Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest

Jennifer Suzanne Earl, Sarah A. Soule, John D. McCarthy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

178 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypotheses about police presence and police action at social movement protest events in New York State between 1968 and 1973 are tested with the aim of understanding the broad mechanisms of social control used by authorities during this cycle of mass protest. Contrary to the popular perception of overzealous police repression of protest in this period, results show that police did not attend the majority of protest events. Tests of dominant explanations of police presence using logistic regression analysis indicate that the best predictor of police presence at a protest event was how threatening the event was-police attended larger protest events and those that used confrontational tactics. Tests (using multinomial logistic regression) of explanations of police action, given police presence at an event, indicate that extreme forms of police action were also triggered by threatening characteristics of events. Events in which subordinate groups and social movement organizations participated were also more likely to draw police action. Novel contributions include the comparison of dominant explanations of protest policing and methods that move beyond the tradition of examining repression through police presence or absence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)581-606
Number of pages26
JournalAmerican Sociological Review
Volume68
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

protest
police
event
repression
social movement
logistics
social control
tactics
regression analysis
regression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Earl, J. S., Soule, S. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2003). Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest. American Sociological Review, 68(4), 581-606.

Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest. / Earl, Jennifer Suzanne; Soule, Sarah A.; McCarthy, John D.

In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 68, No. 4, 08.2003, p. 581-606.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Earl, JS, Soule, SA & McCarthy, JD 2003, 'Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest', American Sociological Review, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 581-606.
Earl, Jennifer Suzanne ; Soule, Sarah A. ; McCarthy, John D. / Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest. In: American Sociological Review. 2003 ; Vol. 68, No. 4. pp. 581-606.
@article{fe12e9e56b4541378fd4572f7a8416ba,
title = "Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest",
abstract = "Hypotheses about police presence and police action at social movement protest events in New York State between 1968 and 1973 are tested with the aim of understanding the broad mechanisms of social control used by authorities during this cycle of mass protest. Contrary to the popular perception of overzealous police repression of protest in this period, results show that police did not attend the majority of protest events. Tests of dominant explanations of police presence using logistic regression analysis indicate that the best predictor of police presence at a protest event was how threatening the event was-police attended larger protest events and those that used confrontational tactics. Tests (using multinomial logistic regression) of explanations of police action, given police presence at an event, indicate that extreme forms of police action were also triggered by threatening characteristics of events. Events in which subordinate groups and social movement organizations participated were also more likely to draw police action. Novel contributions include the comparison of dominant explanations of protest policing and methods that move beyond the tradition of examining repression through police presence or absence.",
author = "Earl, {Jennifer Suzanne} and Soule, {Sarah A.} and McCarthy, {John D.}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "581--606",
journal = "American Sociological Review",
issn = "0003-1224",
publisher = "American Sociological Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest

AU - Earl, Jennifer Suzanne

AU - Soule, Sarah A.

AU - McCarthy, John D.

PY - 2003/8

Y1 - 2003/8

N2 - Hypotheses about police presence and police action at social movement protest events in New York State between 1968 and 1973 are tested with the aim of understanding the broad mechanisms of social control used by authorities during this cycle of mass protest. Contrary to the popular perception of overzealous police repression of protest in this period, results show that police did not attend the majority of protest events. Tests of dominant explanations of police presence using logistic regression analysis indicate that the best predictor of police presence at a protest event was how threatening the event was-police attended larger protest events and those that used confrontational tactics. Tests (using multinomial logistic regression) of explanations of police action, given police presence at an event, indicate that extreme forms of police action were also triggered by threatening characteristics of events. Events in which subordinate groups and social movement organizations participated were also more likely to draw police action. Novel contributions include the comparison of dominant explanations of protest policing and methods that move beyond the tradition of examining repression through police presence or absence.

AB - Hypotheses about police presence and police action at social movement protest events in New York State between 1968 and 1973 are tested with the aim of understanding the broad mechanisms of social control used by authorities during this cycle of mass protest. Contrary to the popular perception of overzealous police repression of protest in this period, results show that police did not attend the majority of protest events. Tests of dominant explanations of police presence using logistic regression analysis indicate that the best predictor of police presence at a protest event was how threatening the event was-police attended larger protest events and those that used confrontational tactics. Tests (using multinomial logistic regression) of explanations of police action, given police presence at an event, indicate that extreme forms of police action were also triggered by threatening characteristics of events. Events in which subordinate groups and social movement organizations participated were also more likely to draw police action. Novel contributions include the comparison of dominant explanations of protest policing and methods that move beyond the tradition of examining repression through police presence or absence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242286546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242286546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0242286546

VL - 68

SP - 581

EP - 606

JO - American Sociological Review

JF - American Sociological Review

SN - 0003-1224

IS - 4

ER -