Ranking cancer risks of organic hazardous air pollutants in the United States

Miranda M Loh, Jonathan I. Levy, John D. Spengler, E. Andres Houseman, Deborah H. Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In this study we compared cancer risks from organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) based on total personal exposure summed across different microenviromnents and exposure pathways. Methods: We developed distributions of personal exposure concentrations using field monitoring and modeling data for inhalation and, where relevant, ingestion pathways. We calculated risks for a nonoccupationally exposed and nonsmoking population using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) unit risks. We determined the contribution to risk from indoor versus outdoor sources using indoor/outdoor ratios for gaseous compounds and the infiltration factor for particle-bound compounds. Results: With OEHHA's unit risks, the highest ranking compounds based on the population median are 1,3-butadiene, formaldehyde, benzene, and dioxin, with risks on the order of 10-4-10-5. The highest risk compounds with the U.S. EPA unit risks were dioxin, benzene, formaldehyde, and chloroform, with risks on a similar order of magnitude. Although indoor exposures are responsible for nearly 70% of risk using OEHHA's unit risks, when infiltration is accounted for, inhalation of outdoor sources contributed 50% to total risk, on average. Additionally, 15% of risk resulted from exposures through food, mainly due to dioxin. Conclusions: Most of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, benzene, acetaldehyde, and 1,3-buta- diene risk came from outdoor sources, whereas indoor sources were primarily responsible for chloroform, formaldehyde, and naphthalene risks. The infiltration of outdoor pollution into buildings, emissions from indoor sources, and uptake through food are all important to consider in reducing overall personal risk to HAPS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1160-1168
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume115
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Air Pollutants
ranking
Neoplasms
Dioxins
Benzene
formaldehyde
dioxin
Formaldehyde
Infiltration
benzene
United States Environmental Protection Agency
infiltration
cancer risk
air pollutant
Chloroform
chloroform
Environmental Protection Agency
Inhalation
Food
Acetaldehyde

Keywords

  • Hazardous air pollutants
  • Personal exposure
  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
  • Risk assesment
  • Volatile organic compounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Ranking cancer risks of organic hazardous air pollutants in the United States. / Loh, Miranda M; Levy, Jonathan I.; Spengler, John D.; Houseman, E. Andres; Bennett, Deborah H.

In: Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 115, No. 8, 08.2007, p. 1160-1168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Loh, Miranda M ; Levy, Jonathan I. ; Spengler, John D. ; Houseman, E. Andres ; Bennett, Deborah H. / Ranking cancer risks of organic hazardous air pollutants in the United States. In: Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007 ; Vol. 115, No. 8. pp. 1160-1168.
@article{6edcca81ea6c4e62881e0ee8ac97c484,
title = "Ranking cancer risks of organic hazardous air pollutants in the United States",
abstract = "Background: In this study we compared cancer risks from organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) based on total personal exposure summed across different microenviromnents and exposure pathways. Methods: We developed distributions of personal exposure concentrations using field monitoring and modeling data for inhalation and, where relevant, ingestion pathways. We calculated risks for a nonoccupationally exposed and nonsmoking population using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) unit risks. We determined the contribution to risk from indoor versus outdoor sources using indoor/outdoor ratios for gaseous compounds and the infiltration factor for particle-bound compounds. Results: With OEHHA's unit risks, the highest ranking compounds based on the population median are 1,3-butadiene, formaldehyde, benzene, and dioxin, with risks on the order of 10-4-10-5. The highest risk compounds with the U.S. EPA unit risks were dioxin, benzene, formaldehyde, and chloroform, with risks on a similar order of magnitude. Although indoor exposures are responsible for nearly 70{\%} of risk using OEHHA's unit risks, when infiltration is accounted for, inhalation of outdoor sources contributed 50{\%} to total risk, on average. Additionally, 15{\%} of risk resulted from exposures through food, mainly due to dioxin. Conclusions: Most of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, benzene, acetaldehyde, and 1,3-buta- diene risk came from outdoor sources, whereas indoor sources were primarily responsible for chloroform, formaldehyde, and naphthalene risks. The infiltration of outdoor pollution into buildings, emissions from indoor sources, and uptake through food are all important to consider in reducing overall personal risk to HAPS.",
keywords = "Hazardous air pollutants, Personal exposure, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Risk assesment, Volatile organic compounds",
author = "Loh, {Miranda M} and Levy, {Jonathan I.} and Spengler, {John D.} and Houseman, {E. Andres} and Bennett, {Deborah H.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1289/ehp.9884",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "1160--1168",
journal = "Environmental Health Perspectives",
issn = "0091-6765",
publisher = "Public Health Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ranking cancer risks of organic hazardous air pollutants in the United States

AU - Loh, Miranda M

AU - Levy, Jonathan I.

AU - Spengler, John D.

AU - Houseman, E. Andres

AU - Bennett, Deborah H.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - Background: In this study we compared cancer risks from organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) based on total personal exposure summed across different microenviromnents and exposure pathways. Methods: We developed distributions of personal exposure concentrations using field monitoring and modeling data for inhalation and, where relevant, ingestion pathways. We calculated risks for a nonoccupationally exposed and nonsmoking population using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) unit risks. We determined the contribution to risk from indoor versus outdoor sources using indoor/outdoor ratios for gaseous compounds and the infiltration factor for particle-bound compounds. Results: With OEHHA's unit risks, the highest ranking compounds based on the population median are 1,3-butadiene, formaldehyde, benzene, and dioxin, with risks on the order of 10-4-10-5. The highest risk compounds with the U.S. EPA unit risks were dioxin, benzene, formaldehyde, and chloroform, with risks on a similar order of magnitude. Although indoor exposures are responsible for nearly 70% of risk using OEHHA's unit risks, when infiltration is accounted for, inhalation of outdoor sources contributed 50% to total risk, on average. Additionally, 15% of risk resulted from exposures through food, mainly due to dioxin. Conclusions: Most of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, benzene, acetaldehyde, and 1,3-buta- diene risk came from outdoor sources, whereas indoor sources were primarily responsible for chloroform, formaldehyde, and naphthalene risks. The infiltration of outdoor pollution into buildings, emissions from indoor sources, and uptake through food are all important to consider in reducing overall personal risk to HAPS.

AB - Background: In this study we compared cancer risks from organic hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) based on total personal exposure summed across different microenviromnents and exposure pathways. Methods: We developed distributions of personal exposure concentrations using field monitoring and modeling data for inhalation and, where relevant, ingestion pathways. We calculated risks for a nonoccupationally exposed and nonsmoking population using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) unit risks. We determined the contribution to risk from indoor versus outdoor sources using indoor/outdoor ratios for gaseous compounds and the infiltration factor for particle-bound compounds. Results: With OEHHA's unit risks, the highest ranking compounds based on the population median are 1,3-butadiene, formaldehyde, benzene, and dioxin, with risks on the order of 10-4-10-5. The highest risk compounds with the U.S. EPA unit risks were dioxin, benzene, formaldehyde, and chloroform, with risks on a similar order of magnitude. Although indoor exposures are responsible for nearly 70% of risk using OEHHA's unit risks, when infiltration is accounted for, inhalation of outdoor sources contributed 50% to total risk, on average. Additionally, 15% of risk resulted from exposures through food, mainly due to dioxin. Conclusions: Most of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, benzene, acetaldehyde, and 1,3-buta- diene risk came from outdoor sources, whereas indoor sources were primarily responsible for chloroform, formaldehyde, and naphthalene risks. The infiltration of outdoor pollution into buildings, emissions from indoor sources, and uptake through food are all important to consider in reducing overall personal risk to HAPS.

KW - Hazardous air pollutants

KW - Personal exposure

KW - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

KW - Risk assesment

KW - Volatile organic compounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848894569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848894569&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1289/ehp.9884

DO - 10.1289/ehp.9884

M3 - Article

C2 - 17687442

AN - SCOPUS:34848894569

VL - 115

SP - 1160

EP - 1168

JO - Environmental Health Perspectives

JF - Environmental Health Perspectives

SN - 0091-6765

IS - 8

ER -