Questions of Complexity and Scale in Explanations for Cultural Transitions in the Pleistocene: A Case Study from the Early Upper Paleolithic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Matching scales of observation and explanation is an essential challenge for archaeology, Paleolithic archaeology in particular. This paper presents a case study from the Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP) in the Eastern Mediterranean to illustrate some of the scalar issues in explaining transitions in the Pleistocene. The cultural sequence at Üçaǧi{dotless}zli{dotless} Cave I documents both continuity and change in a range of behaviors over approximately 12 ky. The sequence spans the transition from one EUP cultural unit, the Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) to another one, the Ahmarian. There is evidence for changes in lithic technology and retouched tool forms, human diets, and the role of the site within a regional land use system, but few if any of these changes are closely timed with the shift from one archaeological "culture" to another. In this particular case, local and regional transitions seem to be largely unconnected. However, considering the local situations allows a more precise focus on what the broader cultural transition represents and how it might be studied.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-211
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Archaeological Method and Theory
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

archaeology
continuity
land use
evidence
Early Upper Palaeolithic
Pleistocene
Archaeology

Keywords

  • Complex systems
  • Emergent properties
  • Scale
  • Transitions
  • Upper Paleolithic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

@article{b9938babea7442ca998f73c610f495f0,
title = "Questions of Complexity and Scale in Explanations for Cultural Transitions in the Pleistocene: A Case Study from the Early Upper Paleolithic",
abstract = "Matching scales of observation and explanation is an essential challenge for archaeology, Paleolithic archaeology in particular. This paper presents a case study from the Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP) in the Eastern Mediterranean to illustrate some of the scalar issues in explaining transitions in the Pleistocene. The cultural sequence at {\"U}{\cc}aǧi{dotless}zli{dotless} Cave I documents both continuity and change in a range of behaviors over approximately 12 ky. The sequence spans the transition from one EUP cultural unit, the Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) to another one, the Ahmarian. There is evidence for changes in lithic technology and retouched tool forms, human diets, and the role of the site within a regional land use system, but few if any of these changes are closely timed with the shift from one archaeological {"}culture{"} to another. In this particular case, local and regional transitions seem to be largely unconnected. However, considering the local situations allows a more precise focus on what the broader cultural transition represents and how it might be studied.",
keywords = "Complex systems, Emergent properties, Scale, Transitions, Upper Paleolithic",
author = "Kuhn, {Steven L}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s10816-012-9146-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "194--211",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory",
issn = "1072-5369",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Questions of Complexity and Scale in Explanations for Cultural Transitions in the Pleistocene

T2 - A Case Study from the Early Upper Paleolithic

AU - Kuhn, Steven L

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Matching scales of observation and explanation is an essential challenge for archaeology, Paleolithic archaeology in particular. This paper presents a case study from the Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP) in the Eastern Mediterranean to illustrate some of the scalar issues in explaining transitions in the Pleistocene. The cultural sequence at Üçaǧi{dotless}zli{dotless} Cave I documents both continuity and change in a range of behaviors over approximately 12 ky. The sequence spans the transition from one EUP cultural unit, the Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) to another one, the Ahmarian. There is evidence for changes in lithic technology and retouched tool forms, human diets, and the role of the site within a regional land use system, but few if any of these changes are closely timed with the shift from one archaeological "culture" to another. In this particular case, local and regional transitions seem to be largely unconnected. However, considering the local situations allows a more precise focus on what the broader cultural transition represents and how it might be studied.

AB - Matching scales of observation and explanation is an essential challenge for archaeology, Paleolithic archaeology in particular. This paper presents a case study from the Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP) in the Eastern Mediterranean to illustrate some of the scalar issues in explaining transitions in the Pleistocene. The cultural sequence at Üçaǧi{dotless}zli{dotless} Cave I documents both continuity and change in a range of behaviors over approximately 12 ky. The sequence spans the transition from one EUP cultural unit, the Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) to another one, the Ahmarian. There is evidence for changes in lithic technology and retouched tool forms, human diets, and the role of the site within a regional land use system, but few if any of these changes are closely timed with the shift from one archaeological "culture" to another. In this particular case, local and regional transitions seem to be largely unconnected. However, considering the local situations allows a more precise focus on what the broader cultural transition represents and how it might be studied.

KW - Complex systems

KW - Emergent properties

KW - Scale

KW - Transitions

KW - Upper Paleolithic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876891534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876891534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10816-012-9146-3

DO - 10.1007/s10816-012-9146-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84876891534

VL - 20

SP - 194

EP - 211

JO - Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

JF - Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

SN - 1072-5369

IS - 2

ER -