Quality of Will, Private Blame and Conversation

Reply to Driver, Shoemaker, and Vargas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this paper, I defend my book Conversation and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2012) in response to three critics: Julia Driver, David Shoemaker, and Manuel Vargas. Driver raises questions about my account of private blame. Shoemaker finds problems with my account of quality of will. And Vargas questions the conversational nature of my account.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalCriminal Law and Philosophy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 5 2016

Fingerprint

conversation
driver
critic
responsibility
Responsibility

Keywords

  • Blame
  • Capacities for being responsible
  • Capacities for holding responsible
  • Conversational theory
  • Moral responsibility
  • Private blame
  • Quality of will

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{7c682c27490d41f38422c3f8cc46cc7e,
title = "Quality of Will, Private Blame and Conversation: Reply to Driver, Shoemaker, and Vargas",
abstract = "In this paper, I defend my book Conversation and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2012) in response to three critics: Julia Driver, David Shoemaker, and Manuel Vargas. Driver raises questions about my account of private blame. Shoemaker finds problems with my account of quality of will. And Vargas questions the conversational nature of my account.",
keywords = "Blame, Capacities for being responsible, Capacities for holding responsible, Conversational theory, Moral responsibility, Private blame, Quality of will",
author = "McKenna, {Michael S}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s11572-015-9389-7",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Criminal Law and Philosophy",
issn = "1871-9791",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of Will, Private Blame and Conversation

T2 - Reply to Driver, Shoemaker, and Vargas

AU - McKenna, Michael S

PY - 2016/1/5

Y1 - 2016/1/5

N2 - In this paper, I defend my book Conversation and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2012) in response to three critics: Julia Driver, David Shoemaker, and Manuel Vargas. Driver raises questions about my account of private blame. Shoemaker finds problems with my account of quality of will. And Vargas questions the conversational nature of my account.

AB - In this paper, I defend my book Conversation and Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2012) in response to three critics: Julia Driver, David Shoemaker, and Manuel Vargas. Driver raises questions about my account of private blame. Shoemaker finds problems with my account of quality of will. And Vargas questions the conversational nature of my account.

KW - Blame

KW - Capacities for being responsible

KW - Capacities for holding responsible

KW - Conversational theory

KW - Moral responsibility

KW - Private blame

KW - Quality of will

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953341642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953341642&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11572-015-9389-7

DO - 10.1007/s11572-015-9389-7

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Criminal Law and Philosophy

JF - Criminal Law and Philosophy

SN - 1871-9791

ER -