Quality measures for the diagnosis and non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome in occupational settings

Teryl Nuckols, Philip I Harber, Karl Sandin, Douglas Benner, Haoling Weng, Rebecca Shaw, Anne Griffin, Steven Asch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Providing higher quality medical care to workers with occupationally associated carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may reduce disability, facilitate return to work, and lower the associated costs. Although many workers' compensation systems have adopted treatment guidelines to reduce the overuse of unnecessary care, limited attention has been paid to ensuring that the care workers do receive is high quality. Further, guidelines are not designed to enable objective assessments of quality of care. This study sought to develop quality measures for the diagnostic evaluation and non-operative management of CTS, including managing occupational activities and functional limitations. Methods: Using a variation of the well-established RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, we developed draft quality measures using guidelines and literature reviews. Next, in a two-round modified-Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 11 U.S. experts in CTS rated the measures on validity and feasibility. Results: Of 40 draft measures, experts rated 31 (78%) valid and feasible. Nine measures pertained to diagnostic evaluation, such as assessing symptoms, signs, and risk factors. Eleven pertain to non-operative treatments, such as the use of splints, steroid injections, and medications. Eleven others address assessing the association between symptoms and work, managing occupational activities, and accommodating functional limitations. Conclusions: These measures will complement existing treatment guidelines by enabling providers, payers, policymakers, and researchers to assess quality of care for CTS in an objective, structured manner. Given the characteristics of previous measures developed with these methods, greater adherence to these measures will probably lead to improved patient outcomes at a population level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-119
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Quality of Health Care
Guidelines
Workers' Compensation
Return to Work
Splints
Signs and Symptoms
Therapeutics
Steroids
Research Personnel
Costs and Cost Analysis
Injections
Population

Keywords

  • Carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Health care quality assurance
  • Standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Quality measures for the diagnosis and non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome in occupational settings. / Nuckols, Teryl; Harber, Philip I; Sandin, Karl; Benner, Douglas; Weng, Haoling; Shaw, Rebecca; Griffin, Anne; Asch, Steven.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 1, 03.2011, p. 100-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nuckols, Teryl ; Harber, Philip I ; Sandin, Karl ; Benner, Douglas ; Weng, Haoling ; Shaw, Rebecca ; Griffin, Anne ; Asch, Steven. / Quality measures for the diagnosis and non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome in occupational settings. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 100-119.
@article{a658164fa9314ac69115d45ed15dbf43,
title = "Quality measures for the diagnosis and non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome in occupational settings",
abstract = "Introduction: Providing higher quality medical care to workers with occupationally associated carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may reduce disability, facilitate return to work, and lower the associated costs. Although many workers' compensation systems have adopted treatment guidelines to reduce the overuse of unnecessary care, limited attention has been paid to ensuring that the care workers do receive is high quality. Further, guidelines are not designed to enable objective assessments of quality of care. This study sought to develop quality measures for the diagnostic evaluation and non-operative management of CTS, including managing occupational activities and functional limitations. Methods: Using a variation of the well-established RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, we developed draft quality measures using guidelines and literature reviews. Next, in a two-round modified-Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 11 U.S. experts in CTS rated the measures on validity and feasibility. Results: Of 40 draft measures, experts rated 31 (78{\%}) valid and feasible. Nine measures pertained to diagnostic evaluation, such as assessing symptoms, signs, and risk factors. Eleven pertain to non-operative treatments, such as the use of splints, steroid injections, and medications. Eleven others address assessing the association between symptoms and work, managing occupational activities, and accommodating functional limitations. Conclusions: These measures will complement existing treatment guidelines by enabling providers, payers, policymakers, and researchers to assess quality of care for CTS in an objective, structured manner. Given the characteristics of previous measures developed with these methods, greater adherence to these measures will probably lead to improved patient outcomes at a population level.",
keywords = "Carpal tunnel syndrome, Health care quality assurance, Standards",
author = "Teryl Nuckols and Harber, {Philip I} and Karl Sandin and Douglas Benner and Haoling Weng and Rebecca Shaw and Anne Griffin and Steven Asch",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-010-9260-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "100--119",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality measures for the diagnosis and non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome in occupational settings

AU - Nuckols, Teryl

AU - Harber, Philip I

AU - Sandin, Karl

AU - Benner, Douglas

AU - Weng, Haoling

AU - Shaw, Rebecca

AU - Griffin, Anne

AU - Asch, Steven

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Introduction: Providing higher quality medical care to workers with occupationally associated carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may reduce disability, facilitate return to work, and lower the associated costs. Although many workers' compensation systems have adopted treatment guidelines to reduce the overuse of unnecessary care, limited attention has been paid to ensuring that the care workers do receive is high quality. Further, guidelines are not designed to enable objective assessments of quality of care. This study sought to develop quality measures for the diagnostic evaluation and non-operative management of CTS, including managing occupational activities and functional limitations. Methods: Using a variation of the well-established RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, we developed draft quality measures using guidelines and literature reviews. Next, in a two-round modified-Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 11 U.S. experts in CTS rated the measures on validity and feasibility. Results: Of 40 draft measures, experts rated 31 (78%) valid and feasible. Nine measures pertained to diagnostic evaluation, such as assessing symptoms, signs, and risk factors. Eleven pertain to non-operative treatments, such as the use of splints, steroid injections, and medications. Eleven others address assessing the association between symptoms and work, managing occupational activities, and accommodating functional limitations. Conclusions: These measures will complement existing treatment guidelines by enabling providers, payers, policymakers, and researchers to assess quality of care for CTS in an objective, structured manner. Given the characteristics of previous measures developed with these methods, greater adherence to these measures will probably lead to improved patient outcomes at a population level.

AB - Introduction: Providing higher quality medical care to workers with occupationally associated carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may reduce disability, facilitate return to work, and lower the associated costs. Although many workers' compensation systems have adopted treatment guidelines to reduce the overuse of unnecessary care, limited attention has been paid to ensuring that the care workers do receive is high quality. Further, guidelines are not designed to enable objective assessments of quality of care. This study sought to develop quality measures for the diagnostic evaluation and non-operative management of CTS, including managing occupational activities and functional limitations. Methods: Using a variation of the well-established RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, we developed draft quality measures using guidelines and literature reviews. Next, in a two-round modified-Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 11 U.S. experts in CTS rated the measures on validity and feasibility. Results: Of 40 draft measures, experts rated 31 (78%) valid and feasible. Nine measures pertained to diagnostic evaluation, such as assessing symptoms, signs, and risk factors. Eleven pertain to non-operative treatments, such as the use of splints, steroid injections, and medications. Eleven others address assessing the association between symptoms and work, managing occupational activities, and accommodating functional limitations. Conclusions: These measures will complement existing treatment guidelines by enabling providers, payers, policymakers, and researchers to assess quality of care for CTS in an objective, structured manner. Given the characteristics of previous measures developed with these methods, greater adherence to these measures will probably lead to improved patient outcomes at a population level.

KW - Carpal tunnel syndrome

KW - Health care quality assurance

KW - Standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952194904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952194904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-010-9260-6

DO - 10.1007/s10926-010-9260-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 20737200

AN - SCOPUS:79952194904

VL - 21

SP - 100

EP - 119

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 1

ER -