Quantitative analysis of hypoperfusion in acute stroke

Arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast

Kambiz Nael, Arash Meshksar, David S. Liebeskind, Bruce M Coull, Elizabeth A Krupinski, J. Pablo Villablanca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: This study compares the concordance between arterial spin labeling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) for the identification of regional hypoperfusion and diffusion-perfusion mismatch tissue classification using a quantitative method. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were as follows: patients with acute ischemic syndrome with symptom onset <24 hours and acquisition of both ASL and DSC MR perfusion. The volumes of infarction and hypoperfused lesions were calculated on ASL and DSC multi-parametric maps. Patients were classified into reperfused, matched, or mismatch groups using time to maximum >6 sec as the reference. In a subset of patients who were successfully recanalized, the identical analysis was performed and the infarction and hypoperfused lesion volumes were used for paired pre- and posttreatment comparisons. Results: Forty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Twenty patients underwent successful endovascular revascularization (TICI>2a), resulting in a total of 61 ASL-DSC data pairs for comparison. The hypoperfusion volume on ASL-cerebral blood flow best approximated the DSC-time to peak volume (r=0.83) in pretreatment group and time to maximum (r=0.46) after recanalization. Both ASL-cerebral blood flow and DSC-TTP overestimated the hypoperfusion volume compared with time to maximum volume in pretreatment (F=27.41, P<0.0001) and recanalized patients (F=8.78, P<0.0001). Conclusions: ASL-cerebral blood flow overestimates the DSC time to maximum hypoperfusion volume and mismatch classification in patients with acute ischemic syndrome. Continued overestimation of hypoperfused volume after recanalization suggests flow pattern and velocity changes in addition to arterial transit delay can affects the performance of ASL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3090-3096
Number of pages7
JournalStroke
Volume44
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Cerebrovascular Circulation
Stroke
Infarction
Retrospective Studies
Perfusion

Keywords

  • ASL
  • Cerebral revascularization
  • Perfusion-weighted MRI
  • Reperfusion
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Quantitative analysis of hypoperfusion in acute stroke : Arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast. / Nael, Kambiz; Meshksar, Arash; Liebeskind, David S.; Coull, Bruce M; Krupinski, Elizabeth A; Pablo Villablanca, J.

In: Stroke, Vol. 44, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 3090-3096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{217cd16407284b4f9908ee7ff37f7da0,
title = "Quantitative analysis of hypoperfusion in acute stroke: Arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: This study compares the concordance between arterial spin labeling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) for the identification of regional hypoperfusion and diffusion-perfusion mismatch tissue classification using a quantitative method. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were as follows: patients with acute ischemic syndrome with symptom onset <24 hours and acquisition of both ASL and DSC MR perfusion. The volumes of infarction and hypoperfused lesions were calculated on ASL and DSC multi-parametric maps. Patients were classified into reperfused, matched, or mismatch groups using time to maximum >6 sec as the reference. In a subset of patients who were successfully recanalized, the identical analysis was performed and the infarction and hypoperfused lesion volumes were used for paired pre- and posttreatment comparisons. Results: Forty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Twenty patients underwent successful endovascular revascularization (TICI>2a), resulting in a total of 61 ASL-DSC data pairs for comparison. The hypoperfusion volume on ASL-cerebral blood flow best approximated the DSC-time to peak volume (r=0.83) in pretreatment group and time to maximum (r=0.46) after recanalization. Both ASL-cerebral blood flow and DSC-TTP overestimated the hypoperfusion volume compared with time to maximum volume in pretreatment (F=27.41, P<0.0001) and recanalized patients (F=8.78, P<0.0001). Conclusions: ASL-cerebral blood flow overestimates the DSC time to maximum hypoperfusion volume and mismatch classification in patients with acute ischemic syndrome. Continued overestimation of hypoperfused volume after recanalization suggests flow pattern and velocity changes in addition to arterial transit delay can affects the performance of ASL.",
keywords = "ASL, Cerebral revascularization, Perfusion-weighted MRI, Reperfusion, Stroke",
author = "Kambiz Nael and Arash Meshksar and Liebeskind, {David S.} and Coull, {Bruce M} and Krupinski, {Elizabeth A} and {Pablo Villablanca}, J.",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002377",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "3090--3096",
journal = "Stroke",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative analysis of hypoperfusion in acute stroke

T2 - Arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast

AU - Nael, Kambiz

AU - Meshksar, Arash

AU - Liebeskind, David S.

AU - Coull, Bruce M

AU - Krupinski, Elizabeth A

AU - Pablo Villablanca, J.

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Background and Purpose: This study compares the concordance between arterial spin labeling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) for the identification of regional hypoperfusion and diffusion-perfusion mismatch tissue classification using a quantitative method. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were as follows: patients with acute ischemic syndrome with symptom onset <24 hours and acquisition of both ASL and DSC MR perfusion. The volumes of infarction and hypoperfused lesions were calculated on ASL and DSC multi-parametric maps. Patients were classified into reperfused, matched, or mismatch groups using time to maximum >6 sec as the reference. In a subset of patients who were successfully recanalized, the identical analysis was performed and the infarction and hypoperfused lesion volumes were used for paired pre- and posttreatment comparisons. Results: Forty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Twenty patients underwent successful endovascular revascularization (TICI>2a), resulting in a total of 61 ASL-DSC data pairs for comparison. The hypoperfusion volume on ASL-cerebral blood flow best approximated the DSC-time to peak volume (r=0.83) in pretreatment group and time to maximum (r=0.46) after recanalization. Both ASL-cerebral blood flow and DSC-TTP overestimated the hypoperfusion volume compared with time to maximum volume in pretreatment (F=27.41, P<0.0001) and recanalized patients (F=8.78, P<0.0001). Conclusions: ASL-cerebral blood flow overestimates the DSC time to maximum hypoperfusion volume and mismatch classification in patients with acute ischemic syndrome. Continued overestimation of hypoperfused volume after recanalization suggests flow pattern and velocity changes in addition to arterial transit delay can affects the performance of ASL.

AB - Background and Purpose: This study compares the concordance between arterial spin labeling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) for the identification of regional hypoperfusion and diffusion-perfusion mismatch tissue classification using a quantitative method. Methods: The inclusion criteria for this retrospective study were as follows: patients with acute ischemic syndrome with symptom onset <24 hours and acquisition of both ASL and DSC MR perfusion. The volumes of infarction and hypoperfused lesions were calculated on ASL and DSC multi-parametric maps. Patients were classified into reperfused, matched, or mismatch groups using time to maximum >6 sec as the reference. In a subset of patients who were successfully recanalized, the identical analysis was performed and the infarction and hypoperfused lesion volumes were used for paired pre- and posttreatment comparisons. Results: Forty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Twenty patients underwent successful endovascular revascularization (TICI>2a), resulting in a total of 61 ASL-DSC data pairs for comparison. The hypoperfusion volume on ASL-cerebral blood flow best approximated the DSC-time to peak volume (r=0.83) in pretreatment group and time to maximum (r=0.46) after recanalization. Both ASL-cerebral blood flow and DSC-TTP overestimated the hypoperfusion volume compared with time to maximum volume in pretreatment (F=27.41, P<0.0001) and recanalized patients (F=8.78, P<0.0001). Conclusions: ASL-cerebral blood flow overestimates the DSC time to maximum hypoperfusion volume and mismatch classification in patients with acute ischemic syndrome. Continued overestimation of hypoperfused volume after recanalization suggests flow pattern and velocity changes in addition to arterial transit delay can affects the performance of ASL.

KW - ASL

KW - Cerebral revascularization

KW - Perfusion-weighted MRI

KW - Reperfusion

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888291296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888291296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002377

DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002377

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 3090

EP - 3096

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 11

ER -