Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A test and extension of the intertwined model

Stephen A Rains, Monique Mitchell Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This manuscript reports 2 experiments that were conducted to test and extend the work of J. P. Dillard and L. Shen (2005) examining the cognitive and affective processes involved in psychological reactance. In particular, the studies reported here (a) examined the best-fitting model of reactance processes and (b) tested 3 factors that may affect reactance including argument quality, severity of the consequences associated with the message topic, and magnitude of the request made in the message. The results showed that the intertwined cognitive-affective model was the best-fitting model of reactance processes. Magnitude of the request was the only variable that affected reactance. The implications of these findings for research on reactance and persuasive health campaigns are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-269
Number of pages29
JournalHuman Communication Research
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

reactance
Persuasive Communication
Health Communication
Health Promotion
Health
Psychology
communication
Communication
health
Research
campaign
Experiments
experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication : A test and extension of the intertwined model. / Rains, Stephen A; Turner, Monique Mitchell.

In: Human Communication Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, 04.2007, p. 241-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{04acf03f9f7f47cbba780560972e7076,
title = "Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A test and extension of the intertwined model",
abstract = "This manuscript reports 2 experiments that were conducted to test and extend the work of J. P. Dillard and L. Shen (2005) examining the cognitive and affective processes involved in psychological reactance. In particular, the studies reported here (a) examined the best-fitting model of reactance processes and (b) tested 3 factors that may affect reactance including argument quality, severity of the consequences associated with the message topic, and magnitude of the request made in the message. The results showed that the intertwined cognitive-affective model was the best-fitting model of reactance processes. Magnitude of the request was the only variable that affected reactance. The implications of these findings for research on reactance and persuasive health campaigns are discussed.",
author = "Rains, {Stephen A} and Turner, {Monique Mitchell}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00298.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "241--269",
journal = "Human Communication Research",
issn = "0360-3989",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication

T2 - A test and extension of the intertwined model

AU - Rains, Stephen A

AU - Turner, Monique Mitchell

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - This manuscript reports 2 experiments that were conducted to test and extend the work of J. P. Dillard and L. Shen (2005) examining the cognitive and affective processes involved in psychological reactance. In particular, the studies reported here (a) examined the best-fitting model of reactance processes and (b) tested 3 factors that may affect reactance including argument quality, severity of the consequences associated with the message topic, and magnitude of the request made in the message. The results showed that the intertwined cognitive-affective model was the best-fitting model of reactance processes. Magnitude of the request was the only variable that affected reactance. The implications of these findings for research on reactance and persuasive health campaigns are discussed.

AB - This manuscript reports 2 experiments that were conducted to test and extend the work of J. P. Dillard and L. Shen (2005) examining the cognitive and affective processes involved in psychological reactance. In particular, the studies reported here (a) examined the best-fitting model of reactance processes and (b) tested 3 factors that may affect reactance including argument quality, severity of the consequences associated with the message topic, and magnitude of the request made in the message. The results showed that the intertwined cognitive-affective model was the best-fitting model of reactance processes. Magnitude of the request was the only variable that affected reactance. The implications of these findings for research on reactance and persuasive health campaigns are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947242372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947242372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00298.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00298.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33947242372

VL - 33

SP - 241

EP - 269

JO - Human Communication Research

JF - Human Communication Research

SN - 0360-3989

IS - 2

ER -