Property

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article argues that political philosophers for the most part have not successfully come to terms with the implications of the modern concept of property. It shows that the fragmentation of property is real and is not easily overcome. It begins in Section 2 by reviewing the bundle-of-rights approach. Section 3 examines several attempts to identify a normative or logical structure to these rights that preserves the classic conception of ownership. Section 4 presents an alternative conception of a regime of strong property rights that should be attractive to classical liberals yet avoids an appeal to the classic idea of ownership, accepting both Grey's fragmentation and the "no things" theses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780199968886, 9780195376692
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 18 2012

Fingerprint

Ownership
Conception
Fragmentation
Bundle
Logic
Political philosophers
Reviewing
Property Rights

Keywords

  • Bundle-of-rights
  • Fragmentation of property
  • Ownership
  • Political philosophers
  • Property rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Gaus, G. F. (2012). Property. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0005

Property. / Gaus, Gerald F.

The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Gaus, GF 2012, Property. in The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0005
Gaus GF. Property. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0005
Gaus, Gerald F. / Property. The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{df70530eca00418984371aee38102f03,
title = "Property",
abstract = "This article argues that political philosophers for the most part have not successfully come to terms with the implications of the modern concept of property. It shows that the fragmentation of property is real and is not easily overcome. It begins in Section 2 by reviewing the bundle-of-rights approach. Section 3 examines several attempts to identify a normative or logical structure to these rights that preserves the classic conception of ownership. Section 4 presents an alternative conception of a regime of strong property rights that should be attractive to classical liberals yet avoids an appeal to the classic idea of ownership, accepting both Grey's fragmentation and the {"}no things{"} theses.",
keywords = "Bundle-of-rights, Fragmentation of property, Ownership, Political philosophers, Property rights",
author = "Gaus, {Gerald F}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199968886",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Property

AU - Gaus, Gerald F

PY - 2012/6/18

Y1 - 2012/6/18

N2 - This article argues that political philosophers for the most part have not successfully come to terms with the implications of the modern concept of property. It shows that the fragmentation of property is real and is not easily overcome. It begins in Section 2 by reviewing the bundle-of-rights approach. Section 3 examines several attempts to identify a normative or logical structure to these rights that preserves the classic conception of ownership. Section 4 presents an alternative conception of a regime of strong property rights that should be attractive to classical liberals yet avoids an appeal to the classic idea of ownership, accepting both Grey's fragmentation and the "no things" theses.

AB - This article argues that political philosophers for the most part have not successfully come to terms with the implications of the modern concept of property. It shows that the fragmentation of property is real and is not easily overcome. It begins in Section 2 by reviewing the bundle-of-rights approach. Section 3 examines several attempts to identify a normative or logical structure to these rights that preserves the classic conception of ownership. Section 4 presents an alternative conception of a regime of strong property rights that should be attractive to classical liberals yet avoids an appeal to the classic idea of ownership, accepting both Grey's fragmentation and the "no things" theses.

KW - Bundle-of-rights

KW - Fragmentation of property

KW - Ownership

KW - Political philosophers

KW - Property rights

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923268457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923268457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0005

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0005

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923268457

SN - 9780199968886

SN - 9780195376692

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -