Prophylactic antibiotic compliance with published guidelines

Brian L Erstad, Jill M. Schultz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the rate of compliance with National Surgical Infection Prevention Project performance measures and compliance with American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines for procedures not covered by these measures and to evaluate noncompliance for explanatory factors. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics for Class I (clean) or Class II (clean-contaminated) surgical procedures. Information collected included antibiotic ordered, antibiotic given, dose of antibiotic, time of administration, time of incision, time of closure, duration of procedure, need for re-dosing during the procedure, documentation of re-dosing administered, and antibiotic discontinuation. Results: Choice of antibiotic for prophylaxis was appropriate in 99% of the 568 procedures. Antibiotic was administered too early in 94 of 527 (17.8%) patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were inappropriately continued for more than 24 hours in 43 of 216 (20%) patients undergoing noncardiothoracic procedures and for more than 48 hours in 4 of 10 (40%) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Conclusion: Although improvements in key performance measures related to prophylactic antibiotic agent selection, timing of administration, and discontinuation have been made compared to data collected in a larger multicenter study conducted at the beginning of this century, there remains considerable room for improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)301-305
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pharmacy Practice
Volume19
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Documentation
Multicenter Studies
Infection

Keywords

  • Antibacterial agents
  • Antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology

Cite this

Prophylactic antibiotic compliance with published guidelines. / Erstad, Brian L; Schultz, Jill M.

In: Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 19, No. 5, 01.2006, p. 301-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8427485181c74a1ca9296b147648f3d4,
title = "Prophylactic antibiotic compliance with published guidelines",
abstract = "Purpose: To examine the rate of compliance with National Surgical Infection Prevention Project performance measures and compliance with American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines for procedures not covered by these measures and to evaluate noncompliance for explanatory factors. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics for Class I (clean) or Class II (clean-contaminated) surgical procedures. Information collected included antibiotic ordered, antibiotic given, dose of antibiotic, time of administration, time of incision, time of closure, duration of procedure, need for re-dosing during the procedure, documentation of re-dosing administered, and antibiotic discontinuation. Results: Choice of antibiotic for prophylaxis was appropriate in 99{\%} of the 568 procedures. Antibiotic was administered too early in 94 of 527 (17.8{\%}) patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were inappropriately continued for more than 24 hours in 43 of 216 (20{\%}) patients undergoing noncardiothoracic procedures and for more than 48 hours in 4 of 10 (40{\%}) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Conclusion: Although improvements in key performance measures related to prophylactic antibiotic agent selection, timing of administration, and discontinuation have been made compared to data collected in a larger multicenter study conducted at the beginning of this century, there remains considerable room for improvement.",
keywords = "Antibacterial agents, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Surgery",
author = "Erstad, {Brian L} and Schultz, {Jill M.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0897190007300459",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "301--305",
journal = "Journal of Pharmacy Practice",
issn = "0897-1900",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prophylactic antibiotic compliance with published guidelines

AU - Erstad, Brian L

AU - Schultz, Jill M.

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Purpose: To examine the rate of compliance with National Surgical Infection Prevention Project performance measures and compliance with American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines for procedures not covered by these measures and to evaluate noncompliance for explanatory factors. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics for Class I (clean) or Class II (clean-contaminated) surgical procedures. Information collected included antibiotic ordered, antibiotic given, dose of antibiotic, time of administration, time of incision, time of closure, duration of procedure, need for re-dosing during the procedure, documentation of re-dosing administered, and antibiotic discontinuation. Results: Choice of antibiotic for prophylaxis was appropriate in 99% of the 568 procedures. Antibiotic was administered too early in 94 of 527 (17.8%) patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were inappropriately continued for more than 24 hours in 43 of 216 (20%) patients undergoing noncardiothoracic procedures and for more than 48 hours in 4 of 10 (40%) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Conclusion: Although improvements in key performance measures related to prophylactic antibiotic agent selection, timing of administration, and discontinuation have been made compared to data collected in a larger multicenter study conducted at the beginning of this century, there remains considerable room for improvement.

AB - Purpose: To examine the rate of compliance with National Surgical Infection Prevention Project performance measures and compliance with American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines for procedures not covered by these measures and to evaluate noncompliance for explanatory factors. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics for Class I (clean) or Class II (clean-contaminated) surgical procedures. Information collected included antibiotic ordered, antibiotic given, dose of antibiotic, time of administration, time of incision, time of closure, duration of procedure, need for re-dosing during the procedure, documentation of re-dosing administered, and antibiotic discontinuation. Results: Choice of antibiotic for prophylaxis was appropriate in 99% of the 568 procedures. Antibiotic was administered too early in 94 of 527 (17.8%) patients. Prophylactic antibiotics were inappropriately continued for more than 24 hours in 43 of 216 (20%) patients undergoing noncardiothoracic procedures and for more than 48 hours in 4 of 10 (40%) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Conclusion: Although improvements in key performance measures related to prophylactic antibiotic agent selection, timing of administration, and discontinuation have been made compared to data collected in a larger multicenter study conducted at the beginning of this century, there remains considerable room for improvement.

KW - Antibacterial agents

KW - Antibiotic prophylaxis

KW - Surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248217956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34248217956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0897190007300459

DO - 10.1177/0897190007300459

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 301

EP - 305

JO - Journal of Pharmacy Practice

JF - Journal of Pharmacy Practice

SN - 0897-1900

IS - 5

ER -