Psychological Motives and Political Orientation - The Left, the Right, and the Rigid

Comment on Jost et al. (2003)

Jeff L Greenberg, Eva Jonas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

167 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Presenting an impressive model based on a large body of evidence, J. T. Jost, J. Glaser, A.W. Kruglanski, and F. J. Sulloway (2003) proposed that political conservatism uniquely serves epistemic, existential, and ideological needs driven by fears and uncertainties. The authors offer an alternative view based on conceptual considerations, historical events, features of communist ideology and practice, and additional social science research not reviewed by Jost et al. (2003). First, the authors take issue with Jost et al. (2003) description of the two core components of political conservatism. Second, they propose that the motives in the model are equally well served by rigid adherence to any extreme ideology regardless of whether it is right wing or left wing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-382
Number of pages7
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume129
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2003

Fingerprint

Politics
Psychology
Social Sciences
Uncertainty
Fear
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Psychological Motives and Political Orientation - The Left, the Right, and the Rigid : Comment on Jost et al. (2003). / Greenberg, Jeff L; Jonas, Eva.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 129, No. 3, 05.2003, p. 376-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b420eab57244f818172e3e2ae634ffb,
title = "Psychological Motives and Political Orientation - The Left, the Right, and the Rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003)",
abstract = "Presenting an impressive model based on a large body of evidence, J. T. Jost, J. Glaser, A.W. Kruglanski, and F. J. Sulloway (2003) proposed that political conservatism uniquely serves epistemic, existential, and ideological needs driven by fears and uncertainties. The authors offer an alternative view based on conceptual considerations, historical events, features of communist ideology and practice, and additional social science research not reviewed by Jost et al. (2003). First, the authors take issue with Jost et al. (2003) description of the two core components of political conservatism. Second, they propose that the motives in the model are equally well served by rigid adherence to any extreme ideology regardless of whether it is right wing or left wing.",
author = "Greenberg, {Jeff L} and Eva Jonas",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.376",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "376--382",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological Motives and Political Orientation - The Left, the Right, and the Rigid

T2 - Comment on Jost et al. (2003)

AU - Greenberg, Jeff L

AU - Jonas, Eva

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - Presenting an impressive model based on a large body of evidence, J. T. Jost, J. Glaser, A.W. Kruglanski, and F. J. Sulloway (2003) proposed that political conservatism uniquely serves epistemic, existential, and ideological needs driven by fears and uncertainties. The authors offer an alternative view based on conceptual considerations, historical events, features of communist ideology and practice, and additional social science research not reviewed by Jost et al. (2003). First, the authors take issue with Jost et al. (2003) description of the two core components of political conservatism. Second, they propose that the motives in the model are equally well served by rigid adherence to any extreme ideology regardless of whether it is right wing or left wing.

AB - Presenting an impressive model based on a large body of evidence, J. T. Jost, J. Glaser, A.W. Kruglanski, and F. J. Sulloway (2003) proposed that political conservatism uniquely serves epistemic, existential, and ideological needs driven by fears and uncertainties. The authors offer an alternative view based on conceptual considerations, historical events, features of communist ideology and practice, and additional social science research not reviewed by Jost et al. (2003). First, the authors take issue with Jost et al. (2003) description of the two core components of political conservatism. Second, they propose that the motives in the model are equally well served by rigid adherence to any extreme ideology regardless of whether it is right wing or left wing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038507594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038507594&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.376

DO - 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.376

M3 - Article

VL - 129

SP - 376

EP - 382

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 3

ER -