Race is a relationship, and not a thing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The methods of class analysis remain vital for understanding and explaining racial processes. Social historians' exposure and exploration of the contingency, relationality, and contextuality of all historical processes remains unsurpassed and indispensable in understanding race, gender, sexuality, and imperialism, among the multiple historical formations "the cultural turn" rendered newly visible. Struggles to integrate analyses of race, gender, and other social dynamics into historical and theoretical accounts of class formation have deepened our understanding that all social formations have been fissured on multiple axes of power and the resources power commands. Racialized people were neither the sole nor necessarily the most visible "others" in these multiply stratified societies. Denouncing metropolitan populations as uniformly racist and imperialistic, thus implicitly white, may concede, participate in and reproduce racialized and colonized people's exclusion from these societies. Applying class analyses to racial processes instead exposes their contingent, protean and relational nature. Understanding racial formation as an historical process rather than a static, naturalized "category," as "a relationship, and not a thing" can rescue racial difference, racism, and the history of racialized people from the margins and ghettos of historical scholarship, placing them instead at the intersection of the multiple social processes shaping our history.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-130+284
JournalJournal of Social History
Volume37
Issue number1
StatePublished - Sep 2003

Fingerprint

metropolitan population
cultural turn
ghetto
gender
imperialism
history
social process
society
contingency
racism
historian
sexuality
exclusion
resources
Historical Process
History
Visible
Cultural Turn
Contingent
Metropolitan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History

Cite this

Race is a relationship, and not a thing. / Tabili, Laura -.

In: Journal of Social History, Vol. 37, No. 1, 09.2003, p. 125-130+284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a72ecc37cbf54c3d9b98bd0980eba4ac,
title = "Race is a relationship, and not a thing",
abstract = "The methods of class analysis remain vital for understanding and explaining racial processes. Social historians' exposure and exploration of the contingency, relationality, and contextuality of all historical processes remains unsurpassed and indispensable in understanding race, gender, sexuality, and imperialism, among the multiple historical formations {"}the cultural turn{"} rendered newly visible. Struggles to integrate analyses of race, gender, and other social dynamics into historical and theoretical accounts of class formation have deepened our understanding that all social formations have been fissured on multiple axes of power and the resources power commands. Racialized people were neither the sole nor necessarily the most visible {"}others{"} in these multiply stratified societies. Denouncing metropolitan populations as uniformly racist and imperialistic, thus implicitly white, may concede, participate in and reproduce racialized and colonized people's exclusion from these societies. Applying class analyses to racial processes instead exposes their contingent, protean and relational nature. Understanding racial formation as an historical process rather than a static, naturalized {"}category,{"} as {"}a relationship, and not a thing{"} can rescue racial difference, racism, and the history of racialized people from the margins and ghettos of historical scholarship, placing them instead at the intersection of the multiple social processes shaping our history.",
author = "Tabili, {Laura -}",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "125--130+284",
journal = "Journal of Social History",
issn = "0022-4529",
publisher = "George Mason University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race is a relationship, and not a thing

AU - Tabili, Laura -

PY - 2003/9

Y1 - 2003/9

N2 - The methods of class analysis remain vital for understanding and explaining racial processes. Social historians' exposure and exploration of the contingency, relationality, and contextuality of all historical processes remains unsurpassed and indispensable in understanding race, gender, sexuality, and imperialism, among the multiple historical formations "the cultural turn" rendered newly visible. Struggles to integrate analyses of race, gender, and other social dynamics into historical and theoretical accounts of class formation have deepened our understanding that all social formations have been fissured on multiple axes of power and the resources power commands. Racialized people were neither the sole nor necessarily the most visible "others" in these multiply stratified societies. Denouncing metropolitan populations as uniformly racist and imperialistic, thus implicitly white, may concede, participate in and reproduce racialized and colonized people's exclusion from these societies. Applying class analyses to racial processes instead exposes their contingent, protean and relational nature. Understanding racial formation as an historical process rather than a static, naturalized "category," as "a relationship, and not a thing" can rescue racial difference, racism, and the history of racialized people from the margins and ghettos of historical scholarship, placing them instead at the intersection of the multiple social processes shaping our history.

AB - The methods of class analysis remain vital for understanding and explaining racial processes. Social historians' exposure and exploration of the contingency, relationality, and contextuality of all historical processes remains unsurpassed and indispensable in understanding race, gender, sexuality, and imperialism, among the multiple historical formations "the cultural turn" rendered newly visible. Struggles to integrate analyses of race, gender, and other social dynamics into historical and theoretical accounts of class formation have deepened our understanding that all social formations have been fissured on multiple axes of power and the resources power commands. Racialized people were neither the sole nor necessarily the most visible "others" in these multiply stratified societies. Denouncing metropolitan populations as uniformly racist and imperialistic, thus implicitly white, may concede, participate in and reproduce racialized and colonized people's exclusion from these societies. Applying class analyses to racial processes instead exposes their contingent, protean and relational nature. Understanding racial formation as an historical process rather than a static, naturalized "category," as "a relationship, and not a thing" can rescue racial difference, racism, and the history of racialized people from the margins and ghettos of historical scholarship, placing them instead at the intersection of the multiple social processes shaping our history.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141652975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141652975&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0141652975

VL - 37

SP - 125-130+284

JO - Journal of Social History

JF - Journal of Social History

SN - 0022-4529

IS - 1

ER -