Prominent but Less Productive: The Impact of Interdisciplinarity on Scientists’ Research

Erin E Leahey, Christine M. Beckman, Taryn L. Stanko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Federal agencies and universities in the U.S. promote interdisciplinary research because it presumably spurs transformative, innovative science. Using data on almost 900 research-center–based scientists and their 32,000 published articles, along with a set of unpublished papers, we assess whether such research is indeed beneficial and whether costs accompany the potential benefits. Existing research highlights this tension: whereas the innovation literature suggests that spanning disciplines is beneficial because it allows scientists to see connections across fields, the categories literature suggests that spanning disciplines is penalized because the resulting research may be lower quality or confusing to place. To investigate this, we empirically distinguish production and reception effects and highlight a new production penalty: lower productivity, which may be attributable to cognitive and collaborative challenges associated with interdisciplinary research and/or hurdles in the review process. Using an innovative measure of interdisciplinary research that considers the similarity of the disciplines spanned, we document both penalties (fewer papers published) and benefits (increased citations) associated with it and show that it is a high-risk, high-reward endeavor, one that partly depends on field-level interdisciplinarity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-139
Number of pages35
JournalAdministrative Science Quarterly
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

interdisciplinarity
interdisciplinary research
penalty
reward
productivity
innovation
Interdisciplinarity
Interdisciplinary Research
university
costs
science
literature

Keywords

  • creativity
  • interdisciplinary research
  • organizational ecology
  • organizational innovation
  • scientific careers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Prominent but Less Productive : The Impact of Interdisciplinarity on Scientists’ Research. / Leahey, Erin E; Beckman, Christine M.; Stanko, Taryn L.

In: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2017, p. 105-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{645d15e8a2aa4a10a5d537284a07013b,
title = "Prominent but Less Productive: The Impact of Interdisciplinarity on Scientists’ Research",
abstract = "Federal agencies and universities in the U.S. promote interdisciplinary research because it presumably spurs transformative, innovative science. Using data on almost 900 research-center–based scientists and their 32,000 published articles, along with a set of unpublished papers, we assess whether such research is indeed beneficial and whether costs accompany the potential benefits. Existing research highlights this tension: whereas the innovation literature suggests that spanning disciplines is beneficial because it allows scientists to see connections across fields, the categories literature suggests that spanning disciplines is penalized because the resulting research may be lower quality or confusing to place. To investigate this, we empirically distinguish production and reception effects and highlight a new production penalty: lower productivity, which may be attributable to cognitive and collaborative challenges associated with interdisciplinary research and/or hurdles in the review process. Using an innovative measure of interdisciplinary research that considers the similarity of the disciplines spanned, we document both penalties (fewer papers published) and benefits (increased citations) associated with it and show that it is a high-risk, high-reward endeavor, one that partly depends on field-level interdisciplinarity.",
keywords = "creativity, interdisciplinary research, organizational ecology, organizational innovation, scientific careers",
author = "Leahey, {Erin E} and Beckman, {Christine M.} and Stanko, {Taryn L.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0001839216665364",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "105--139",
journal = "Administrative Science Quarterly",
issn = "0001-8392",
publisher = "Johnson School at Cornell University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prominent but Less Productive

T2 - The Impact of Interdisciplinarity on Scientists’ Research

AU - Leahey, Erin E

AU - Beckman, Christine M.

AU - Stanko, Taryn L.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Federal agencies and universities in the U.S. promote interdisciplinary research because it presumably spurs transformative, innovative science. Using data on almost 900 research-center–based scientists and their 32,000 published articles, along with a set of unpublished papers, we assess whether such research is indeed beneficial and whether costs accompany the potential benefits. Existing research highlights this tension: whereas the innovation literature suggests that spanning disciplines is beneficial because it allows scientists to see connections across fields, the categories literature suggests that spanning disciplines is penalized because the resulting research may be lower quality or confusing to place. To investigate this, we empirically distinguish production and reception effects and highlight a new production penalty: lower productivity, which may be attributable to cognitive and collaborative challenges associated with interdisciplinary research and/or hurdles in the review process. Using an innovative measure of interdisciplinary research that considers the similarity of the disciplines spanned, we document both penalties (fewer papers published) and benefits (increased citations) associated with it and show that it is a high-risk, high-reward endeavor, one that partly depends on field-level interdisciplinarity.

AB - Federal agencies and universities in the U.S. promote interdisciplinary research because it presumably spurs transformative, innovative science. Using data on almost 900 research-center–based scientists and their 32,000 published articles, along with a set of unpublished papers, we assess whether such research is indeed beneficial and whether costs accompany the potential benefits. Existing research highlights this tension: whereas the innovation literature suggests that spanning disciplines is beneficial because it allows scientists to see connections across fields, the categories literature suggests that spanning disciplines is penalized because the resulting research may be lower quality or confusing to place. To investigate this, we empirically distinguish production and reception effects and highlight a new production penalty: lower productivity, which may be attributable to cognitive and collaborative challenges associated with interdisciplinary research and/or hurdles in the review process. Using an innovative measure of interdisciplinary research that considers the similarity of the disciplines spanned, we document both penalties (fewer papers published) and benefits (increased citations) associated with it and show that it is a high-risk, high-reward endeavor, one that partly depends on field-level interdisciplinarity.

KW - creativity

KW - interdisciplinary research

KW - organizational ecology

KW - organizational innovation

KW - scientific careers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011685051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011685051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0001839216665364

DO - 10.1177/0001839216665364

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011685051

VL - 62

SP - 105

EP - 139

JO - Administrative Science Quarterly

JF - Administrative Science Quarterly

SN - 0001-8392

IS - 1

ER -