile range, 407-1163) to 675 (interquartile range, 418-1146) mGy·cm (P=0.93). With the introduction of newer technology in follow-up I period, there was incremental 31{\%} decrease during follow-up II to median dose-length product of 468 (interquartile range, 292-811) mGy·cm (P<0.0001). No significant change was noted in the percentage of diagnostic quality scans from follow-up I (92{\%}) to follow-up II (92.7{\%}). Conclusions-Although ongoing application of a best-practice algorithm was associated with sustaining previously achieved targets, the use of newer scanner technology resulted in incremental radiation dose reduction in a statewide coronary computed tomography angiography registry without image quality degradation.",
keywords = "Coronary angiography, Follow-up studies, Multidetector computed tomography, Radiation dosage",
author = "Chinnaiyan, {Kavitha M.} and Boura, {Judith A.} and Ann DePetris and Ralph Gentry and Aiden Abidov and Share, {David A.} and Raff, {Gilbert L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000237",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "646--654",
journal = "Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging",
issn = "1941-9651",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Progressive radiation dose reduction from coronary computed tomography angiography in a statewide collaborative quality improvement program

T2 - Results from the advanced cardiovascular imaging consortium

AU - Chinnaiyan, Kavitha M.

AU - Boura, Judith A.

AU - DePetris, Ann

AU - Gentry, Ralph

AU - Abidov, Aiden

AU - Share, David A.

AU - Raff, Gilbert L.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Background-A best-practice intervention previously demonstrated significant dose reduction over a period of one year. We sought to evaluate whether this reduction would be incremental and sustained by promoting new scanner technology in the context of an ongoing quality improvement program during a 3-year period in a statewide registry of coronary computed tomography angiography. Methods and Results-In this prospective, controlled, nonrandomized study involving 11 901 patients at 15 Michigan centers participating in the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium, radiation doses and image quality were compared between the following periods: control (May to June 2008) versus follow-up I (July 2008 to June 2009) and follow-up I versus follow-up II (July 2009 to April 2011). Intervention during these study periods included continuous education, feedback, and mandatory participation in this initiative. The median radiation dose remained unchanged from control to follow-up I: dose-length product of 697 (interquartile range, 407-1163) to 675 (interquartile range, 418-1146) mGy·cm (P=0.93). With the introduction of newer technology in follow-up I period, there was incremental 31% decrease during follow-up II to median dose-length product of 468 (interquartile range, 292-811) mGy·cm (P<0.0001). No significant change was noted in the percentage of diagnostic quality scans from follow-up I (92%) to follow-up II (92.7%). Conclusions-Although ongoing application of a best-practice algorithm was associated with sustaining previously achieved targets, the use of newer scanner technology resulted in incremental radiation dose reduction in a statewide coronary computed tomography angiography registry without image quality degradation.

AB - Background-A best-practice intervention previously demonstrated significant dose reduction over a period of one year. We sought to evaluate whether this reduction would be incremental and sustained by promoting new scanner technology in the context of an ongoing quality improvement program during a 3-year period in a statewide registry of coronary computed tomography angiography. Methods and Results-In this prospective, controlled, nonrandomized study involving 11 901 patients at 15 Michigan centers participating in the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium, radiation doses and image quality were compared between the following periods: control (May to June 2008) versus follow-up I (July 2008 to June 2009) and follow-up I versus follow-up II (July 2009 to April 2011). Intervention during these study periods included continuous education, feedback, and mandatory participation in this initiative. The median radiation dose remained unchanged from control to follow-up I: dose-length product of 697 (interquartile range, 407-1163) to 675 (interquartile range, 418-1146) mGy·cm (P=0.93). With the introduction of newer technology in follow-up I period, there was incremental 31% decrease during follow-up II to median dose-length product of 468 (interquartile range, 292-811) mGy·cm (P<0.0001). No significant change was noted in the percentage of diagnostic quality scans from follow-up I (92%) to follow-up II (92.7%). Conclusions-Although ongoing application of a best-practice algorithm was associated with sustaining previously achieved targets, the use of newer scanner technology resulted in incremental radiation dose reduction in a statewide coronary computed tomography angiography registry without image quality degradation.

KW - Coronary angiography

KW - Follow-up studies

KW - Multidetector computed tomography

KW - Radiation dosage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884483541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884483541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000237

DO - 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000237

M3 - Article

C2 - 23926193

AN - SCOPUS:84884483541

VL - 6

SP - 646

EP - 654

JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

SN - 1941-9651

IS - 5

ER -