Psychometric properties of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale

Koen Milisen, Marquis D. Foreman, Annik Hendrickx, Jan Godderis, Ivo L Abraham, Paul L O Broos, Sabina De Geest

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Determination of a patient's cognitive status by use of a valid and reliable screening instrument is of major importance as early recognition and accurate diagnosis of delirium is necessary for effective management. This study determined the reliability, validity and diagnostic value of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale. Methods: A sample of 54 elderly hip fracture patients with a mean age of 80.9 years (SD = 7.85) were included. To test the psychometric properties of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale, performance on the NEECHAM was compared to the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), by using aggregated data based on 5 data collection measurement points (repeated measures). The CAM and MMSE served as gold standards. Results: The alpha coefficient for the total NEECHAM score was high (0.88). Principal components analysis yielded a two-component solution accounting for 70.8% of the total variance. High correlations were found between the total NEECHAM scores and total MMSE (0.75) and total CAM severity scores (-0.73), respectively. Diagnostic values using the CAM algorithm as gold standard showed 76.9% sensitivity, 64.6% specificity, 13.5% positive and 97.5% negative predictive values, respectively. Conclusion: This validation of the Flemish version of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale adds to previous evidence suggesting that this scale holds promise as a valuable screening instrument for delirium in clinical practice. Further validation studies in diverse clinical populations; however, are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number16
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 25 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Confusion
Psychometrics
Delirium
Validation Studies
Hip Fractures
Principal Component Analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Milisen, K., Foreman, M. D., Hendrickx, A., Godderis, J., Abraham, I. L., Broos, P. L. O., & De Geest, S. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale. BMC Psychiatry, 5, [16]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-5-16

Psychometric properties of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale. / Milisen, Koen; Foreman, Marquis D.; Hendrickx, Annik; Godderis, Jan; Abraham, Ivo L; Broos, Paul L O; De Geest, Sabina.

In: BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 5, 16, 25.03.2005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Milisen, K, Foreman, MD, Hendrickx, A, Godderis, J, Abraham, IL, Broos, PLO & De Geest, S 2005, 'Psychometric properties of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale', BMC Psychiatry, vol. 5, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-5-16
Milisen, Koen ; Foreman, Marquis D. ; Hendrickx, Annik ; Godderis, Jan ; Abraham, Ivo L ; Broos, Paul L O ; De Geest, Sabina. / Psychometric properties of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale. In: BMC Psychiatry. 2005 ; Vol. 5.
@article{068be0ea62e642f7b5f7f4e675f436e6,
title = "Psychometric properties of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale",
abstract = "Background: Determination of a patient's cognitive status by use of a valid and reliable screening instrument is of major importance as early recognition and accurate diagnosis of delirium is necessary for effective management. This study determined the reliability, validity and diagnostic value of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale. Methods: A sample of 54 elderly hip fracture patients with a mean age of 80.9 years (SD = 7.85) were included. To test the psychometric properties of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale, performance on the NEECHAM was compared to the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), by using aggregated data based on 5 data collection measurement points (repeated measures). The CAM and MMSE served as gold standards. Results: The alpha coefficient for the total NEECHAM score was high (0.88). Principal components analysis yielded a two-component solution accounting for 70.8{\%} of the total variance. High correlations were found between the total NEECHAM scores and total MMSE (0.75) and total CAM severity scores (-0.73), respectively. Diagnostic values using the CAM algorithm as gold standard showed 76.9{\%} sensitivity, 64.6{\%} specificity, 13.5{\%} positive and 97.5{\%} negative predictive values, respectively. Conclusion: This validation of the Flemish version of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale adds to previous evidence suggesting that this scale holds promise as a valuable screening instrument for delirium in clinical practice. Further validation studies in diverse clinical populations; however, are needed.",
author = "Koen Milisen and Foreman, {Marquis D.} and Annik Hendrickx and Jan Godderis and Abraham, {Ivo L} and Broos, {Paul L O} and {De Geest}, Sabina",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1186/1471-244X-5-16",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "BMC Psychiatry",
issn = "1471-244X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric properties of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale

AU - Milisen, Koen

AU - Foreman, Marquis D.

AU - Hendrickx, Annik

AU - Godderis, Jan

AU - Abraham, Ivo L

AU - Broos, Paul L O

AU - De Geest, Sabina

PY - 2005/3/25

Y1 - 2005/3/25

N2 - Background: Determination of a patient's cognitive status by use of a valid and reliable screening instrument is of major importance as early recognition and accurate diagnosis of delirium is necessary for effective management. This study determined the reliability, validity and diagnostic value of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale. Methods: A sample of 54 elderly hip fracture patients with a mean age of 80.9 years (SD = 7.85) were included. To test the psychometric properties of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale, performance on the NEECHAM was compared to the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), by using aggregated data based on 5 data collection measurement points (repeated measures). The CAM and MMSE served as gold standards. Results: The alpha coefficient for the total NEECHAM score was high (0.88). Principal components analysis yielded a two-component solution accounting for 70.8% of the total variance. High correlations were found between the total NEECHAM scores and total MMSE (0.75) and total CAM severity scores (-0.73), respectively. Diagnostic values using the CAM algorithm as gold standard showed 76.9% sensitivity, 64.6% specificity, 13.5% positive and 97.5% negative predictive values, respectively. Conclusion: This validation of the Flemish version of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale adds to previous evidence suggesting that this scale holds promise as a valuable screening instrument for delirium in clinical practice. Further validation studies in diverse clinical populations; however, are needed.

AB - Background: Determination of a patient's cognitive status by use of a valid and reliable screening instrument is of major importance as early recognition and accurate diagnosis of delirium is necessary for effective management. This study determined the reliability, validity and diagnostic value of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale. Methods: A sample of 54 elderly hip fracture patients with a mean age of 80.9 years (SD = 7.85) were included. To test the psychometric properties of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale, performance on the NEECHAM was compared to the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), by using aggregated data based on 5 data collection measurement points (repeated measures). The CAM and MMSE served as gold standards. Results: The alpha coefficient for the total NEECHAM score was high (0.88). Principal components analysis yielded a two-component solution accounting for 70.8% of the total variance. High correlations were found between the total NEECHAM scores and total MMSE (0.75) and total CAM severity scores (-0.73), respectively. Diagnostic values using the CAM algorithm as gold standard showed 76.9% sensitivity, 64.6% specificity, 13.5% positive and 97.5% negative predictive values, respectively. Conclusion: This validation of the Flemish version of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale adds to previous evidence suggesting that this scale holds promise as a valuable screening instrument for delirium in clinical practice. Further validation studies in diverse clinical populations; however, are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26844467310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26844467310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-244X-5-16

DO - 10.1186/1471-244X-5-16

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - BMC Psychiatry

JF - BMC Psychiatry

SN - 1471-244X

M1 - 16

ER -