Race Without Gender? Trends and Limitations in the Higher Education Scholarship Regarding Men of Color

Nolan L. Cabrera, Alex K. Karaman, Tracy Arámbula Ballysingh, Yadira G. Oregon, Eliaquin A. Gonell, Jameson D. Lopez, Regina Deil-Amen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The underrepresentation and underperformance of men of color relative to women of color within institutions of higher education have been extensively studied the past 20 years. The purpose of this study is to understand trends in how this research has been conducted rather than understand “best practices” to support this student population. To achieve this, we reviewed 153 pieces of scholarship from 1999 to 2019 using an intersectional and critical content analysis approach. Findings revealed that the bulk of scholarship involved onetime interviews for its empirical foundations, and the overwhelming majority centered the racial experiences of Black and Latinx men. In contrast, few analyses critically explored gender, sexual orientation, or social class. Additionally, scholarship that centered Asian American, Indigenous, multiracial, and trans* men of color was scant or nonexistent. Given these large gaps in the knowledge base, we offer guidance for the next generation of men of color in higher education scholarship in terms of analytical foci, theoretical frameworks, and methodologies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalReview of Educational Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2021

Keywords

  • content analysis
  • higher education research
  • intersectionality
  • men of color
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Race Without Gender? Trends and Limitations in the Higher Education Scholarship Regarding Men of Color'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this