Psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS) Teacher Rating Scale and multiple gating procedure within elementary and middle school samples

Stephen P. Kilgus, Katie R Eklund, Nathaniel P. von der Embse, Crystal N. Taylor, Wesley A. Sims

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary purposes of this investigation were to (a) continue a line of research examining the psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener — Teacher Rating Scale (SAEBRS-TRS), and (b) develop and preliminarily evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel multiple gating procedure based on teacher nomination and the SAEBRS-TRS. Two studies were conducted with elementary and middle school student samples across two separate geographic locations. Study 1 (n = 864 students) results supported SAEBRS-TRS defensibility, revealing acceptable to optimal levels of internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Findings were promising for a combined multiple gating procedure, which demonstrated acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity. Study 2 (n = 1534 students), which replicated Study 1 procedures, further supported the SAEBRS-TRS' psychometric defensibility in terms of reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Despite the incorporation of revisions intended to promote sensitivity levels, the combined multiple gating procedure's diagnostic accuracy was similar to that found in Study 1. Taken together, results build upon prior research in support of the applied use of the SAEBRS-TRS, as well as justify future research regarding a SAEBRS-based multiple gating procedure. Implications for practice and study limitations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-39
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of School Psychology
Volume58
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

teacher rating
rating scale
Risk-Taking
Psychometrics
risk behavior
psychometrics
elementary school
diagnostic
Students
Reproducibility of Results
Geographic Locations
student
Research
Sensitivity and Specificity
teacher

Keywords

  • Behavioral and emotional risk
  • Rating scales
  • Teacher nomination
  • Universal screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS) Teacher Rating Scale and multiple gating procedure within elementary and middle school samples. / Kilgus, Stephen P.; Eklund, Katie R; von der Embse, Nathaniel P.; Taylor, Crystal N.; Sims, Wesley A.

In: Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 58, 01.10.2016, p. 21-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ecc28f6656d8464d8223f9453ae29af3,
title = "Psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS) Teacher Rating Scale and multiple gating procedure within elementary and middle school samples",
abstract = "The primary purposes of this investigation were to (a) continue a line of research examining the psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener — Teacher Rating Scale (SAEBRS-TRS), and (b) develop and preliminarily evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel multiple gating procedure based on teacher nomination and the SAEBRS-TRS. Two studies were conducted with elementary and middle school student samples across two separate geographic locations. Study 1 (n = 864 students) results supported SAEBRS-TRS defensibility, revealing acceptable to optimal levels of internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Findings were promising for a combined multiple gating procedure, which demonstrated acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity. Study 2 (n = 1534 students), which replicated Study 1 procedures, further supported the SAEBRS-TRS' psychometric defensibility in terms of reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Despite the incorporation of revisions intended to promote sensitivity levels, the combined multiple gating procedure's diagnostic accuracy was similar to that found in Study 1. Taken together, results build upon prior research in support of the applied use of the SAEBRS-TRS, as well as justify future research regarding a SAEBRS-based multiple gating procedure. Implications for practice and study limitations are discussed.",
keywords = "Behavioral and emotional risk, Rating scales, Teacher nomination, Universal screening",
author = "Kilgus, {Stephen P.} and Eklund, {Katie R} and {von der Embse}, {Nathaniel P.} and Taylor, {Crystal N.} and Sims, {Wesley A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsp.2016.07.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "21--39",
journal = "Journal of School Psychology",
issn = "0022-4405",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS) Teacher Rating Scale and multiple gating procedure within elementary and middle school samples

AU - Kilgus, Stephen P.

AU - Eklund, Katie R

AU - von der Embse, Nathaniel P.

AU - Taylor, Crystal N.

AU - Sims, Wesley A.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - The primary purposes of this investigation were to (a) continue a line of research examining the psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener — Teacher Rating Scale (SAEBRS-TRS), and (b) develop and preliminarily evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel multiple gating procedure based on teacher nomination and the SAEBRS-TRS. Two studies were conducted with elementary and middle school student samples across two separate geographic locations. Study 1 (n = 864 students) results supported SAEBRS-TRS defensibility, revealing acceptable to optimal levels of internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Findings were promising for a combined multiple gating procedure, which demonstrated acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity. Study 2 (n = 1534 students), which replicated Study 1 procedures, further supported the SAEBRS-TRS' psychometric defensibility in terms of reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Despite the incorporation of revisions intended to promote sensitivity levels, the combined multiple gating procedure's diagnostic accuracy was similar to that found in Study 1. Taken together, results build upon prior research in support of the applied use of the SAEBRS-TRS, as well as justify future research regarding a SAEBRS-based multiple gating procedure. Implications for practice and study limitations are discussed.

AB - The primary purposes of this investigation were to (a) continue a line of research examining the psychometric defensibility of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener — Teacher Rating Scale (SAEBRS-TRS), and (b) develop and preliminarily evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel multiple gating procedure based on teacher nomination and the SAEBRS-TRS. Two studies were conducted with elementary and middle school student samples across two separate geographic locations. Study 1 (n = 864 students) results supported SAEBRS-TRS defensibility, revealing acceptable to optimal levels of internal consistency reliability, concurrent validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Findings were promising for a combined multiple gating procedure, which demonstrated acceptable levels of sensitivity and specificity. Study 2 (n = 1534 students), which replicated Study 1 procedures, further supported the SAEBRS-TRS' psychometric defensibility in terms of reliability, validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Despite the incorporation of revisions intended to promote sensitivity levels, the combined multiple gating procedure's diagnostic accuracy was similar to that found in Study 1. Taken together, results build upon prior research in support of the applied use of the SAEBRS-TRS, as well as justify future research regarding a SAEBRS-based multiple gating procedure. Implications for practice and study limitations are discussed.

KW - Behavioral and emotional risk

KW - Rating scales

KW - Teacher nomination

KW - Universal screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978533703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978533703&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.07.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 27586068

AN - SCOPUS:84978533703

VL - 58

SP - 21

EP - 39

JO - Journal of School Psychology

JF - Journal of School Psychology

SN - 0022-4405

ER -