Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Temporal fluctuations in recruitment are involved in two distinct coexistence mechanisms, the storage effect and relative nonlinearity of competition, which may act simultaneously to stabilize species coexistence. It is shown that comparisons of recruitment variation between species at high versus low densities can test whether these mechanisms are responsible for stable coexistence. Moreover, under certain circumstances, these comparisons can measure the total coexistence stabilizing effect of the mechanism. These comparisons are clearest for the situation of an invader (a species perturbed to low density) in the presence of its competitors, termed residents. Then average invader-resident differences in the variances of log recruitment, potentially weighted by adult survival rates and species' sensitivities to competition, are proportional to the overall stabilizing effect of the storage effect and relative nonlinearity of competition. Less effective comparisons are available for species naturally at high and low densities or with substantial mean differences in average fitness. These developments lead also to a technique of partitioning the long-term low-density growth rate of a species into community average measures of stabilizing mechanisms, deviations from these measures, and other factors. The community average measure is argued as most appropriate for understanding the ability of a coexistence mechanism to stabilize coexistence. Individual species' deviations from the community average indicate the ways in a which a coexistence mechanism may affect average fitness differences between species either enhancing or diminishing the ability of a given set of species to coexist, depending on other factors. This approach provides a general new tool for analyzing species coexistence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-357
Number of pages13
JournalTheoretical Population Biology
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

coexistence
Growth
testing
survival rate
nonlinearity
fitness
partitioning
methodology
comparison
effect

Keywords

  • Coexistence
  • Recruitment variation
  • Relative nonlinearity
  • Storage effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations. / Chesson, Peter.

In: Theoretical Population Biology, Vol. 64, No. 3, 11.2003, p. 345-357.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9422f5b651e14972be34672e22854072,
title = "Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations",
abstract = "Temporal fluctuations in recruitment are involved in two distinct coexistence mechanisms, the storage effect and relative nonlinearity of competition, which may act simultaneously to stabilize species coexistence. It is shown that comparisons of recruitment variation between species at high versus low densities can test whether these mechanisms are responsible for stable coexistence. Moreover, under certain circumstances, these comparisons can measure the total coexistence stabilizing effect of the mechanism. These comparisons are clearest for the situation of an invader (a species perturbed to low density) in the presence of its competitors, termed residents. Then average invader-resident differences in the variances of log recruitment, potentially weighted by adult survival rates and species' sensitivities to competition, are proportional to the overall stabilizing effect of the storage effect and relative nonlinearity of competition. Less effective comparisons are available for species naturally at high and low densities or with substantial mean differences in average fitness. These developments lead also to a technique of partitioning the long-term low-density growth rate of a species into community average measures of stabilizing mechanisms, deviations from these measures, and other factors. The community average measure is argued as most appropriate for understanding the ability of a coexistence mechanism to stabilize coexistence. Individual species' deviations from the community average indicate the ways in a which a coexistence mechanism may affect average fitness differences between species either enhancing or diminishing the ability of a given set of species to coexist, depending on other factors. This approach provides a general new tool for analyzing species coexistence.",
keywords = "Coexistence, Recruitment variation, Relative nonlinearity, Storage effect",
author = "Peter Chesson",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00095-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "345--357",
journal = "Theoretical Population Biology",
issn = "0040-5809",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying and testing coexistence mechanisms arising from recruitment fluctuations

AU - Chesson, Peter

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - Temporal fluctuations in recruitment are involved in two distinct coexistence mechanisms, the storage effect and relative nonlinearity of competition, which may act simultaneously to stabilize species coexistence. It is shown that comparisons of recruitment variation between species at high versus low densities can test whether these mechanisms are responsible for stable coexistence. Moreover, under certain circumstances, these comparisons can measure the total coexistence stabilizing effect of the mechanism. These comparisons are clearest for the situation of an invader (a species perturbed to low density) in the presence of its competitors, termed residents. Then average invader-resident differences in the variances of log recruitment, potentially weighted by adult survival rates and species' sensitivities to competition, are proportional to the overall stabilizing effect of the storage effect and relative nonlinearity of competition. Less effective comparisons are available for species naturally at high and low densities or with substantial mean differences in average fitness. These developments lead also to a technique of partitioning the long-term low-density growth rate of a species into community average measures of stabilizing mechanisms, deviations from these measures, and other factors. The community average measure is argued as most appropriate for understanding the ability of a coexistence mechanism to stabilize coexistence. Individual species' deviations from the community average indicate the ways in a which a coexistence mechanism may affect average fitness differences between species either enhancing or diminishing the ability of a given set of species to coexist, depending on other factors. This approach provides a general new tool for analyzing species coexistence.

AB - Temporal fluctuations in recruitment are involved in two distinct coexistence mechanisms, the storage effect and relative nonlinearity of competition, which may act simultaneously to stabilize species coexistence. It is shown that comparisons of recruitment variation between species at high versus low densities can test whether these mechanisms are responsible for stable coexistence. Moreover, under certain circumstances, these comparisons can measure the total coexistence stabilizing effect of the mechanism. These comparisons are clearest for the situation of an invader (a species perturbed to low density) in the presence of its competitors, termed residents. Then average invader-resident differences in the variances of log recruitment, potentially weighted by adult survival rates and species' sensitivities to competition, are proportional to the overall stabilizing effect of the storage effect and relative nonlinearity of competition. Less effective comparisons are available for species naturally at high and low densities or with substantial mean differences in average fitness. These developments lead also to a technique of partitioning the long-term low-density growth rate of a species into community average measures of stabilizing mechanisms, deviations from these measures, and other factors. The community average measure is argued as most appropriate for understanding the ability of a coexistence mechanism to stabilize coexistence. Individual species' deviations from the community average indicate the ways in a which a coexistence mechanism may affect average fitness differences between species either enhancing or diminishing the ability of a given set of species to coexist, depending on other factors. This approach provides a general new tool for analyzing species coexistence.

KW - Coexistence

KW - Recruitment variation

KW - Relative nonlinearity

KW - Storage effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0348228997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0348228997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00095-9

DO - 10.1016/S0040-5809(03)00095-9

M3 - Article

C2 - 14522174

AN - SCOPUS:0348228997

VL - 64

SP - 345

EP - 357

JO - Theoretical Population Biology

JF - Theoretical Population Biology

SN - 0040-5809

IS - 3

ER -